Methods and systems for an artificial intelligence support network for vibrant constitutional guidance

ABSTRACT

A system for an artificial intelligence support network for informed advisor guidance includes a diagnostic engine operating on a computing device and configured to receive a biological extraction related to a user, said biological extraction comprising a self-assessment of the user, and generate a diagnostic output as a function of the self-assessment of the user The system includes an advisor module. The advisor module is configured to select an informed advisor as a function of the diagnostic output, generate an advisory output as a function of the diagnostic output, said advisory output identifying the current condition of the user, and transmit the advisory output to a client device associated with the selected informed advisor.

RELATED APPLICATION DATA

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/733,509, filed on Jan. 3, 2020 and titled “METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT NETWORK FOR VIBRANT CONSTITUTIONAL GUIDANCE”, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/372,562, filed on Apr. 2, 2019 and titled “METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT NETWORK FOR VIBRANT CONSTITUTIONAL GUIDANCE”; each of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/733,509 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/372,562 is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to the field of artificial intelligence. In particular, the present invention is directed to methods and systems for an artificial intelligence support network for vibrant constitutional guidance.

BACKGROUND

Automated analysis of data and correct transmission of said data can be challenging due to the complexity of and multiplicity of data to be analyzed. Knowing which data should be transmitted to which user can be highly complex due to the unique and individual needs of each user—a problem exacerbated by the burgeoning volume of data available for analysis. Transmissions to incorrect professionals can lead to inaccuracies within systems, waste time trying to correct cumbersome issues, and ultimately frustrate users.

SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

In an aspect, a system for an artificial intelligence behavior modification support network includes at least a server. The at least a server is configured to receive at least a biological extraction from a user, generate a diagnostic output based on the at least a biological extraction using a machine-learning process, the diagnostic output including at least an ameliorative process label, generate at least a request for a behavior modification as a function of the at least an ameliorative process label, and identify an influencer as a function of the at least a request for a behavior modification. Identifying the at least an influencer further includes determining a plurality of influencers based on the request for behavior modification, receiving, for each influencer of the plurality of influencers, a set of influencer attributes, and matching a set of user attributes to a set of influencer attributes corresponding to the influencer.

In another aspect, a method of implementing an artificial intelligence support network for behavior modification includes receiving, by at least a server, at least a biological extraction from a user. The method includes generating, by the at least a server, a diagnostic output based on the at least a biological extraction using a machine-learning process, the diagnostic output including at least an ameliorative process label. The method includes generating, by the at least a server, at least a request for a behavior modification as a function of the at least an ameliorative process label. The method includes identifying, by the at least a server, an influencer as a function of the at least a request for a behavior modification. Identifying the at least an influencer further includes determining a plurality of influencers based on the request for behavior modification, receiving, for each influencer of the plurality of influencers, a set of influencer attributes, and matching a set of user attributes to a set of influencer attributes corresponding to the influencer.

These and other aspects and features of non-limiting embodiments of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon review of the following description of specific non-limiting embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For the purpose of illustrating the invention, the drawings show aspects of one or more embodiments of the invention. However, it should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown in the drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of an artificial intelligence advisory system for vibrant constitutional guidance;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a diagnostic engine;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating embodiments of data storage facilities for use in disclosed systems and methods;

FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a biological extraction database;

FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of an expert knowledge database;

FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a prognostic label database;

FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of an ameliorative process label database;

FIG. 8 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a prognostic label learner and associated system elements;

FIG. 9 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of an ameliorative process label learner and associated system elements;

FIG. 10 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a plan generator module and associated system elements;

FIG. 11 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a prognostic label classification database;

FIG. 12 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of an ameliorative process label classification database;

FIG. 13 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a narrative language database;

FIG. 14 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of an image database;

FIG. 15 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a user database;

FIG. 16 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of an advisory module and associated system elements;

FIG. 17 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a prognostic support network;

FIG. 18 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of an artificial intelligence advisor and associated system elements;

FIG. 19 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a default response database;

FIG. 20 is a flow diagram illustrating an exemplary method of vibrant constitutional guidance using an artificial intelligence prognostic support network;

FIG. 21 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of an advisory database;

FIG. 22 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of an influencer module;

FIG. 23 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of an influencer database;

FIG. 24 is a flow diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a method of an artificial intelligence user behavior modification support system; and

FIG. 25 is a block diagram of a computing system that can be used to implement any one or more of the methodologies disclosed herein and any one or more portions thereof.

The drawings are not necessarily to scale and may be illustrated by phantom lines, diagrammatic representations and fragmentary views. In certain instances, details that are not necessary for an understanding of the embodiments or that render other details difficult to perceive may have been omitted.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Systems and methods are provided for machine-learning processing of heterogenous prognostic, ameliorative, and linguistic datasets. In an embodiment, a prognostic label learner may classify biological extraction data to prognostic labels. An ameliorative process label learner may classify prognostic labels to ameliorative processes. Prognostic label leaner and/or ameliorative process label learner are used to generate a diagnostic output using at least a biological extraction. An advisor module generates an advisory output using the diagnostic output; advisor module may receive additional inputs, which may trigger additional processing.

Referring now to the drawings, FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of an artificial intelligence advisory support system 100 for vibrant constitutional guidance. Artificial intelligence advisory system includes at least a server 104. At least a server 104 may include any computing device as described below in reference to FIG. 25, including without limitation a microcontroller, microprocessor, digital signal processor (DSP) and/or system on a chip (SoC) as described below in reference to FIG. 20. At least a server 104 may be housed with, may be incorporated in, or may incorporate one or more sensors of at least a sensor. Computing device may include, be included in, and/or communicate with a mobile device such as a mobile telephone or smartphone. At least a server 104 may include a single computing device operating independently, or may include two or more computing device operating in concert, in parallel, sequentially or the like; two or more computing devices may be included together in a single computing device or in two or more computing devices. At least a server 104 with one or more additional devices as described below in further detail via a network interface device. Network interface device may be utilized for connecting a at least a server 104 to one or more of a variety of networks, and one or more devices. Examples of a network interface device include, but are not limited to, a network interface card (e.g., a mobile network interface card, a LAN card), a modem, and any combination thereof. Examples of a network include, but are not limited to, a wide area network (e.g., the Internet, an enterprise network), a local area network (e.g., a network associated with an office, a building, a campus or other relatively small geographic space), a telephone network, a data network associated with a telephone/voice provider (e.g., a mobile communications provider data and/or voice network), a direct connection between two computing devices, and any combinations thereof. A network may employ a wired and/or a wireless mode of communication. In general, any network topology may be used. Information (e.g., data, software etc.) may be communicated to and/or from a computer and/or a computing device. At least a server 104 may include but is not limited to, for example, a at least a server 104 or cluster of computing devices in a first location and a second computing device or cluster of computing devices in a second location. At least a server 104 may include one or more computing devices dedicated to data storage, security, distribution of traffic for load balancing, and the like. At least a server 104 may distribute one or more computing tasks as described below across a plurality of computing devices of computing device, which may operate in parallel, in series, redundantly, or in any other manner used for distribution of tasks or memory between computing devices. At least a server 104 may be implemented using a “shared nothing” architecture in which data is cached at the worker, in an embodiment, this may enable scalability of system 100 and/or computing device.

Still referring to FIG. 1, system 100 includes a diagnostic engine 108 operating on the at least a server 104, wherein the diagnostic engine 108 configured to receive at least a biological extraction from a user and generate a diagnostic output, the diagnostic output including at least a prognostic label and at least an ameliorative process label. At least a server 104, diagnostic engine 108, and/or one or more modules operating thereon may be designed and/or configured to perform any method, method step, or sequence of method steps in any embodiment described in this disclosure, in any order and with any degree of repetition. For instance, at least a server 104 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may be configured to perform a single step or sequence repeatedly until a desired or commanded outcome is achieved; repetition of a step or a sequence of steps may be performed iteratively and/or recursively using outputs of previous repetitions as inputs to subsequent repetitions, aggregating inputs and/or outputs of repetitions to produce an aggregate result, reduction or decrement of one or more variables such as global variables, and/or division of a larger processing task into a set of iteratively addressed smaller processing tasks. At least a server 104 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may perform any step or sequence of steps as described in this disclosure in parallel, such as simultaneously and/or substantially simultaneously performing a step two or more times using two or more parallel threads, processor cores, or the like; division of tasks between parallel threads and/or processes may be performed according to any protocol suitable for division of tasks between iterations. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which steps, sequences of steps, processing tasks, and/or data may be subdivided, shared, or otherwise dealt with using iteration, recursion, and/or parallel processing.

Referring now to FIG. 2, at least a server 104 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may be designed and configured to receive training data. Training data, as used herein, is data containing correlation that a machine-learning process may use to model relationships between two or more categories of data elements. For instance, and without limitation, training data may include a plurality of data entries, each entry representing a set of data elements that were recorded, received, and/or generated together; data elements may be correlated by shared existence in a given data entry, by proximity in a given data entry, or the like. Multiple data entries in training data may evince one or more trends in correlations between categories of data elements; for instance, and without limitation, a higher value of a first data element belonging to a first category of data element may tend to correlate to a higher value of a second data element belonging to a second category of data element, indicating a possible proportional or other mathematical relationship linking values belonging to the two categories. Multiple categories of data elements may be related in training data according to various correlations; correlations may indicate causative and/or predictive links between categories of data elements, which may be modeled as relationships such as mathematical relationships by machine-learning processes as described in further detail below. Training data may be formatted and/or organized by categories of data elements, for instance by associating data elements with one or more descriptors corresponding to categories of data elements. As a non-limiting example, training data may include data entered in standardized forms by persons or processes, such that entry of a given data element in a given field in a form may be mapped to one or more descriptors of categories. Elements in training data may be linked to descriptors of categories by tags, tokens, or other data elements; for instance, and without limitation, training data may be provided in fixed-length formats, formats linking positions of data to categories such as comma-separated value (CSV) formats and/or self-describing formats such as extensible markup language (XML), enabling processes or devices to detect categories of data.

Alternatively or additionally, and still referring to FIG. 2, training data may include one or more elements that are not categorized; that is, training data may not be formatted or contain descriptors for some elements of data. Machine-learning algorithms and/or other processes may sort training data according to one or more categorizations using, for instance, natural language processing algorithms, tokenization, detection of correlated values in raw data and the like; categories may be generated using correlation and/or other processing algorithms. As a non-limiting example, in a corpus of text, phrases making up a number “n” of compound words, such as nouns modified by other nouns, may be identified according to a statistically significant prevalence of n-grams containing such words in a particular order; such an n-gram may be categorized as an element of language such as a “word” to be tracked similarly to single words, generating a new category as a result of statistical analysis. Similarly, in a data entry including some textual data, a person's name and/or a description of a medical condition or therapy may be identified by reference to a list, dictionary, or other compendium of terms, permitting ad-hoc categorization by machine-learning algorithms, and/or automated association of data in the data entry with descriptors or into a given format. The ability to categorize data entries automatedly may enable the same training data to be made applicable for two or more distinct machine-learning algorithms as described in further detail below.

Still referring to FIG. 2, categorization device may be configured to receive a first training set 200 including a plurality of first data entries, each first data entry of the first training set 200 including at least an element of physiological state data 204 and at least a correlated first prognostic label 208. At least an element of physiological state data 204 may include any data indicative of a person's physiological state; physiological state may be evaluated with regard to one or more measures of health of a person's body, one or more systems within a person's body such as a circulatory system, a digestive system, a nervous system, or the like, one or more organs within a person's body, and/or any other subdivision of a person's body useful for diagnostic or prognostic purposes. Physiological state data 204 may include, without limitation, hematological data, such as red blood cell count, which may include a total number of red blood cells in a person's blood and/or in a blood sample, hemoglobin levels, hematocrit representing a percentage of blood in a person and/or sample that is composed of red blood cells, mean corpuscular volume, which may be an estimate of the average red blood cell size, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, which may measure average weight of hemoglobin per red blood cell, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, which may measure an average concentration of hemoglobin in red blood cells, platelet count, mean platelet volume which may measure the average size of platelets, red blood cell distribution width, which measures variation in red blood cell size, absolute neutrophils, which measures the number of neutrophil white blood cells, absolute quantities of lymphocytes such as B-cells, T-cells, Natural Killer Cells, and the like, absolute numbers of monocytes including macrophage precursors, absolute numbers of eosinophils, and/or absolute counts of basophils. Physiological state data 204 may include, without limitation, immune function data such as Interleukine-6 (IL-6), TNF-alpha, systemic inflammatory cytokines, and the like.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 2, physiological state data 204 may include, without limitation, data describing blood-born lipids, including total cholesterol levels, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol levels, levels of triglycerides, and/or any other quantity of any blood-born lipid or lipid-containing substance. Physiological state data 204 may include measures of glucose metabolism such as fasting glucose levels and/or hemoglobin A1-C (HbA1c) levels. Physiological state data 204 may include, without limitation, one or more measures associated with endocrine function, such as without limitation, quantities of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEAS), DHEA-Sulfate, quantities of cortisol, ratio of DHEAS to cortisol, quantities of testosterone quantities of estrogen, quantities of growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), quantities of adipokines such as adiponectin, leptin, and/or ghrelin, quantities of somatostatin, progesterone, or the like. Physiological state data 204 may include measures of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Physiological state data 204 may include quantities of C-reactive protein, estradiol, ferritin, folate, homocysteine, prostate-specific Ag, thyroid-stimulating hormone, vitamin D, 25 hydroxy, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, sodium, potassium, chloride, carbon dioxide, uric acid, albumin, globulin, calcium, phosphorus, alkaline photophatase, alanine amino transferase, aspartate amino transferase, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), iron, and/or total iron binding capacity (TIBC), or the like. Physiological state data 204 may include antinuclear antibody levels. Physiological state data 204 may include aluminum levels. Physiological state data 204 may include arsenic levels. Physiological state data 204 may include levels of fibrinogen, plasma cystatin C, and/or brain natriuretic peptide.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 2, physiological state data 204 may include measures of lung function such as forced expiratory volume, one second (FEV-1) which measures how much air can be exhaled in one second following a deep inhalation, forced vital capacity (FVC), which measures the volume of air that may be contained in the lungs. Physiological state data 204 may include a measurement blood pressure, including without limitation systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Physiological state data 204 may include a measure of waist circumference. Physiological state data 204 may include body mass index (BMI). Physiological state data 204 may include one or more measures of bone mass and/or density such as dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Physiological state data 204 may include one or more measures of muscle mass. Physiological state data 204 may include one or more measures of physical capability such as without limitation measures of grip strength, evaluations of standing balance, evaluations of gait speed, pegboard tests, timed up and go tests, and/or chair rising tests.

Still viewing FIG. 2, physiological state data 204 may include one or more measures of cognitive function, including without limitation Rey auditory verbal learning test results, California verbal learning test results, NIH toolbox picture sequence memory test, Digital symbol coding evaluations, and/or Verbal fluency evaluations. Physiological state data 204 may include one or more measures of psychological function or state, such as without limitation clinical interviews, assessments of intellectual functioning and/or intelligence quotient (IQ) tests, personality assessments, and/or behavioral assessments. Physiological state data 204 may include one or more psychological self-assessments, which may include any self-administered and/or automatedly computer-administered assessments, whether administered within system 100 and/or via a third-party service or platform.

With continued reference to FIG. 2, physiological state data 204 may include one or more evaluations of sensory ability, including measures of audition, vision, olfaction, gustation, vestibular function and pain. Physiological state data 204 may include genomic data, including deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) samples and/or sequences, such as without limitation DNA sequences contained in one or more chromosomes in human cells. Genomic data may include, without limitation, ribonucleic acid (RNA) samples and/or sequences, such as samples and/or sequences of messenger RNA (mRNA) or the like taken from human cells. Genetic data may include telomere lengths. Genomic data may include epigenetic data including data describing one or more states of methylation of genetic material. Physiological state data 204 may include proteomic data, which as used herein is data describing all proteins produced and/or modified by an organism, colony of organisms, or system of organisms, and/or a subset thereof. Physiological state data 204 may include data concerning a microbiome of a person, which as used herein includes any data describing any microorganism and/or combination of microorganisms living on or within a person, including without limitation biomarkers, genomic data, proteomic data, and/or any other metabolic or biochemical data useful for analysis of the effect of such microorganisms on other physiological state data 204 of a person, and/or on prognostic labels and/or ameliorative processes as described in further detail below. Physiological state data 204 may include any physiological state data 204, as described above, describing any multicellular organism living in or on a person including any parasitic and/or symbiotic organisms living in or on the persons; non-limiting examples may include mites, nematodes, flatworms, or the like. Examples of physiological state data 204 described in this disclosure are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not meant to be exhaustive. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various additional examples of physiological state data 204 that may be used consistently with descriptions of systems and methods as provided in this disclosure.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 2, each element of first training set 200 includes at least a first prognostic label 208. A prognostic label, as described herein, is an element of data identifying and/or describing a current, incipient, or probable future medical condition affecting a person; medical condition may include a particular disease, one or more symptoms associated with a syndrome, a syndrome, and/or any other measure of current or future health and/or heathy aging. At least a prognostic label may be associated with a physical and/or somatic condition, a mental condition such as a mental illness, neurosis, or the like, or any other condition affecting human health that may be associated with one or more elements of physiological state data 204 as described in further detail below. Conditions associated with prognostic labels may include, without limitation one or more diseases, defined for purposes herein as conditions that negatively affect structure and/or function of part or all of an organism. Conditions associated with prognostic labels may include, without limitation, acute or chronic infections, including without limitation infections by bacteria, archaea, viruses, viroids, prions, single-celled eukaryotic organisms such as amoeba, paramecia, trypanosomes, plasmodia, leishmania, and/or fungi, and/or multicellular parasites such as nematodes, arthropods, fungi, or the like. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more immune disorders, including without limitation immunodeficiencies and/or auto-immune conditions. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more metabolic disorders. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more endocrinal disorders. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more cardiovascular disorders. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more respiratory disorders. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more disorders affecting connective tissue. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more digestive disorders. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more neurological disorders such as neuromuscular disorders, dementia, or the like. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more disorders of the excretory system, including without limitation nephrological disorders. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more liver disorders. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more disorders of the bones such as osteoporosis. Prognostic labels may be associated with one or more disorders affecting joints, such as osteoarthritis, gout, and/or rheumatoid arthritis. Prognostic labels be associated with one or more cancers, including without limitation carcinomas, lymphomas, leukemias, germ cell tumor cancers, blastomas, and/or sarcomas. Prognostic labels may include descriptors of latent, dormant, and/or apparent disorders, diseases, and/or conditions. Prognostic labels may include descriptors of conditions for which a person may have a higher than average probability of development, such as a condition for which a person may have a “risk factor”; for instance, a person currently suffering from abdominal obesity may have a higher than average probability of developing type II diabetes. The above-described examples are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be exhaustive. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various additional examples of conditions that may be associated with prognostic labels as described in this disclosure.

Still referring to FIG. 2, at least a prognostic label may be stored in any suitable data and/or data type. For instance, and without limitation, at least a prognostic label may include textual data, such as numerical, character, and/or string data. Textual data may include a standardized name and/or code for a disease, disorder, or the like; codes may include diagnostic codes and/or diagnosis codes, which may include without limitation codes used in diagnosis classification systems such as The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD). In general, there is no limitation on forms textual data or non-textual data used as at least a prognostic label may take; persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various forms which may be suitable for use as at least a prognostic label consistently with this disclosure.

With continued reference to FIG. 2, in each first data element of first training set 200, at least a first prognostic label 208 of the data element is correlated with at least an element of physiological state data 204 of the data element. In an embodiment, an element of physiological data is correlated with a prognostic label where the element of physiological data is located in the same data element and/or portion of data element as the prognostic label; for example, and without limitation, an element of physiological data is correlated with a prognostic element where both element of physiological data and prognostic element are contained within the same first data element of the first training set 200. As a further example, an element of physiological data is correlated with a prognostic element where both share a category label as described in further detail below, where each is within a certain distance of the other within an ordered collection of data in data element, or the like. Still further, an element of physiological data may be correlated with a prognostic label where the element of physiological data and the prognostic label share an origin, such as being data that was collected with regard to a single person or the like. In an embodiment, a first datum may be more closely correlated with a second datum in the same data element than with a third datum contained in the same data element; for instance, the first element and the second element may be closer to each other in an ordered set of data than either is to the third element, the first element and second element may be contained in the same subdivision and/or section of data while the third element is in a different subdivision and/or section of data, or the like. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various forms and/or degrees of correlation between physiological data and prognostic labels that may exist in first training set 200 and/or first data element consistently with this disclosure.

In an embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 may be designed and configured to associate at least an element of physiological state data 204 with at least a category from a list of significant categories of physiological state data 204. Significant categories of physiological state data 204 may include labels and/or descriptors describing types of physiological state data 204 that are identified as being of high relevance in identifying prognostic labels. As a non-limiting example, one or more categories may identify significant categories of physiological state data 204 based on degree of diagnostic relevance to one or more impactful conditions and/or within one or more medical or public health fields. For instance, and without limitation, a particular set of biomarkers, test results, and/or biochemical information may be recognized in a given medical field as useful for identifying various disease conditions or prognoses within a relevant field. As a non-limiting example, and without limitation, physiological data describing red blood cells, such as red blood cell count, hemoglobin levels, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, and/or mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration may be recognized as useful for identifying various conditions such as dehydration, high testosterone, nutrient deficiencies, kidney dysfunction, chronic inflammation, anemia, and/or blood loss. As an additional example, hemoglobin levels may be useful for identifying elevated testosterone, poor oxygen deliverability, thiamin deficiency, insulin resistance, anemia, liver disease, hypothyroidism, arginine deficiency, protein deficiency, inflammation, and/or nutrient deficiencies. In a further non-limiting example, hematocrit may be useful for identifying dehydration, elevated testosterone, poor oxygen defiverability, thiamin deficiency, insulin resistance, anemia, liver disease, hypothyroidism, arginine deficiency, protein deficiency, inflammation, and/or nutrient deficiencies. Similarly, measures of lipid levels in blood, such as total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, VLDL, triglycerides, LDL-C and/or HDL-C may be recognized as useful in identifying conditions such as poor thyroid function, insulin resistance, blood glucose dysregulation, magnesium deficiency, dehydration, kidney disease, familial hypercholesterolemia, liver dysfunction, oxidative stress, inflammation, malabsorption, anemia, alcohol abuse, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, coronary artery disease, atherosclerosis, or the like. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various additional categories of physiological data that may be used consistently with this disclosure.

Still referring to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 may receive the list of significant categories according to any suitable process; for instance, and without limitation, diagnostic engine 108 may receive the list of significant categories from at least an expert. In an embodiment, diagnostic engine 108 and/or a user device connected to diagnostic engine 108 may provide a graphical user interface, which may include without limitation a form or other graphical element having data entry fields, wherein one or more experts, including without limitation clinical and/or scientific experts, may enter information describing one or more categories of physiological data that the experts consider to be significant or useful for detection of conditions; fields in graphical user interface may provide options describing previously identified categories, which may include a comprehensive or near-comprehensive list of types of physiological data detectable using known or recorded testing methods, for instance in “drop-down” lists, where experts may be able to select one or more entries to indicate their usefulness and/or significance in the opinion of the experts. Fields may include free-form entry fields such as text-entry fields where an expert may be able to type or otherwise enter text, enabling expert to propose or suggest categories not currently recorded. Graphical user interface or the like may include fields corresponding to prognostic labels, where experts may enter data describing prognostic labels and/or categories of prognostic labels the experts consider related to entered categories of physiological data; for instance, such fields may include drop-down lists or other pre-populated data entry fields listing currently recorded prognostic labels, and which may be comprehensive, permitting each expert to select a prognostic label and/or a plurality of prognostic labels the expert believes to be predicted and/or associated with each category of physiological data selected by the expert. Fields for entry of prognostic labels and/or categories of prognostic labels may include free-form data entry fields such as text entry fields; as described above, examiners may enter data not presented in pre-populated data fields in the free-form data entry fields. Alternatively or additionally, fields for entry of prognostic labels may enable an expert to select and/or enter information describing or linked to a category of prognostic label that the expert considers significant, where significance may indicate likely impact on longevity, mortality, quality of life, or the like as described in further detail below. Graphical user interface may provide an expert with a field in which to indicate a reference to a document describing significant categories of physiological data, relationships of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or significant categories of prognostic labels. Any data described above may alternatively or additionally be received from experts similarly organized in paper form, which may be captured and entered into data in a similar way, or in a textual form such as a portable document file (PDF) with examiner entries, or the like

Referring again to FIG. 2, data information describing significant categories of physiological data, relationships of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or significant categories of prognostic labels may alternatively or additionally be extracted from one or more documents using a language processing module 216. Language processing module 216 may include any hardware and/or software module. Language processing module 216 may be configured to extract, from the one or more documents, one or more words. One or more words may include, without limitation, strings of one or characters, including without limitation any sequence or sequences of letters, numbers, punctuation, diacritic marks, engineering symbols, geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T) symbols, chemical symbols and formulas, spaces, whitespace, and other symbols, including any symbols usable as textual data as described above. Textual data may be parsed into tokens, which may include a simple word (sequence of letters separated by whitespace) or more generally a sequence of characters as described previously. The term “token,” as used herein, refers to any smaller, individual groupings of text from a larger source of text; tokens may be broken up by word, pair of words, sentence, or other delimitation. These tokens may in turn be parsed in various ways. Textual data may be parsed into words or sequences of words, which may be considered words as well. Textual data may be parsed into “n-grams”, where all sequences of n consecutive characters are considered. Any or all possible sequences of tokens or words may be stored as “chains”, for example for use as a Markov chain or Hidden Markov Model.

Still referring to FIG. 2, language processing module 216 may compare extracted words to categories of physiological data recorded at diagnostic engine 108, one or more prognostic labels recorded at diagnostic engine 108, and/or one or more categories of prognostic labels recorded at diagnostic engine 108; such data for comparison may be entered on diagnostic engine 108 as described above using expert data inputs or the like. In an embodiment, one or more categories may be enumerated, to find total count of mentions in such documents. Alternatively or additionally, language processing module 216 may operate to produce a language processing model. Language processing model may include a program automatically generated by diagnostic engine 108 and/or language processing module 216 to produce associations between one or more words extracted from at least a document and detect associations, including without limitation mathematical associations, between such words, and/or associations of extracted words with categories of physiological data, relationships of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or categories of prognostic labels. Associations between language elements, where language elements include for purposes herein extracted words, categories of physiological data, relationships of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or categories of prognostic labels may include, without limitation, mathematical associations, including without limitation statistical correlations between any language element and any other language element and/or language elements. Statistical correlations and/or mathematical associations may include probabilistic formulas or relationships indicating, for instance, a likelihood that a given extracted word indicates a given category of physiological data, a given relationship of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or a given category of prognostic labels. As a further example, statistical correlations and/or mathematical associations may include probabilistic formulas or relationships indicating a positive and/or negative association between at least an extracted word and/or a given category of physiological data, a given relationship of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or a given category of prognostic labels; positive or negative indication may include an indication that a given document is or is not indicating a category of physiological data, relationship of such category to prognostic labels, and/or category of prognostic labels is or is not significant. For instance, and without limitation, a negative indication may be determined from a phrase such as “telomere length was not found to be an accurate predictor of overall longevity,” whereas a positive indication may be determined from a phrase such as “telomere length was found to be an accurate predictor of dementia,” as an illustrative example; whether a phrase, sentence, word, or other textual element in a document or corpus of documents constitutes a positive or negative indicator may be determined, in an embodiment, by mathematical associations between detected words, comparisons to phrases and/or words indicating positive and/or negative indicators that are stored in memory at diagnostic engine 108, or the like.

Still referring to FIG. 2, language processing module 216 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may generate the language processing model by any suitable method, including without limitation a natural language processing classification algorithm; language processing model may include a natural language process classification model that enumerates and/or derives statistical relationships between input term and output terms. Algorithm to generate language processing model may include a stochastic gradient descent algorithm, which may include a method that iteratively optimizes an objective function, such as an objective function representing a statistical estimation of relationships between terms, including relationships between input terms and output terms, in the form of a sum of relationships to be estimated. In an alternative or additional approach, sequential tokens may be modeled as chains, serving as the observations in a Hidden Markov Model (HMM). HMMs as used herein are statistical models with inference algorithms that that may be applied to the models. In such models, a hidden state to be estimated may include an association between an extracted word category of physiological data, a given relationship of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or a given category of prognostic labels. There may be a finite number of category of physiological data, a given relationship of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or a given category of prognostic labels to which an extracted word may pertain; an HMM inference algorithm, such as the forward-backward algorithm or the Viterbi algorithm, may be used to estimate the most likely discrete state given a word or sequence of words. Language processing module 216 may combine two or more approaches. For instance, and without limitation, machine-learning program may use a combination of Naive-Bayes (NB), Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), and parameter grid-searching classification techniques; the result may include a classification algorithm that returns ranked associations.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 2, generating language processing model may include generating a vector space, which may be a collection of vectors, defined as a set of mathematical objects that can be added together under an operation of addition following properties of associativity, commutativity, existence of an identity element, and existence of an inverse element for each vector, and can be multiplied by scalar values under an operation of scalar multiplication compatible with field multiplication, and that has an identity element is distributive with respect to vector addition, and is distributive with respect to field addition. Each vector in an n-dimensional vector space may be represented by an n-tuple of numerical values. Each unique extracted word and/or language element as described above may be represented by a vector of the vector space. In an embodiment, each unique extracted and/or other language element may be represented by a dimension of vector space; as a non-limiting example, each element of a vector may include a number representing an enumeration of co-occurrences of the word and/or language element represented by the vector with another word and/or language element. Vectors may be normalized, scaled according to relative frequencies of appearance and/or file sizes. In an embodiment associating language elements to one another as described above may include computing a degree of vector similarity between a vector representing each language element and a vector representing another language element; vector similarity may be measured according to any norm for proximity and/or similarity of two vectors, including without limitation cosine similarity, which measures the similarity of two vectors by evaluating the cosine of the angle between the vectors, which can be computed using a dot product of the two vectors divided by the lengths of the two vectors. Degree of similarity may include any other geometric measure of distance between vectors.

Still referring to FIG. 2, language processing module 216 may use a corpus of documents to generate associations between language elements in a language processing module 216, and diagnostic engine 108 may then use such associations to analyze words extracted from one or more documents and determine that the one or more documents indicate significance of a category of physiological data, a given relationship of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or a given category of prognostic labels. In an embodiment, diagnostic engine 108 may perform this analysis using a selected set of significant documents, such as documents identified by one or more experts as representing good science, good clinical analysis, or the like; experts may identify or enter such documents via graphical user interface as described above in reference to FIG. 9, or may communicate identities of significant documents according to any other suitable method of electronic communication, or by providing such identity to other persons who may enter such identifications into diagnostic engine 108. Documents may be entered into diagnostic engine 108 by being uploaded by an expert or other persons using, without limitation, file transfer protocol (FTP) or other suitable methods for transmission and/or upload of documents; alternatively or additionally, where a document is identified by a citation, a uniform resource identifier (URI), uniform resource locator (URL) or other datum permitting unambiguous identification of the document, diagnostic engine 108 may automatically obtain the document using such an identifier, for instance by submitting a request to a database or compendium of documents such as JSTOR as provided by Ithaka Harbors, Inc. of New York.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 2, whether an entry indicating significance of a category of physiological data, a given relationship of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or a given category of prognostic labels is entered via graphical user interface, alternative submission means, and/or extracted from a document or body of documents as described above, an entry or entries may be aggregated to indicate an overall degree of significance. For instance, each category of physiological data, relationship of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or category of prognostic labels may be given an overall significance score; overall significance score may, for instance, be incremented each time an expert submission and/or paper indicates significance as described above. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure will be aware of other ways in which scores may be generated using a plurality of entries, including averaging, weighted averaging, normalization, and the like. Significance scores may be ranked; that is, all categories of physiological data, relationships of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or categories of prognostic labels may be ranked according significance scores, for instance by ranking categories of physiological data, relationships of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or categories of prognostic labels higher according to higher significance scores and lower according to lower significance scores. Categories of physiological data, relationships of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or categories of prognostic labels may be eliminated from current use if they fail a threshold comparison, which may include a comparison of significance score to a threshold number, a requirement that significance score belong to a given portion of ranking such as a threshold percentile, quartile, or number of top-ranked scores. Significance scores may be used to filter outputs as described in further detail below; for instance, where a number of outputs are generated and automated selection of a smaller number of outputs is desired, outputs corresponding to higher significance scores may be identified as more probable and/or selected for presentation while other outputs corresponding to lower significance scores may be eliminated. Alternatively or additionally, significance scores may be calculated per sample type; for instance, entries by experts, documents, and/or descriptions of purposes of a given type of physiological test or sample collection as described above may indicate that for that type of physiological test or sample collection a first category of physiological data, relationship of such category to prognostic labels, and/or category of prognostic labels is significant with regard to that test, while a second category of physiological data, relationship of such category to prognostic labels, and/or category of prognostic labels is not significant; such indications may be used to perform a significance score for each category of physiological data, relationship of such category to prognostic labels, and/or category of prognostic labels is or is not significant per type of biological extraction, which then may be subjected to ranking, comparison to thresholds and/or elimination as described above.

Still referring to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 may detect further significant categories of physiological data, relationships of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or categories of prognostic labels using machine-learning processes, including without limitation unsupervised machine-learning processes as described in further detail below; such newly identified categories, as well as categories entered by experts in free-form fields as described above, may be added to pre-populated lists of categories, lists used to identify language elements for language learning module, and/or lists used to identify and/or score categories detected in documents, as described above.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 2, in an embodiment, diagnostic engine 108 may be configured, for instance as part of receiving the first training set 200, to associate at least correlated first prognostic label 208 with at least a category from a list of significant categories of prognostic labels. Significant categories of prognostic labels may be acquired, determined, and/or ranked as described above. As a non-limiting example, prognostic labels may be organized according to relevance to and/or association with a list of significant conditions. A list of significant conditions may include, without limitation, conditions having generally acknowledged impact on longevity and/or quality of life; this may be determined, as a non-limiting example, by a product of relative frequency of a condition within the population with years of life and/or years of able-bodied existence lost, on average, as a result of the condition. A list of conditions may be modified for a given person to reflect a family history of the person; for instance, a person with a significant family history of a particular condition or set of conditions, or a genetic profile having a similarly significant association therewith, may have a higher probability of developing such conditions than a typical person from the general population, and as a result diagnostic engine 108 may modify list of significant categories to reflect this difference.

Still referring to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 is designed and configured to receive a second training set 220 including a plurality of second data entries. Each second data entry of the second training set 220 includes at least a second prognostic label 224; at least a second prognostic label 224 may include any label suitable for use as at least a first prognostic label 208 as described above. Each second data entry of the second training set 220 includes at least an ameliorative process label 228 correlated with the at least a second prognostic label 224, where correlation may include any correlation suitable for correlation of at least a first prognostic label 208 to at least an element of physiological data as described above. As used herein, an ameliorative process label 228 is an identifier, which may include any form of identifier suitable for use as a prognostic label as described above, identifying a process that tends to improve a physical condition of a user, where a physical condition of a user may include, without limitation, any physical condition identifiable using a prognostic label. Ameliorative processes may include, without limitation, exercise programs, including amount, intensity, and/or types of exercise recommended. Ameliorative processes may include, without limitation, dietary or nutritional recommendations based on data including nutritional content, digestibility, or the like. Ameliorative processes may include one or more medical procedures. Ameliorative processes may include one or more physical, psychological, or other therapies. Ameliorative processes may include one or more medications. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various processes that may be used as ameliorative processes consistently with this disclosure.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 2, in an embodiment diagnostic engine 108 may be configured, for instance as part of receiving second training set 220, to associate the at least second prognostic label 224 with at least a category from a list of significant categories of prognostic labels. This may be performed as described above for use of lists of significant categories with regard to at least a first prognostic label 208. Significance may be determined, and/or association with at least a category, may be performed for prognostic labels in first training set 200 according to a first process as described above and for prognostic labels in second training set 220 according to a second process as described above.

Still referring to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 may be configured, for instance as part of receiving second training set 220, to associate at least a correlated ameliorative process label 228 with at least a category from a list of significant categories of ameliorative process labels 228. In an embodiment, diagnostic engine 108 and/or a user device connected to diagnostic engine 108 may provide a second graphical user interface 232 which may include without limitation a form or other graphical element having data entry fields, wherein one or more experts, including without limitation clinical and/or scientific experts, may enter information describing one or more categories of prognostic labels that the experts consider to be significant as described above; fields in graphical user interface may provide options describing previously identified categories, which may include a comprehensive or near-comprehensive list of types of prognostic labels, for instance in “drop-down” lists, where experts may be able to select one or more entries to indicate their usefulness and/or significance in the opinion of the experts. Fields may include free-form entry fields such as text-entry fields where an expert may be able to type or otherwise enter text, enabling expert to propose or suggest categories not currently recorded. Graphical user interface or the like may include fields corresponding to ameliorative labels, where experts may enter data describing ameliorative labels and/or categories of ameliorative labels the experts consider related to entered categories of prognostic labels; for instance, such fields may include drop-down lists or other pre-populated data entry fields listing currently recorded ameliorative labels, and which may be comprehensive, permitting each expert to select an ameliorative label and/or a plurality of ameliorative labels the expert believes to be predicted and/or associated with each category of prognostic labels selected by the expert. Fields for entry of ameliorative labels and/or categories of ameliorative labels may include free-form data entry fields such as text entry fields; as described above, examiners may enter data not presented in pre-populated data fields in the free-form data entry fields. Alternatively or additionally, fields for entry of ameliorative labels may enable an expert to select and/or enter information describing or linked to a category of ameliorative label that the expert considers significant, where significance may indicate likely impact on longevity, mortality, quality of life, or the like as described in further detail below. Graphical user interface may provide an expert with a field in which to indicate a reference to a document describing significant categories of prognostic labels, relationships of such categories to ameliorative labels, and/or significant categories of ameliorative labels. Such information may alternatively be entered according to any other suitable means for entry of expert data as described above. Data concerning significant categories of prognostic labels, relationships of such categories to ameliorative labels, and/or significant categories of ameliorative labels may be entered using analysis of documents using language processing module 216 or the like as described above.

In an embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 may extract at least a second data entry from one or more documents; extraction may be performed using any language processing method as described above. Diagnostic engine 108 may be configured, for instance as part of receiving second training set 220, to receive at least a document describing at least a medical history and extract at least a second data entry of plurality of second data entries from the at least a document. A medical history document may include, for instance, a document received from an expert and/or medical practitioner describing treatment of a patient; document may be anonymized by removal of one or more patient-identifying features from document. A medical history document may include a case study, such as a case study published in a medical journal or written up by an expert. A medical history document may contain data describing and/or described by a prognostic label; for instance, the medical history document may list a diagnosis that a medical practitioner made concerning the patient, a finding that the patient is at risk for a given condition and/or evinces some precursor state for the condition, or the like. A medical history document may contain data describing and/or described by an ameliorative process label 228; for instance, the medical history document may list a therapy, recommendation, or other ameliorative process that a medical practitioner described or recommended to a patient. A medical history document may describe an outcome; for instance, medical history document may describe an improvement in a condition describing or described by a prognostic label, and/or may describe that the condition did not improve. Prognostic labels, ameliorative process labels 228, and/or efficacy of ameliorative process labels 228 may be extracted from and/or determined from one or more medical history documents using any processes for language processing as described above; for instance, language processing module 216 may perform such processes. As a non-limiting example, positive and/or negative indications regarding ameliorative processes identified in medical history documents may be determined in a manner described above for determination of positive and/or negative indications regarding categories of physiological data, relationships of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or categories of prognostic labels.

With continued reference to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 may be configured, for instance as part of receiving second training set 220, to receiving at least a second data entry of the plurality of second data entries from at least an expert. This may be performed, without limitation using second graphical user interface as described above.

With continued reference to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 may be configured to have a feedback mechanism. In an embodiment, diagnostic engine 108 may be configured to receive a first training set 200 and/or a second training set 220 generated by system 100. For example, data about a user that has been previously been analyzed by diagnostic engine 108 may be utilized in algorithms by first model 240 and/or second model 248. Such algorithms may be continuously updated as a function of such data. In yet another embodiment, data analyzed by language processing module 216 may be utilized as part of training data generating algorithms by first model 240 and/or second model 248 and/or any other machine learning process performed by diagnostic engine 108.

Referring now to FIG. 3, data incorporated in first training set 200 and/or second training set 220 may be incorporated in one or more databases. As a non-limiting example, one or elements of physiological state data may be stored in and/or retrieved from a biological extraction database 300. A biological extraction database 300 may include any data structure for ordered storage and retrieval of data, which may be implemented as a hardware or software module. A biological extraction database 300 may be implemented, without limitation, as a relational database, a key-value retrieval datastore such as a NOSQL database, or any other format or structure for use as a datastore that a person skilled in the art would recognize as suitable upon review of the entirety of this disclosure. A biological extraction database 300 may include a plurality of data entries and/or records corresponding to elements of physiological data as described above. Data entries and/or records may describe, without limitation, data concerning particular biological extractions that have been collected; entries may describe reasons for collection of samples, such as without limitation one or more conditions being tested for, which may be listed with related prognostic labels. Data entries may include prognostic labels and/or other descriptive entries describing results of evaluation of past biological extractions, including diagnoses that were associated with such samples, prognoses and/or conclusions regarding likelihood of future diagnoses that were associated with such samples, and/or other medical or diagnostic conclusions that were derived. Such conclusions may have been generated by diagnostic engine 108 in previous iterations of methods, with or without validation of correctness by medical professionals. Data entries in a biological extraction database 300 may be flagged with or linked to one or more additional elements of information, which may be reflected in data entry cells and/or in linked tables such as tables related by one or more indices in a relational database; one or more additional elements of information may include data associating a biological extraction and/or a person from whom a biological extraction was extracted or received with one or more cohorts, including demographic groupings such as ethnicity, sex, age, income, geographical region, or the like, one or more common diagnoses or physiological attributes shared with other persons having biological extractions reflected in other data entries, or the like. Additional elements of information may include one or more categories of physiological data as described above. Additional elements of information may include descriptions of particular methods used to obtain biological extractions, such as without limitation physical extraction of blood samples or the like, capture of data with one or more sensors, and/or any other information concerning provenance and/or history of data acquisition. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which data entries in a biological extraction database 300 may reflect categories, cohorts, and/or populations of data consistently with this disclosure.

Referring now to FIG. 4, one or more database tables in biological extraction database 300 may include, as a non-limiting example, a prognostic link table 400. Prognostic link table 400 may be a table relating biological extraction data as described above to prognostic labels; for instance, where an expert has entered data relating a prognostic label to a category of biological extraction data and/or to an element of biological extraction data via first graphical user interface 212 as described above, one or more rows recording such an entry may be inserted in prognostic link table 400. Alternatively or additionally, linking of prognostic labels to biological extraction data may be performed entirely in a prognostic label database as described below.

With continued reference to FIG. 4, biological extraction database 300 may include tables listing one or more samples according to sample source. For instance, and without limitation, biological extraction database 300 may include a fluid sample table 404 listing samples acquired from a person by extraction of fluids, such as without limitation blood, lymph cerebrospinal fluid, or the like. As another non-limiting example, biological extraction database 300 may include a sensor data table 408, which may list samples acquired using one or more sensors, for instance as described in further detail below. As a further non-limiting example, biological extraction database 300 may include a genetic sample table 412, which may list partial or entire sequences of genetic material. Genetic material may be extracted and amplified, as a non-limiting example, using polymerase chain reactions (PCR) or the like. As a further example, also non-limiting, biological extraction database 300 may include a medical report table 416, which may list textual descriptions of medical tests, including without limitation radiological tests or tests of strength and/or dexterity or the like. Data in medical report table may be sorted and/or categorized using a language processing module 412, for instance, translating a textual description into a numerical value and a label corresponding to a category of physiological data; this may be performed using any language processing algorithm or algorithms as referred to in this disclosure. As another non-limiting example, biological extraction database 300 may include a tissue sample table 420, which may record biological extractions obtained using tissue samples. Tables presented above are presented for exemplary purposes only; persons skilled in the art will be aware of various ways in which data may be organized in biological extraction database 300 consistently with this disclosure.

Referring again to FIG. 3, diagnostic engine 108 and/or another device in diagnostic engine 108 may populate one or more fields in biological extraction database 300 using expert information, which may be extracted or retrieved from an expert knowledge database 304. An expert knowledge database 304 may include any data structure and/or data store suitable for use as a biological extraction database 300 as described above. Expert knowledge database 304 may include data entries reflecting one or more expert submissions of data such as may have been submitted according to any process described above in reference to FIG. 2, including without limitation by using first graphical user interface 212 and/or second graphical user interface 232. Expert knowledge database may include one or more fields generated by language processing module 216, such as without limitation fields extracted from one or more documents as described above. For instance, and without limitation, one or more categories of physiological data and/or related prognostic labels and/or categories of prognostic labels associated with an element of physiological state data as described above may be stored in generalized from in an expert knowledge database 304 and linked to, entered in, or associated with entries in a biological extraction database 300. Documents may be stored and/or retrieved by diagnostic engine 108 and/or language processing module 216 in and/or from a document database 308; document database 308 may include any data structure and/or data store suitable for use as biological extraction database 300 as described above. Documents in document database 308 may be linked to and/or retrieved using document identifiers such as URI and/or URL data, citation data, or the like; persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which documents may be indexed and retrieved according to citation, subject matter, author, date, or the like as consistent with this disclosure.

Referring now to FIG. 5, an exemplary embodiment of an expert knowledge database 304 is illustrated. Expert knowledge database 304 may, as a non-limiting example, organize data stored in the expert knowledge database 304 according to one or more database tables. One or more database tables may be linked to one another by, for instance, common column values. For instance, a common column between two tables of expert knowledge database 300 may include an identifier of an expert submission, such as a form entry, textual submission, expert paper, or the like, for instance as defined below; as a result, a query may be able to retrieve all rows from any table pertaining to a given submission or set thereof. Other columns may include any other category usable for organization or subdivision of expert data, including types of expert data, names and/or identifiers of experts submitting the data, times of submission, or the like; persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which expert data from one or more tables may be linked and/or related to expert data in one or more other tables.

Still referring to FIG. 5, one or more database tables in expert knowledge database 304 may include, as a non-limiting example, an expert prognostic table 500. Expert prognostic table 500 may be a table relating biological extraction data as described above to prognostic labels; for instance, where an expert has entered data relating a prognostic label to a category of biological extraction data and/or to an element of biological extraction data via first graphical user interface 212 as described above, one or more rows recording such an entry may be inserted in expert prognostic table 500. In an embodiment, a forms processing module 504 may sort data entered in a submission via first graphical user interface 212 by, for instance, sorting data from entries in the first graphical user interface 212 to related categories of data; for instance, data entered in an entry relating in the first graphical user interface 212 to a prognostic label may be sorted into variables and/or data structures for storage of prognostic labels, while data entered in an entry relating to a category of physiological data and/or an element thereof may be sorted into variables and/or data structures for the storage of, respectively, categories of physiological data or elements of physiological data. Where data is chosen by an expert from pre-selected entries such as drop-down lists, data may be stored directly; where data is entered in textual form, language processing module 216 may be used to map data to an appropriate existing label, for instance using a vector similarity test or other synonym-sensitive language processing test to map physiological data to an existing label. Alternatively or additionally, when a language processing algorithm, such as vector similarity comparison, indicates that an entry is not a synonym of an existing label, language processing module may indicate that entry should be treated as relating to a new label; this may be determined by, e.g., comparison to a threshold number of cosine similarity and/or other geometric measures of vector similarity of the entered text to a nearest existent label, and determination that a degree of similarity falls below the threshold number and/or a degree of dissimilarity falls above the threshold number. Data from expert textual submissions 508, such as accomplished by filling out a paper or PDF form and/or submitting narrative information, may likewise be processed using language processing module 216. Data may be extracted from expert papers 512, which may include without limitation publications in medical and/or scientific journals, by language processing module 216 via any suitable process as described herein. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various additional methods whereby novel terms may be separated from already-classified terms and/or synonyms therefore, as consistent with this disclosure. Expert prognostic table 500 may include a single table and/or a plurality of tables; plurality of tables may include tables for particular categories of prognostic labels such as a current diagnosis table, a future prognosis table, a genetic tendency table, a metabolic tendency table, and/or an endocrinal tendency table (not shown), to name a few non-limiting examples presented for illustrative purposes only.

With continued reference to FIG. 5, one or more database tables in expert knowledge database 304 may include, as a further non-limiting example tables listing one or more ameliorative process labels; expert data populating such tables may be provided, without limitation, using any process described above, including entry of data from second graphical user interface 232 via forms processing module 504 and/or language processing module 216, processing of textual submissions 508, or processing of expert papers 512. For instance, and without limitation, an ameliorative nutrition table 516 may list one or more ameliorative processes based on nutritional instructions, and/or links of such one or more ameliorative processes to prognostic labels, as provided by experts according to any method of processing and/or entering expert data as described above. As a further example an ameliorative action table 520 may list one or more ameliorative processes based on instructions for actions a user should take, including without limitation exercise, meditation, and/or cessation of harmful eating, substance abuse, or other habits, and/or links of such one or more ameliorative processes to prognostic labels, as provided by experts according to any method of processing and/or entering expert data as described above. As an additional example, an ameliorative supplement table 524 may list one or more ameliorative processes based on nutritional supplements, such as vitamin pills or the like, and/or links of such one or more ameliorative processes to prognostic labels, as provided by experts according to any method of processing and/or entering expert data as described above. As a further non-limiting example, an ameliorative medication table 528 may list one or more ameliorative processes based on medications, including without limitation over-the-counter and prescription pharmaceutical drugs, and/or links of such one or more ameliorative processes to prognostic labels, as provided by experts according to any method of processing and/or entering expert data as described above. As an additional example, a counterindication table 532 may list one or more counter-indications for one or more ameliorative processes; counterindications may include, without limitation allergies to one or more foods, medications, and/or supplements, side-effects of one or more medications and/or supplements, interactions between medications, foods, and/or supplements, exercises that should not be used given one or more medical conditions, injuries, disabilities, and/or demographic categories, or the like. Tables presented above are presented for exemplary purposes only; persons skilled in the art will be aware of various ways in which data may be organized in expert knowledge database 304 consistently with this disclosure.

Referring again to FIG. 3, a prognostic label database 312, which may be implemented in any manner suitable for implementation of biological extraction database 300, may be used to store prognostic labels used in diagnostic engine 108, including any prognostic labels correlated with elements of physiological data in first training set 200 as described above; prognostic labels may be linked to or refer to entries in biological extraction database 300 to which prognostic labels correspond. Linking may be performed by reference to historical data concerning biological extractions, such as diagnoses, prognoses, and/or other medical conclusions derived from biological extractions in the past; alternatively or additionally, a relationship between a prognostic label and a data entry in biological extraction database 300 may be determined by reference to a record in an expert knowledge database 304 linking a given prognostic label to a given category of biological extraction as described above. Entries in prognostic label database 312 may be associated with one or more categories of prognostic labels as described above, for instance using data stored in and/or extracted from an expert knowledge database 304.

Referring now to FIG. 6, an exemplary embodiment of a prognostic label database 312 is illustrated. Prognostic label database 312 may, as a non-limiting example, organize data stored in the prognostic label database 312 according to one or more database tables. One or more database tables may be linked to one another by, for instance, common column values. For instance, a common column between two tables of prognostic label database 312 may include an identifier of an expert submission, such as a form entry, textual submission, expert paper, or the like, for instance as defined below; as a result, a query may be able to retrieve all rows from any table pertaining to a given submission or set thereof. Other columns may include any other category usable for organization or subdivision of expert data, including types of expert data, names and/or identifiers of experts submitting the data, times of submission, or the like; persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which expert data from one or more tables may be linked and/or related to expert data in one or more other tables.

Still referring to FIG. 6, one or more database tables in prognostic label database 312 may include, as a non-limiting example, a sample data table 600. Sample data table 600 may be a table listing sample data, along with, for instance, one or more linking columns to link such data to other information stored in prognostic label database 312. In an embodiment, sample data 604 may be acquired, for instance from biological extraction database 300, in a raw or unsorted form, and may be translated into standard forms, such as standard units of measurement, labels associated with particular physiological data values, or the like; this may be accomplished using a data standardization module 608, which may perform unit conversions. Data standardization module 608 may alternatively or additionally map textual information, such as labels describing values tested for or the like, using language processing module 216 or equivalent components and/or algorithms thereto.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 6, prognostic label database 312 may include a sample label table 612; sample label table 612 may list prognostic labels received with and/or extracted from biological extractions, for instance as received in the form of sample text 616. A language processing module 216 may compare textual information so received to prognostic labels and/or form new prognostic labels according to any suitable process as described above. Sample prognostic link table 620 may combine samples with prognostic labels, as acquired from sample label table and/or expert knowledge database 304; combination may be performed by listing together in rows or by relating indices or common columns of two or more tables to each other. Tables presented above are presented for exemplary purposes only; persons skilled in the art will be aware of various ways in which data may be organized in expert knowledge database 304 consistently with this disclosure.

Referring again to FIG. 3, first training set 200 may be populated by retrieval of one or more records from biological extraction database 300 and/or prognostic label database 312; in an embodiment, entries retrieved from biological extraction database 300 and/or prognostic label database 312 may be filtered and or select via query to match one or more additional elements of information as described above, so as to retrieve a first training set 200 including data belonging to a given cohort, demographic population, or other set, so as to generate outputs as described below that are tailored to a person or persons with regard to whom diagnostic engine 108 classifies biological extractions to prognostic labels as set forth in further detail below. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which records may be retrieved from biological extraction database 300 and/or prognostic label database to generate a first training set to reflect individualized group data pertaining to a person of interest in operation of system and/or method, including without limitation a person with regard to whom at least a biological extraction is being evaluated as described in further detail below. Diagnostic engine 108 may alternatively or additionally receive a first training set 200 and store one or more entries in biological extraction database 300 and/or prognostic label database 312 as extracted from elements of first training set 200.

Still referring to FIG. 3, diagnostic engine 108 may include or communicate with an ameliorative process label database 316; an ameliorative process label database 316 may include any data structure and/or datastore suitable for use as a biological extraction database 300 as described above. An ameliorative process label database 316 may include one or more entries listing labels associated with one or more ameliorative processes as described above, including any ameliorative labels correlated with prognostic labels in second training set 220 as described above; ameliorative process labels may be linked to or refer to entries in prognostic label database 312 to which ameliorative process labels correspond. Linking may be performed by reference to historical data concerning prognostic labels, such as therapies, treatments, and/or lifestyle or dietary choices chosen to alleviate conditions associated with prognostic labels in the past; alternatively or additionally, a relationship between an ameliorative process label and a data entry in prognostic label database 312 may be determined by reference to a record in an expert knowledge database 304 linking a given ameliorative process label to a given category of prognostic label as described above. Entries in ameliorative process label database 312 may be associated with one or more categories of prognostic labels as described above, for instance using data stored in and/or extracted from an expert knowledge database 304.

Referring now to FIG. 7, an exemplary embodiment of an ameliorative process label database 316 is illustrated. Ameliorative process label database 316 may, as a non-limiting example, organize data stored in the ameliorative process label database 316 according to one or more database tables. One or more database tables may be linked to one another by, for instance, common column values. For instance, a common column between two tables of ameliorative process label database 316 may include an identifier of an expert submission, such as a form entry, textual submission, expert paper, or the like, for instance as defined below; as a result, a query may be able to retrieve all rows from any table pertaining to a given submission or set thereof. Other columns may include any other category usable for organization or subdivision of expert data, including types of expert data, names and/or identifiers of experts submitting the data, times of submission, or the like; persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which expert data from one or more tables may be linked and/or related to expert data in one or more other tables.

Still referring to FIG. 7, ameliorative process label database 316 may include a prognostic link table 700; prognostic link table may link ameliorative process data to prognostic label data, using any suitable method for linking data in two or more tables as described above. Ameliorative process label database 316 may include an ameliorative nutrition table 704, which may list one or more ameliorative processes based on nutritional instructions, and/or links of such one or more ameliorative processes to prognostic labels, for instance as provided by experts according to any method of processing and/or entering expert data as described above, and/or using one or more machine-learning processes as set forth in further detail below. As a further example an ameliorative action table 708 may list one or more ameliorative processes based on instructions for actions a user should take, including without limitation exercise, meditation, and/or cessation of harmful eating, substance abuse, or other habits, and/or links of such one or more ameliorative processes to prognostic labels, as provided by experts according to any method of processing and/or entering expert data as described above and/or using one or more machine-learning processes as set forth in further detail below. As an additional example, an ameliorative supplement table 712 may list one or more ameliorative processes based on nutritional supplements, such as vitamin pills or the like, and/or links of such one or more ameliorative processes to prognostic labels, as provided by experts according to any method of processing and/or entering expert data as described above and/or using one or more machine-learning processes as set forth in further detail below. As a further non-limiting example, an ameliorative medication table 716 may list one or more ameliorative processes based on medications, including without limitation over-the-counter and prescription pharmaceutical drugs, and/or links of such one or more ameliorative processes to prognostic labels, as provided by experts according to any method of processing and/or entering expert data as described above and/or using one or more machine-learning processes as set forth in further detail below. As an additional example, a counterindication table 720 may list one or more counter-indications for one or more ameliorative processes; counterindications may include, without limitation allergies to one or more foods, medications, and/or supplements, side-effects of one or more medications and/or supplements, interactions between medications, foods, and/or supplements, exercises that should not be used given one or more medical conditions, injuries, disabilities, and/or demographic categories, or the like; this may be acquired using expert submission as described above and/or using one or more machine-learning processes as set forth in further detail below. Tables presented above are presented for exemplary purposes only; persons skilled in the art will be aware of various ways in which data may be organized in ameliorative process database 316 consistently with this disclosure.

Referring again to FIG. 3, second training set 220 may be populated by retrieval of one or more records from prognostic label database 312 and/or ameliorative process label database 316; in an embodiment, entries retrieved from prognostic label database 312 and/or ameliorative process label database 316 may be filtered and or select via query to match one or more additional elements of information as described above, so as to retrieve a second training set 220 including data belonging to a given cohort, demographic population, or other set, so as to generate outputs as described below that are tailored to a person or persons with regard to whom diagnostic engine 108 classifies prognostic labels to ameliorative process labels as set forth in further detail below. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which records may be retrieved from prognostic label database 312 and/or ameliorative process label database 316 to generate a second training set 220 to reflect individualized group data pertaining to a person of interest in operation of system and/or method, including without limitation a person with regard to whom at least a biological extraction is being evaluated as described in further detail below. Diagnostic engine 108 may alternatively or additionally receive a second training set 220 and store one or more entries in prognostic label database 312 and/or ameliorative process label database 316 as extracted from elements of second training set 220.

In an embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 3, diagnostic engine 108 may receive an update to one or more elements of data represented in first training set 200 and/or second training set 220, and may perform one or more modifications to first training set 200 and/or second training set 220, or to biological extraction database 300, expert knowledge database 304, prognostic label database 312, and/or ameliorative process label database 316 as a result. For instance, a biological extraction may turn out to have been erroneously recorded; diagnostic engine 108 may remove it from first training set 200, second training set 220, biological extraction database 300, expert knowledge database 304, prognostic label database 312, and/or ameliorative process label database 316 as a result. As a further example, a medical and/or academic paper, or a study on which it was based, may be revoked; diagnostic engine 108 may remove it from first training set 200, second training set 220, biological extraction database 300, expert knowledge database 304, prognostic label database 312, and/or ameliorative process label database 316 as a result. Information provided by an expert may likewise be removed if the expert loses credentials or is revealed to have acted fraudulently.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 3, elements of data first training set 200, second training set 220, biological extraction database 300, expert knowledge database 304, prognostic label database 312, and/or ameliorative process label database 316 may have temporal attributes, such as timestamps; diagnostic engine 108 may order such elements according to recency, select only elements more recently entered for first training set 200 and/or second training set 220, or otherwise bias training sets, database entries, and/or machine-learning models as described in further detail below toward more recent or less recent entries. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which temporal attributes of data entries may be used to affect results of methods and/or systems as described herein.

Referring again to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 may be configured to record at least a biological extraction. At least a biological extraction may include a physically extracted sample, which as used herein includes a sample obtained by removing and analyzing tissue and/or fluid. Physically extracted sample may include without limitation a blood sample, a tissue sample, a buccal swab, a mucous sample, a stool sample, a hair sample, a fingernail sample, or the like. Physically extracted sample may include, as a non-limiting example, at least a blood sample. As a further non-limiting example, at least a biological extraction may include at least a genetic sample. At least a genetic sample may include a complete genome of a person or any portion thereof. At least a genetic sample may include a DNA sample and/or an RNA sample. At least a biological extraction may include an epigenetic sample, a proteomic sample, a tissue sample, a biopsy, and/or any other physically extracted sample. At least a biological extraction may include an endocrinal sample. As a further non-limiting example, the at least a biological extraction may include a signal from at least a sensor configured to detect physiological data of a user and recording the at least a biological extraction as a function of the signal. At least a sensor 232 may include any medical sensor and/or medical device configured to capture sensor data concerning a patient, including any scanning, radiological and/or imaging device such as without limitation x-ray equipment, computer assisted tomography (CAT) scan equipment, positron emission tomography (PET) scan equipment, any form of magnetic resonance imagery (MM) equipment, ultrasound equipment, optical scanning equipment such as photo-plethysmographic equipment, or the like. At least a sensor 232 may include any electromagnetic sensor, including without limitation electroencephalographic sensors, magnetoencephalographic sensors, electrocardiographic sensors, electromyographic sensors, or the like. At least a sensor 232 may include a weight scale. At least a sensor 232 may include a temperature sensor. At least a sensor 232 may include any sensor that may be included in a mobile device and/or wearable device, including without limitation a motion sensor such as an inertial measurement unit (IMU), one or more accelerometers, one or more gyroscopes, one or more magnetometers, or the like. At least a wearable and/or mobile device sensor may capture step, gait, and/or other mobility data, as well as data describing activity levels and/or physical fitness. At least a wearable and/or mobile device sensor may detect heart rate or the like. At least a sensor 232 may detect any hematological parameter including blood oxygen level, pulse rate, heart rate, pulse rhythm, blood glucose and/or blood pressure. At least a sensor 232 may be a part of diagnostic engine 108 or may be a separate device in communication with diagnostic engine 108.

Still referring to FIG. 2, at least a biological extraction may include any data suitable for use as physiological state data as described above, including without limitation any result of any medical test, physiological assessment, cognitive assessment, psychological assessment, or the like. System 100 may receive at least a biological extraction from one or more other devices after performance; system 100 may alternatively or additionally perform one or more assessments and/or tests to obtain at least a biological extraction, and/or one or more portions thereof, on system 100. For instance, at least biological extraction may include or more entries by a user in a form or similar graphical user interface object; one or more entries may include, without limitation, user responses to questions on a psychological, behavioral, personality, or cognitive test. For instance, at least a server 104 may present to user a set of assessment questions designed or intended to evaluate a current state of mind of the user, a current psychological state of the user, a personality trait of the user, or the like; at least a server 104 may provide user-entered responses to such questions directly as at least a biological extraction and/or may perform one or more calculations or other algorithms to derive a score or other result of an assessment as specified by one or more testing protocols, such as automated calculation of a Stanford-Binet and/or Wechsler scale for IQ testing, a personality test scoring such as a Myers-Briggs test protocol, or other assessments that may occur to persons skilled in the art upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure.

Alternatively or additionally, and with continued reference to FIG. 2, at least a biological extraction may include assessment and/or self-assessment data, and/or automated or other assessment results, obtained from a third-party device; third-party device may include, without limitation, a server or other device (not shown) that performs automated cognitive, psychological, behavioral, personality, or other assessments. Third-party device may include a device operated by an informed advisor.

Still referring to FIG. 2, at least a biological extraction may include data describing one or more test results, including results of mobility tests, stress tests, dexterity tests, endocrinal tests, genetic tests, and/or electromyographic tests, biopsies, radiological tests, genetic tests, and/or sensory tests. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various additional examples of at least a biological extraction consistent with this disclosure. At least a biological extraction may be added to biological extraction database 300.

With continued reference to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 may include a prognostic label learner 236 operating on the diagnostic engine 108, the prognostic label learner 236 designed and configured to generate the at least a prognostic output as a function of the first training set 200 and the at least a biological extraction. Prognostic label learner 236 may include any hardware and/or software module. Prognostic label learner 236 is designed and configured to generate outputs using machine learning processes. A machine learning process is a process that automatedly uses a body of data known as “training data” and/or a “training set” to generate an algorithm that will be performed by a computing device/module to produce outputs given data provided as inputs; this is in contrast to a non-machine learning software program where the commands to be executed are determined in advance by a user and written in a programming language.

Still referring to FIG. 2, prognostic label learner 236 may be designed and configured to generate at least a prognostic output by creating at least a first machine-learning model 240 relating physiological state data 204 to prognostic labels using the first training set 200 and generating the at least a prognostic output using the first machine-learning model 240; at least a first machine-learning model 240 may include one or more models that determine a mathematical relationship between physiological state data 204 and prognostic labels. Such models may include without limitation model developed using linear regression models. Linear regression models may include ordinary least squares regression, which aims to minimize the square of the difference between predicted outcomes and actual outcomes according to an appropriate norm for measuring such a difference (e.g. a vector-space distance norm); coefficients of the resulting linear equation may be modified to improve minimization. Linear regression models may include ridge regression methods, where the function to be minimized includes the least-squares function plus term multiplying the square of each coefficient by a scalar amount to penalize large coefficients. Linear regression models may include least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) models, in which ridge regression is combined with multiplying the least-squares term by a factor of 1 divided by double the number of samples. Linear regression models may include a multi-task lasso model wherein the norm applied in the least-squares term of the lasso model is the Frobenius norm amounting to the square root of the sum of squares of all terms. Linear regression models may include the elastic net model, a multi-task elastic net model, a least angle regression model, a LARS lasso model, an orthogonal matching pursuit model, a Bayesian regression model, a logistic regression model, a stochastic gradient descent model, a perceptron model, a passive aggressive algorithm, a robustness regression model, a Huber regression model, or any other suitable model that may occur to persons skilled in the art upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure. Linear regression models may be generalized in an embodiment to polynomial regression models, whereby a polynomial equation (e.g. a quadratic, cubic or higher-order equation) providing a best predicted output/actual output fit is sought; similar methods to those described above may be applied to minimize error functions, as will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 2, machine-learning algorithm used to generate first machine-learning model 240 may include, without limitation, linear discriminant analysis. Machine-learning algorithm may include quadratic discriminate analysis. Machine-learning algorithms may include kernel ridge regression. Machine-learning algorithms may include support vector machines, including without limitation support vector classification-based regression processes. Machine-learning algorithms may include stochastic gradient descent algorithms, including classification and regression algorithms based on stochastic gradient descent. Machine-learning algorithms may include nearest neighbors' algorithms. Machine-learning algorithms may include Gaussian processes such as Gaussian Process Regression. Machine-learning algorithms may include cross-decomposition algorithms, including partial least squares and/or canonical correlation analysis. Machine-learning algorithms may include naïve Bayes methods. Machine-learning algorithms may include algorithms based on decision trees, such as decision tree classification or regression algorithms. Machine-learning algorithms may include ensemble methods such as bagging meta-estimator, forest of randomized tress, AdaBoost, gradient tree boosting, and/or voting classifier methods. Machine-learning algorithms may include neural net algorithms, including convolutional neural net processes.

Still referring to FIG. 2, prognostic label learner 236 may generate prognostic output using alternatively or additional artificial intelligence methods, including without limitation by creating an artificial neural network, such as a convolutional neural network comprising an input layer of nodes, one or more intermediate layers, and an output layer of nodes. Connections between nodes may be created via the process of “training” the network, in which elements from a training dataset are applied to the input nodes, a suitable training algorithm (such as Levenberg-Marquardt, conjugate gradient, simulated annealing, or other algorithms) is then used to adjust the connections and weights between nodes in adjacent layers of the neural network to produce the desired values at the output nodes. This process is sometimes referred to as deep learning. This network may be trained using first training set 200; the trained network may then be used to apply detected relationships between elements of physiological state data 204 and prognostic labels.

Referring now to FIG. 8, machine-learning algorithms used by prognostic label learner 236 may include supervised machine-learning algorithms, which may, as a non-limiting example be executed using a supervised learning module 800 executing on diagnostic engine 108 and/or on another computing device in communication with diagnostic engine 108, which may include any hardware or software module. Supervised machine learning algorithms, as defined herein, include algorithms that receive a training set relating a number of inputs to a number of outputs, and seek to find one or more mathematical relations relating inputs to outputs, where each of the one or more mathematical relations is optimal according to some criterion specified to the algorithm using some scoring function. For instance, a supervised learning algorithm may use elements of physiological data as inputs, prognostic labels as outputs, and a scoring function representing a desired form of relationship to be detected between elements of physiological data and prognostic labels; scoring function may, for instance, seek to maximize the probability that a given element of physiological state data 204 and/or combination of elements of physiological data is associated with a given prognostic label and/or combination of prognostic labels to minimize the probability that a given element of physiological state data 204 and/or combination of elements of physiological state data 204 is not associated with a given prognostic label and/or combination of prognostic labels. Scoring function may be expressed as a risk function representing an “expected loss” of an algorithm relating inputs to outputs, where loss is computed as an error function representing a degree to which a prediction generated by the relation is incorrect when compared to a given input-output pair provided in first training set 200. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various possible variations of supervised machine learning algorithms that may be used to determine relation between elements of physiological data and prognostic labels. In an embodiment, one or more supervised machine-learning algorithms may be restricted to a particular domain for instance, a supervised machine-learning process may be performed with respect to a given set of parameters and/or categories of parameters that have been suspected to be related to a given set of prognostic labels, and/or are specified as linked to a medical specialty and/or field of medicine covering a particular set of prognostic labels. As a non-limiting example, a particular set of blood test biomarkers and/or sensor data may be typically used by cardiologists to diagnose or predict various cardiovascular conditions, and a supervised machine-learning process may be performed to relate those blood test biomarkers and/or sensor data to the various cardiovascular conditions; in an embodiment, domain restrictions of supervised machine-learning procedures may improve accuracy of resulting models by ignoring artifacts in training data. Domain restrictions may be suggested by experts and/or deduced from known purposes for particular evaluations and/or known tests used to evaluate prognostic labels. Additional supervised learning processes may be performed without domain restrictions to detect, for instance, previously unknown and/or unsuspected relationships between physiological data and prognostic labels.

Referring again to FIG. 2, machine-learning algorithms may include unsupervised processes; unsupervised processes may, as a non-limiting example, be executed by an unsupervised learning module 804 executing on diagnostic engine 108 and/or on another computing device in communication with diagnostic engine 108, which may include any hardware or software module. An unsupervised machine-learning process, as used herein, is a process that derives inferences in datasets without regard to labels; as a result, an unsupervised machine-learning process may be free to discover any structure, relationship, and/or correlation provided in the data. For instance, and without limitation, prognostic label learner 236 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may perform an unsupervised machine learning process on first training set 200, which may cluster data of first training set 200 according to detected relationships between elements of the first training set 200, including without limitation correlations of elements of physiological state data 204 to each other and correlations of prognostic labels to each other; such relations may then be combined with supervised machine learning results to add new criteria for prognostic label learner 236 to apply in relating physiological state data 204 to prognostic labels. As a non-limiting, illustrative example, an unsupervised process may determine that a first element of physiological data acquired in a blood test correlates closely with a second element of physiological data, where the first element has been linked via supervised learning processes to a given prognostic label, but the second has not; for instance, the second element may not have been defined as an input for the supervised learning process, or may pertain to a domain outside of a domain limitation for the supervised learning process. Continuing the example a close correlation between first element of physiological state data 204 and second element of physiological state data 204 may indicate that the second element is also a good predictor for the prognostic label; second element may be included in a new supervised process to derive a relationship or may be used as a synonym or proxy for the first physiological element by prognostic label learner 236.

Still referring to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 and/or prognostic label learner 236 may detect further significant categories of physiological data, relationships of such categories to prognostic labels, and/or categories of prognostic labels using machine-learning processes, including without limitation unsupervised machine-learning processes as described above; such newly identified categories, as well as categories entered by experts in free-form fields as described above, may be added to pre-populated lists of categories, lists used to identify language elements for language learning module, and/or lists used to identify and/or score categories detected in documents, as described above. In an embodiment, as additional data is added to diagnostic engine 108, prognostic label learner 236 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may continuously or iteratively perform unsupervised machine-learning processes to detect relationships between different elements of the added and/or overall data; in an embodiment, this may enable diagnostic engine 108 to use detected relationships to discover new correlations between known biomarkers, prognostic labels, and/or ameliorative labels and one or more elements of data in large bodies of data, such as genomic, proteomic, and/or microbiome-related data, enabling future supervised learning and/or lazy learning processes as described in further detail below to identify relationships between, e.g., particular clusters of genetic alleles and particular prognostic labels and/or suitable ameliorative labels. Use of unsupervised learning may greatly enhance the accuracy and detail with which system may detect prognostic labels and/or ameliorative labels.

With continued reference to FIG. 2, unsupervised processes may be subjected to domain limitations. For instance, and without limitation, an unsupervised process may be performed regarding a comprehensive set of data regarding one person, such as a comprehensive medical history, set of test results, and/or physiological data such as genomic, proteomic, and/or other data concerning that persons. As another non-limiting example, an unsupervised process may be performed on data concerning a particular cohort of persons; cohort may include, without limitation, a demographic group such as a group of people having a shared age range, ethnic background, nationality, sex, and/or gender. Cohort may include, without limitation, a group of people having a shared value for an element and/or category of physiological data, a group of people having a shared value for an element and/or category of prognostic label, and/or a group of people having a shared value and/or category of ameliorative label; as illustrative examples, cohort could include all people having a certain level or range of levels of blood triglycerides, all people diagnosed with type II diabetes, all people who regularly run between 10 and 15 miles per week, or the like. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of a multiplicity of ways in which cohorts and/or other sets of data may be defined and/or limited for a particular unsupervised learning process.

Still referring to FIG. 2, prognostic label learner 236 may alternatively or additionally be designed and configured to generate at least a prognostic output by executing a lazy learning process as a function of the first training set 200 and the at least a biological extraction; lazy learning processes may be performed by a lazy learning module 808 executing on diagnostic engine 108 and/or on another computing device in communication with diagnostic engine 108, which may include any hardware or software module. A lazy-learning process and/or protocol, which may alternatively be referred to as a “lazy loading” or “call-when-needed” process and/or protocol, may be a process whereby machine learning is conducted upon receipt of an input to be converted to an output, by combining the input and training set to derive the algorithm to be used to produce the output on demand. For instance, an initial set of simulations may be performed to cover a “first guess” at a prognostic label associated with biological extraction, using first training set 200. As a non-limiting example, an initial heuristic may include a ranking of prognostic labels according to relation to a test type of at least a biological extraction, one or more categories of physiological data identified in test type of at least a biological extraction, and/or one or more values detected in at least a biological extraction; ranking may include, without limitation, ranking according to significance scores of associations between elements of physiological data and prognostic labels, for instance as calculated as described above. Heuristic may include selecting some number of highest-ranking associations and/or prognostic labels. Prognostic label learner 236 may alternatively or additionally implement any suitable “lazy learning” algorithm, including without limitation a K-nearest neighbors algorithm, a lazy naïve Bayes algorithm, or the like; persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various lazy-learning algorithms that may be applied to generate prognostic outputs as described in this disclosure, including without limitation lazy learning applications of machine-learning algorithms as described in further detail below.

In an embodiment, and continuing to refer to FIG. 2, prognostic label learner 236 may generate a plurality of prognostic labels having different implications for a particular person. For instance, where the at least a biological extraction includes a result of a dexterity test, a low score may be consistent with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, and/or any number of less sever disorders or tendencies associated with lower levels of dexterity. In such a situation, prognostic label learner 236 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may perform additional processes to resolve ambiguity. Processes may include presenting multiple possible results to a medical practitioner, informing the medical practitioner that one or more follow-up tests and/or biological extractions are needed to further determine a more definite prognostic label. Alternatively or additionally, processes may include additional machine learning steps; for instance, where reference to a model generated using supervised learning on a limited domain has produced multiple mutually exclusive results and/or multiple results that are unlikely all to be correct, or multiple different supervised machine learning models in different domains may have identified mutually exclusive results and/or multiple results that are unlikely all to be correct. In such a situation, prognostic label learner 236 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may operate a further algorithm to determine which of the multiple outputs is most likely to be correct; algorithm may include use of an additional supervised and/or unsupervised model. Alternatively or additionally, prognostic label learner 236 may perform one or more lazy learning processes using a more comprehensive set of user data to identify a more probably correct result of the multiple results. Results may be presented and/or retained with rankings, for instance to advise a medical professional of the relative probabilities of various prognostic labels being correct; alternatively or additionally, prognostic labels associated with a probability of correctness below a given threshold and/or prognostic labels contradicting results of the additional process, may be eliminated. As a non-limiting example, an endocrinal test may determine that a given person has high levels of dopamine, indicating that a poor pegboard performance is almost certainly not being caused by Parkinson's disease, which may lead to Parkinson's being eliminated from a list of prognostic labels associated with poor pegboard performance, for that person. Similarly, a genetic test may eliminate Huntington's disease, or another disease definitively linked to a given genetic profile, as a cause. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which additional processing may be used to determine relative likelihoods of prognostic labels on a list of multiple prognostic labels, and/or to eliminate some labels from such a list. Prognostic output 812 may be provided to user output device as described in further detail below.

Still referring to FIG. 2, diagnostic engine 108 includes an ameliorative process label learner 244 operating on the diagnostic engine 108, the ameliorative process label learner 244 designed and configured to generate the at least an ameliorative output as a function of the second training set 220 and the at least a prognostic output. Ameliorative process label learner 244 may include any hardware or software module suitable for use as a prognostic label learner 236 as described above. Ameliorative process label learner 244 is a machine-learning module as described above; ameliorative process label learner 244 may perform any machine-learning process or combination of processes suitable for use by a prognostic label learner 236 as described above. For instance, and without limitation, and ameliorative process label learner 244 may be configured to create a second machine-learning model 248 relating prognostic labels to ameliorative labels using the second training set 220 and generate the at least an ameliorative output using the second machine-learning model 248; second machine-learning model 248 may be generated according to any process, process steps, or combination of processes and/or process steps suitable for creation of first machine learning model. In an embodiment, ameliorative process label learner 244 may use data from first training set 200 as well as data from second training set 220; for instance, ameliorative process label learner 244 may use lazy learning and/or model generation to determine relationships between elements of physiological data, in combination with or instead of prognostic labels, and ameliorative labels. Where ameliorative process label learner 244 determines relationships between elements of physiological data and ameliorative labels directly, this may determine relationships between prognostic labels and ameliorative labels as well owing to the existence of relationships determined by prognostic label learner 236.

Referring now to FIG. 9, ameliorative process label learner 244 may be configured to perform one or more supervised learning processes, as described above; supervised learning processes may be performed by a supervised learning module 900 executing on diagnostic engine 108 and/or on another computing device in communication with diagnostic engine 108, which may include any hardware or software module. For instance, a supervised learning algorithm may use prognostic labels as inputs, ameliorative labels as outputs, and a scoring function representing a desired form of relationship to be detected between prognostic labels and ameliorative labels; scoring function may, for instance, seek to maximize the probability that a given prognostic label and/or combination of prognostic labels is associated with a given ameliorative label and/or combination of ameliorative labels to minimize the probability that a given prognostic label and/or combination of prognostic labels is not associated with a given ameliorative label and/or combination of ameliorative labels. In an embodiment, one or more supervised machine-learning algorithms may be restricted to a particular domain; for instance, a supervised machine-learning process may be performed with respect to a given set of parameters and/or categories of prognostic labels that have been suspected to be related to a given set of ameliorative labels, for instance because the ameliorative processes corresponding to the set of ameliorative labels are hypothesized or suspected to have an ameliorative effect on conditions represented by the prognostic labels, and/or are specified as linked to a medical specialty and/or field of medicine covering a particular set of prognostic labels and/or ameliorative labels. As a non-limiting example, a particular set prognostic labels corresponding to a set of cardiovascular conditions may be typically treated by cardiologists, and a supervised machine-learning process may be performed to relate those prognostic labels to ameliorative labels associated with various treatment options, medications, and/or lifestyle changes.

With continued reference to FIG. 9, ameliorative process label learner 244 may perform one or more unsupervised machine-learning processes as described above; unsupervised processes may be performed by an unsupervised learning module 904 executing on diagnostic engine 108 and/or on another computing device in communication with diagnostic engine 108, which may include any hardware or software module. For instance, and without limitation, ameliorative process label learner 244 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may perform an unsupervised machine learning process on second training set 220, which may cluster data of second training set 220 according to detected relationships between elements of the second training set 220, including without limitation correlations of prognostic labels to each other and correlations of ameliorative labels to each other; such relations may then be combined with supervised machine learning results to add new criteria for ameliorative process label learner 244 to apply in relating prognostic labels to ameliorative labels. As a non-limiting, illustrative example, an unsupervised process may determine that a first prognostic label 208 correlates closely with a second prognostic label 224, where the first prognostic label 208 has been linked via supervised learning processes to a given ameliorative label, but the second has not; for instance, the second prognostic label 224 may not have been defined as an input for the supervised learning process, or may pertain to a domain outside of a domain limitation for the supervised learning process. Continuing the example, a close correlation between first prognostic label 208 and second prognostic label 224 may indicate that the second prognostic label 224 is also a good match for the ameliorative label; second prognostic label 224 may be included in a new supervised process to derive a relationship or may be used as a synonym or proxy for the first prognostic label 208 by ameliorative process label learner 244. Unsupervised processes performed by ameliorative process label learner 244 may be subjected to any domain limitations suitable for unsupervised processes performed by prognostic label learner 236 as described above.

Still referring to FIG. 9, diagnostic engine 108 and/or ameliorative process label learner 244 may detect further significant categories of prognostic labels, relationships of such categories to ameliorative labels, and/or categories of ameliorative labels using machine-learning processes, including without limitation unsupervised machine-learning processes as described above; such newly identified categories, as well as categories entered by experts in free-form fields as described above, may be added to pre-populated lists of categories, lists used to identify language elements for language learning module, and/or lists used to identify and/or score categories detected in documents, as described above. In an embodiment, as additional data is added to diagnostic engine 108, ameliorative process label learner 244 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may continuously or iteratively perform unsupervised machine-learning processes to detect relationships between different elements of the added and/or overall data; in an embodiment, this may enable diagnostic engine 108 to use detected relationships to discover new correlations between known biomarkers, prognostic labels, and/or ameliorative labels and one or more elements of data in large bodies of data, such as genomic, proteomic, and/or microbiome-related data, enabling future supervised learning and/or lazy learning processes to identify relationships between, e.g., particular clusters of genetic alleles and particular prognostic labels and/or suitable ameliorative labels. Use of unsupervised learning may greatly enhance the accuracy and detail with which system may detect prognostic labels and/or ameliorative labels.

Continuing to view FIG. 9, ameliorative process label learner 244 may be configured to perform a lazy learning process as a function of the second training set 220 and the at least a prognostic output to produce the at least an ameliorative output; a lazy learning process may include any lazy learning process as described above regarding prognostic label learner 236. Lazy learning processes may be performed by a lazy learning module 908 executing on diagnostic engine 108 and/or on another computing device in communication with diagnostic engine 108, which may include any hardware or software module. Ameliorative output 912 may be provided to a user output device as described in further detail below.

In an embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 9, ameliorative process label learner 244 may generate a plurality of ameliorative labels having different implications for a particular person. For instance, where a prognostic label indicates that a person has a magnesium deficiency, various dietary choices may be generated as ameliorative labels associated with correcting the deficiency, such as ameliorative labels associated with consumption of almonds, spinach, and/or dark chocolate, as well as ameliorative labels associated with consumption of magnesium supplements. In such a situation, ameliorative process label learner 244 and/or diagnostic engine 108 may perform additional processes to resolve ambiguity. Processes may include presenting multiple possible results to a medical practitioner, informing the medical practitioner of various options that may be available, and/or that follow-up tests, procedures, or counseling may be required to select an appropriate choice. Alternatively or additionally, processes may include additional machine learning steps. For instance, ameliorative process label learner 244 may perform one or more lazy learning processes using a more comprehensive set of user data to identify a more probably correct result of the multiple results. Results may be presented and/or retained with rankings, for instance to advise a medical professional of the relative probabilities of various ameliorative labels being correct or ideal choices for a given person; alternatively or additionally, ameliorative labels associated with a probability of success or suitability below a given threshold and/or ameliorative labels contradicting results of the additional process, may be eliminated. As a non-limiting example, an additional process may reveal that a person is allergic to tree nuts, and consumption of almonds may be eliminated as an ameliorative label to be presented.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 9, ameliorative process label learner 244 may be designed and configured to generate further training data and/or to generate outputs using longitudinal data 916. As used herein, longitudinal data 916 may include a temporally ordered series of data concerning the same person, or the same cohort of persons; for instance, longitudinal data 916 may describe a series of blood samples taken one day or one month apart over the course of a year. Longitudinal data 916 may related to a series of samples tracking response of one or more elements of physiological data recorded regarding a person undergoing one or more ameliorative processes linked to one or more ameliorative process labels. Ameliorative process label learner 244 may track one or more elements of physiological data and fit, for instance, a linear, polynomial, and/or splined function to data points; linear, polynomial, or other regression across larger sets of longitudinal data, using, for instance, any regression process as described above, may be used to determine a best-fit graph or function for the effect of a given ameliorative process over time on a physiological parameter. Functions may be compared to each other to rank ameliorative processes; for instance, an ameliorative process associated with a steeper slope in curve representing improvement in a physiological data element, and/or a shallower slope in a curve representing a slower decline, may be ranked higher than an ameliorative process associated with a less steep slope for an improvement curve or a steeper slope for a curve marking a decline. Ameliorative processes associated with a curve and/or terminal data point representing a value that does not associate with a previously detected prognostic label may be ranked higher than one that is not so associated. Information obtained by analysis of longitudinal data 916 may be added to ameliorative process database and/or second training set.

Embodiments of diagnostic engine 108 may furnish augmented intelligence systems that facilitate diagnostic, prognostic, curative, and/or therapeutic decisions by medical professionals such as doctors. Diagnostic engine 108 may provide fully automated tools and resources for each doctor to handle, process, diagnosis, develop treatment plans, facilitate and monitor all patient implementation, and record each patient status. Provision of expert system elements via expert inputs and document-driven language analysis may ensure that recommendations generated by diagnostic engine 108 are backed by the very best medical knowledge and practices in the world. Models and/or learners with access to data in depth may enable generation of recommendations that are directly personalized for each patient, providing complete confidence, mitigated risk, and complete transparency. Access to well-organized and personalized knowledge in depth may greatly enhance efficiency of medical visits; in embodiments, a comprehensive visit may be completed in as little as 10 minutes. Recommendations may further suggest follow up testing and/or therapy, ensuring an effective ongoing treatment and prognostic plan.

Referring again to FIG. 1, artificial intelligence advisory system 100 may include a plan-generation module operating on the at least a server 104. Plan-generation module may include any suitable hardware or hardware module. In an embodiment, plan-generation module is designed and configured to generate a comprehensive instruction set 116 associated with the user based on the diagnostic output. In an embodiment, comprehensive instruction set 116 is a data structure containing instructions to be provided to the user to explain the user's current prognostic status, as reflected by one or more prognostic outputs and provide the user with a plan based on the at least an ameliorative output, to achieve that. Comprehensive instruction set 116 may include but is not limited to a program, strategy, summary, recommendation, or any other type of interactive platform that may be configured to comprise information associated with the user, an applicable verified external source, and one or more outputs derived from the analyses performed on the extraction from the user. Comprehensive instruction set 116 may describe to a user a future prognostic status to aspire to.

With continued reference to FIG. 1, diagnostic engine 108 generates at least a request for a user behavior modification as a function of the at least an ameliorative process label. User behavior modification, as used herein includes any modification a user desires to alter in response to a particular situation or stimulus. Behavior modification may include physical addictions to substances such as alcohol, tobacco, opioids, prescription drugs, cocaine, cannabis, amphetamines, hallucinogens, inhalants, phencyclidine and the like. Behavior modification may include impulse control disorders such as intermittent explosive disorder, kleptomania, pyromania, gambling and the like. Behavior modification may include addictions to certain actions such as food, sex, pornography, computer use, device use such as cellphones, tablets, and the like; work, exercise, spiritual obsession, pain seeking, cutting, shopping and the like. Behavior modification may include modification to a trait one may exhibit in personal relationships at home, work, or school such as winning too much, passing judgment, making destructive comments, speaking when angry, extreme negativity, withholding information, making excuses, clinging to the past, playing favorites, failing to listen, failing to express gratitude, and the like. Behavior modification may include modification to thoughts, words, actions and deeds such as sexual immorality including impurity, orgies, and lust, idolatry including witchcraft, selfish ambition, demons, and demigods, debauchery including drunkenness, filthy language, and corruption, hatred including malice, deceit, and fits of rage, jealousy including envy, anger, greed and slander. Behavior modification may include modification to a trait a user may exhibit surrounding one's lifestyle such as a desire to lose weight, attend training sessions at a gym more frequently, develop a meditation practice, meet with a nutrition professional to discuss meal plans and the like. Behavior modification may include modification to a trait a user seeks to attain. For example, behavior modification may include a desire to be driven by thoughts, words, actions and deeds surrounding traits such as love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control.

With continued reference to FIG. 1, diagnostic engine 108 may generate a behavior modification by linking the at least an ameliorative process label through a machine-learning process to a behavior modification as described in more detail below. For example, an ameliorative process label which includes a prescription for SUBOXONE as produced by Reckitt Benckiser of Slough, United Kingdom may be linked to a behavior modification which may include opioid addiction. In yet another non-limiting example, an ameliorative process label such as weight loss may be linked to a behavior modification which may include binge eating disorder. Diagnostic engine 108 may generate at least a request for a behavior modification by matching at least an ameliorative process label to at least a request for a behavior modification.

With continued reference to FIG. 1, diagnostic engine 108 generates at least a request for a behavior modification as a function of a user requested category of behavioral change. Category of behavioral change may include a grouping of behavioral modifications having particular shared characteristics. Categories may include groupings of behavioral modifications to certain stimuli. Categories may include sub-categories that further breakdown behavioral modification categories. For example, behavioral change may include categories such as addiction to substances, personal traits and/or characteristics, addiction to activities, health related behavioral changes, and the like. In yet another non-limiting example, a behavior change category such as addiction to substances may include sub-categories such as alcohol, cocaine, heroin, benzodiazepines, amphetamines, opioids, and the like. In an embodiment, diagnostic engine 108 may generate the at least a request for a behavior modification as a function of an ameliorative process label and at least a user requested category of behavior change. For example, an ameliorative process label such as a prescription for an antidepressant may be utilized in combination with a user requested category of behavior change such as experiencing more happiness to generate at least a request for a behavior modification.

With continued reference to FIG. 1, diagnostic engine 108 may be configured to have a feedback mechanism. In an embodiment, diagnostic engine 108 may be configured to receive a first training set 200 and/or a second training set 220 generated by system 100. For example, data about a user that has been previously been analyzed by diagnostic engine 108 may be utilized in algorithms by first model 240 and/or second model 248. Such algorithms may be continuously updated as a function of such data. In yet another embodiment, data analyzed by language processing module 216 may be utilized as part of training data generating algorithms by first model 240 and/or second model 248 and/or any other machine learning process performed by diagnostic engine 108.

With continued reference to FIG. 1, diagnostic engine 108 may be configured, for instance as part of receiving second training set 132, to receiving at least a second data entry of the plurality of second data entries from at least an expert. This may be performed, without limitation using second graphical user interface as described above.

Referring now to FIG. 10, an exemplary embodiment of a plan generation module 112 is illustrated. Comprehensive instruction set 116 includes at least a current prognostic descriptor 1000 which as used in this disclosure is an element of data describing a current prognostic status based on at least one prognostic output. Plan generation module 112 may produce at least a current prognostic descriptor 1000 using at least a prognostic output. In an embodiment, plan generation module 112 may include a label synthesizer 1004. Label synthesizer 1004 may include any suitable software or hardware module. In an embodiment, label synthesizer 1004 may be designed and configured to combine a plurality of labels in at least a prognostic output together to provide maximally efficient data presentation. Combination of labels together may include elimination of duplicate information. For instance, label synthesizer 1004 and/or at least a server 104 may be designed and configure to determine a first prognostic label of the at least a prognostic label is a duplicate of a second prognostic label of the at least a prognostic label and eliminate the first prognostic label. Determination that a first prognostic label is a duplicate of a second prognostic label may include determining that the first prognostic label is identical to the second prognostic label; for instance, a prognostic label generated from test data presented in one biological extraction of at least a biological extraction may be the same as a prognostic label generated from test data presented in a second biological extraction of at least a biological extraction. As a further non-limiting example, a first prognostic label may be synonymous with a second prognostic label, where detection of synonymous labels may be performed, without limitation, by a language processing module 216 as described above.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 10, label synthesizer 1004 may group prognostic labels according to one or more classification systems relating the prognostic labels to each other. For instance, plan generation module 112 and/or label synthesizer 1004 may be configured to determine that a first prognostic label of the at least a prognostic label and a second prognostic label of the at least a prognostic label belong to a shared category. A shared category may be a category of conditions or tendencies toward a future condition to which each of first prognostic label and second prognostic label belongs; as an example, lactose intolerance and gluten sensitivity may each be examples of digestive sensitivity, for instance, which may in turn share a category with food sensitivities, food allergies, digestive disorders such as celiac disease and diverticulitis, or the like. Shared category and/or categories may be associated with prognostic labels as well. A given prognostic label may belong to a plurality of overlapping categories. Plan generation module 112 may be configured to add a category label associated with a shared category to comprehensive instruction set 116, where addition of the label may include addition of the label and/or a datum linked to the label, such as a textual or narrative description. In an embodiment, relationships between prognostic labels and categories may be retrieved from a prognostic label classification database 1008, for instance by generating a query using one or more prognostic labels of at least a prognostic output, entering the query, and receiving one or more categories matching the query from the prognostic label classification database 1008.

Referring now to FIG. 11, an exemplary embodiment of a prognostic label classification database 1008 is illustrated. Prognostic label classification database 1008 may be implemented as any database and/or datastore suitable for use as biological extraction database 300 as described above. One or more database tables in prognostic label classification database 1008 may include, without limitation, a symptomatic classification table 1100; symptomatic classification table 1100 may relate each prognostic label to one or more categories of symptoms associated with that prognostic label. As a non-limiting example, symptomatic classification table 1100 may include records indicating that each of lactose intolerance and gluten sensitivity results in symptoms including gas buildup, bloating, and abdominal pain. One or more database tables in prognostic label classification database 1008 may include, without limitation, a systemic classification table 1104; systemic classification table 1104 may relate each prognostic label to one or more systems associated with that prognostic label. As a non-limiting example, systemic classification table 1104 may include records indicating each of lactose intolerance and gluten sensitivity affects the digestive system; two digestive sensitivities linked to allergic or other immune responses may additionally be linked in systemic classification table 1104 to the immune system. One or more database tables in prognostic label classification database 1008 may include, without limitation, a body part classification table 1108; body part classification table 1108 may relate each prognostic label to one or more body parts associated with that prognostic label. As a non-limiting example, body part classification table 1108 may include records indicating each of psoriasis and rosacea affects the skin of a person. One or more database tables in prognostic label classification database 1008 may include, without limitation, a causal classification table 1112; causal classification table 1112 may relate each prognostic label to one or more causes associated with that prognostic label. As a non-limiting example, causal classification table 1112 may include records indicating each of type 2 diabetes and hypertension may have obesity as a cause. The above-described tables, and entries therein, are provided solely for exemplary purposes. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various additional examples for tables and/or relationships that may be included or recorded in prognostic classification table consistently with this disclosure.

Referring again to FIG. 10, plan generation module 112 may be configured to generate current prognostic descriptor 1000 by converting one or more prognostic labels into narrative language. As a non-limiting example, plan generation module 112 may include a narrative language unit 1012, which may be configured to determine an element of narrative language associated with at least a prognostic label and include the element of narrative language in current prognostic label descriptor. Narrative language unit 1012 may implement this, without limitation, by using a language processing unit 216 to detect one or more associations between prognostic labels, or lists of prognostic labels, and phrases and/or statements of narrative language. Alternatively or additionally, narrative language unit 1012 may retrieve one or more elements of narrative language from a narrative language database 1016, which may contain one or more tables associating prognostic labels and/or groups of prognostic labels with words, sentences, and/or phrases of narrative language. One or more elements of narrative language may be included in comprehensive instruction set 116, for instance for display to a user as text describing a current prognostic status of the user. Current prognostic descriptor 1000 may further include one or more images; one or more images may be retrieved by plan generation module 112 from an image database 1020, which may contain one or more tables associating prognostic labels, groups of prognostic labels, current prognostic descriptors 1000, or the like with one or more images.

With continued reference to FIG. 10, comprehensive instruction set 116 may include one or more follow-up suggestions, which may include, without limitation, suggestions for acquisition of an additional biological extraction; in an embodiment, additional biological extraction may be provided to diagnostic engine 108, which may trigger repetition of one or more processes as described above, including without limitation generation of prognostic output, refinement or elimination of ambiguous prognostic labels of prognostic output, generation of ameliorative output, and/or refinement or elimination of ambiguous ameliorative labels of ameliorative output. For instance, where a pegboard test result suggests possible diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, ALS, and MS as described above, follow-up suggestions may include suggestions to perform endocrinal tests, genetic tests, and/or electromyographic tests; results of such tests may eliminate one or more of the possible diagnoses, such that a subsequently displayed output only lists conditions that have not been eliminated by the follow-up test. Follow-up tests may include any receipt of any biological extraction as described above.

With continued reference to FIG. 10, comprehensive instruction set may include one or more elements of contextual information, including without limitation any patient medical history such as current lab results, a current reason for visiting a medical professional, current status of one or more currently implemented treatment plans, biographical information concerning the patient, and the like. One or more elements of contextual information may include goals a patient wishes to achieve with a medical visit or session, and/or as result of interaction with diagnostic engine 108. Contextual information may include one or more questions a patient wishes to have answered in a medical visit and/or session, and/or as a result of interaction with diagnostic engine 108. Contextual information may include one or more questions to ask a patient. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various forms of contextual information that may be included, consistently with this disclosure.

With continued reference to FIG. 10, comprehensive instruction set 116 may include at least a future prognostic descriptor 1024. As used herein, a future prognostic descriptor 1024 is an element of data describing a future prognostic status based on at least one prognostic output, which may include without limitation a desired further prognostic status. In an embodiment, future prognostic descriptor 1024 may include any element suitable for inclusion in current prognostic descriptor 1000. Future prognostic descriptor 1024 may be generated using any processes, modules, and/or components suitable for generation of current prognostic descriptor 1000 as described above.

Still referring to FIG. 10, comprehensive instruction set 116 includes at least an ameliorative process descriptor 1028, which as defined in this disclosure an element of data describing one or more ameliorative processes to be followed based on at least one ameliorative output; at least an ameliorative process descriptor 1028 may include descriptors for ameliorative processes usable to achieve future prognostic descriptor 1024. Plan generation module 112 may produce at least an ameliorative process descriptor 1028 using at least a prognostic output. In an embodiment, label synthesizer 1004 may be designed and configured to combine a plurality of labels in at least an ameliorative output together to provide maximally efficient data presentation. Combination of labels together may include elimination of duplicate information. For instance, label synthesizer 1004 and/or at least a server 104 may be designed and configure to determine a first ameliorative label of the at least an ameliorative label is a duplicate of a second ameliorative label of the at least an ameliorative label and eliminate the first ameliorative label. Determination that a first ameliorative label is a duplicate of a second ameliorative label may include determining that the first ameliorative label is identical to the second ameliorative label; for instance, a ameliorative label generated from test data presented in one biological extraction of at least a biological extraction may be the same as a ameliorative label generated from test data presented in a second biological extraction of at least a biological extraction. As a further non-limiting example, a first ameliorative label may be synonymous with a second ameliorative label, where detection of synonymous labels may be performed, without limitation, by a language processing module 216 as described above.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 10, label synthesizer 1004 may group ameliorative labels according to one or more classification systems relating the ameliorative labels to each other. For instance, plan generation module 112 and/or label synthesizer 1004 may be configured to determine that a first ameliorative label of the at least an ameliorative label and a second ameliorative label of the at least an ameliorative label belong to a shared category. A shared category may be a category of conditions or tendencies toward a future condition to which each of first ameliorative label and second ameliorative label belongs; as an example, lactose intolerance and gluten sensitivity may each be examples of digestive sensitivity, for instance, which may in turn share a category with food sensitivities, food allergies, digestive disorders such as celiac disease and diverticulitis, or the like. Shared category and/or categories may be associated with ameliorative labels as well. A given ameliorative label may belong to a plurality of overlapping categories. Plan generation module 112 may be configured to add a category label associated with a shared category to comprehensive instruction set 116, where addition of the label may include addition of the label and/or a datum linked to the label, such as a textual or narrative description. In an embodiment, relationships between ameliorative labels and categories may be retrieved from an ameliorative label classification database 1032, for instance by generating a query using one or more ameliorative labels of at least an ameliorative output, entering the query, and receiving one or more categories matching the query from the ameliorative label classification database 1032.

Referring now to FIG. 12, an exemplary embodiment of an ameliorative label classification database 1032 is illustrated. Ameliorative label classification database 1032 may be implemented as any database and/or datastore suitable for use as biological extraction database 300 as described above. One or more database tables in ameliorative label classification database 1032 may include, without limitation, an intervention category table 1200; intervention 1200 may relate each ameliorative label to one or more categories associated with that ameliorative label. As a non-limiting example, intervention category table 1200 may include records indicating that each of a plan to consume a given quantity of almonds and a plan to consume less meat maps to a category of nutritional instruction, while a plan to jog for 30 minutes per day maps to a category of activity. One or more database tables in ameliorative label classification database 1032 may include, without limitation, a nutrition category table 1204; nutrition category table 1204 may relate each ameliorative label pertaining to nutrition to one or more categories associated with that ameliorative label. As a non-limiting example, nutrition category table 1204 may include records indicating that each of a plan to consume more almonds and a plan to consume more walnuts qualifies as a plan to consume more nuts, as well as a plan to consume more protein. One or more database tables in ameliorative label classification database 1032 may include, without limitation, an action category table 1208; action category table 1208 may relate each ameliorative label pertaining to an action to one or more categories associated with that ameliorative label. As a non-limiting example, action category table 1208 may include records indicating that each of a plan jog for 30 minutes a day and a plan to perform a certain number of sit-ups per day qualifies as an exercise plan. One or more database tables in ameliorative label classification database 1032 may include, without limitation, a medication category table 1212; medication category table 1212 may relate each ameliorative label associated with a medication to one or more categories associated with that ameliorative label. As a non-limiting example, medication category table 1212 may include records indicating that each of a plan to take an antihistamine and a plan to take an anti-inflammatory steroid belongs to a category of allergy medications. One or more database tables in ameliorative label classification database 1032 may include, without limitation, a supplement category table 1216; supplement category table 1216 may relate each ameliorative label pertaining to a supplement to one or more categories associated with that ameliorative label. As a non-limiting example, supplement category table 1216 may include records indicating that each of a plan to consume a calcium supplement and a plan to consume a vitamin D supplement corresponds to a category of supplements to aid in bone density. Ameliorative labels may be mapped to each of nutrition category table 1204, action category table 1208, supplement category table 1216, and medication category table 1212 using intervention category table 1200. The above-described tables, and entries therein, are provided solely for exemplary purposes. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various additional examples for tables and/or relationships that may be included or recorded in ameliorative classification table consistently with this disclosure.

Referring again to FIG. 10, plan generation module 112 may be configured to generate ameliorative process descriptor 1028 by converting one or more ameliorative labels into narrative language. As a non-limiting example, plan generation module 112 may include a narrative language unit 1012, which may be configured to determine an element of narrative language associated with at least an ameliorative label and include the element of narrative language in current ameliorative label descriptor. Narrative language unit 1012 may implement this, without limitation, by using a language processing unit 216 to detect one or more associations between ameliorative labels, or lists of ameliorative labels, and phrases and/or statements of narrative language. Alternatively or additionally, narrative language unit 1012 may retrieve one or more elements of narrative language from narrative language database 1016, which may contain one or more tables associating ameliorative labels and/or groups of ameliorative labels with words, sentences, and/or phrases of narrative language. One or more elements of narrative language may be included in comprehensive instruction set 116, for instance for display to a user as text describing a current ameliorative status of the user. Ameliorative process descriptor 1028 may further include one or more images; one or more images may be retrieved by plan generation module 112 from an image database 1020, which may contain one or more tables associating ameliorative labels, groups of ameliorative labels, ameliorative process descriptors 1028, or the like with one or more images.

Referring now to FIG. 13, and exemplary embodiment of a narrative language database 1016 is illustrated. Narrative language database 1016 may be implemented as any database and/or datastore suitable for use as biological extraction database 300 as described above. One or more database tables in narrative language database 1016 may include, without limitation, a prognostic description table 1300, which may link prognostic labels to narrative descriptions associated with prognostic labels. One or more database tables in narrative language database 1016 may include, without limitation, an ameliorative description table 1304, which may link ameliorative process labels to narrative descriptions associated with ameliorative process labels. One or more database tables in narrative language database 1016 may include, without limitation, a combined description table 1308, which may link combinations of prognostic labels and ameliorative labels to narrative descriptions associated with the combinations. One or more database tables in narrative language database 1016 may include, without limitation, a paragraph template table 1312, which may contain one or more templates of paragraphs, pages, reports, or the like into which images and text, such as images obtained from image database 1020 and text obtained from prognostic description table 1300, ameliorative description table 1304, and combined description table 1308 may be inserted. Tables in narrative description table 1016 may be populated, as a non-limiting example, using submissions from experts, which may be collected according to any processes described above.

Referring now to FIG. 14, an exemplary embodiment of an image database 1020 is illustrated. Image database 1020 may be implemented as any database and/or datastore suitable for use as biological extraction database 300 as described above. One or more database tables in image database 102 may include, without limitation, a prognostic image table 1400, which may link prognostic labels to images associated with prognostic labels. One or more database tables in image database 1020 may include, without limitation, an ameliorative image table 1404, which may link ameliorative process labels to images associated with ameliorative process labels. One or more database tables in image database 1020 may include, without limitation, a combined description table 1408, which may link combinations of prognostic labels and ameliorative labels to images associated with the combinations. One or more database tables in image database 102 may include, without limitation, a prognostic video table 1412, which may link prognostic labels to videos associated with prognostic labels. One or more database tables in image database 1020 may include, without limitation, an ameliorative video table 1416, which may link ameliorative process labels to videos associated with ameliorative process labels. One or more database tables in image database 1020 may include, without limitation, a combined video table 1420, which may link combinations of prognostic labels and ameliorative labels to videos associated with the combinations. Tables in image database 1020 may be populated, without limitation, by submissions by experts, which may be provided according to any process or process steps described in this disclosure for collection of expert submissions

Referring again to FIG. 10, plan generation module 112 may be configured to receive at least an element of user data and filter diagnostic output using the at least an element of user data. At least an element of user data, as used herein, is any element of data describing the user, user needs, and/or user preferences. At least an element of user data may include a constitutional restriction. At least a constitutional restriction may include any health-based reason that a user may be unable to engage in a given ameliorative process; at least a constitutional restriction may include any counter-indication as described above, including an injury, a diagnosis of something preventing use of one or more ameliorative processes, an allergy or food-sensitivity issue, a medication that is counter-indicated, or the like. At least an element of user data may include at least a user preference. At least a user preference may include, without limitation, any preference to engage in or eschew any ameliorative process and/or other potential elements of a comprehensive instruction set 116, including religious preferences such as forbidden foods, medical interventions, exercise routines, or the like.

Referring to FIG. 15, an exemplary embodiment of a user database 1036 is illustrated. User database 1036 may be implemented as any database and/or datastore suitable for use as biological extraction database 300 as described above. One or more database tables in user database 1036 may include, without limitation, a constitution restriction table 1500; at least a constitutional restriction may be linked to a given user and/or user identifier in a constitutional restriction table 1500. One or more database tables in user database 1036 may include, without limitation, a user preference table 1504; at least a user preference may be linked to a given user and/or user identifier in a user preference table 1504.

Referring again to FIG. 1, artificial intelligence advisory system may include a client interface module 120. Client interface module 120 may include any suitable hardware or software module. Client interface module 120 may be designed and configured to transmit comprehensive instruction set 116 to at least a user client device 124 associated with the user. A user client device 124 may include, without limitation, a display in communication with diagnostic engine 108; display may include any display as described below in reference to FIG. 25. A user client device 124 may include an additional computing device, such as a mobile device, laptop, desktop computer, or the like; as a non-limiting example, the user client device 124 may be a computer and/or workstation operated by a medical professional. Output may be displayed on at least a user client device 124 using an output graphical user interface; output graphical user interface may display at least a current prognostic descriptor 1000, at least a future prognostic descriptor 1024, at least an ameliorative process descriptor 1028, and/or at least an advisor output as described in more detail below.

Still referring to FIG. 1, user client device 124 may generate at least a request for an advisory input. At least a request for an advisory input as used herein is a request for a consultation with at least an informed advisor. Informed advisors may include any person besides the user who has access to information useable to aid user in interaction with artificial intelligence advisory support system. Informed advisors may interact with one another and may form a prognostic support system. Informed advisors may work together to create customized treatment plans around different aspects of a user's life. Informed advisors may provide support, encouragement, mentorship, guidance and/or services to a user. Informed advisors may be categorized according to area of expertise. Informed advisors may include functional medicine professions such as doctors, nurses, physician assistants, nurse practitioners and other members of the health care team as described in more detail below in reference to FIG. 17. Informed advisors may include spiritual professionals who may participate in cultivating spirituality through exercise of practices such as prayer, meditation, breath work, energy work, and the like as described in more detail below in reference to FIG. 17. Informed advisors may include nutrition professionals such as nutritionists, dieticians and chefs who may offer expertise around a user's diet and nutrition state and supplementation as described in more detail below in FIG. 17. Informed advisors may include fitness professionals who may examine the fitness and physical state of a user and may include personal trainers, coaches, group exercise instructors and the like as described below in reference to FIG. 17. Informed advisors may include friends and family members of a user who may create a positive community of support as described below in FIG. 17. Informed advisors may include electronic advisors including electronic behavior coaches and artificial intelligence advisors as described below in more detail in FIG. 17. Certain informed advisors may be uncategorized and may be labeled as miscellaneous informed advisors such as professionals skilled in insurance coverage and/or medical coverage as described in more detail below in FIG. 17. In an embodiment, at least a request for an advisory input may prompt a series of follow-up questions, which may be contained within at least an advisory output.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 1, consultation may include any type of conversation and/or request for conversation with at least an informed advisor such as a live in person meeting with an informed advisor, a meeting with an informed advisor over a network on a device such as a computer, mobile device, or tablet, an email communication, a message sent through a messaging system such as a secure health portal, a phone call, and/or any other various modes of communication. At least a request for an advisory input may be generated by a user, an informed advisor, a user client device 124, and/or an advisory client device 132 as described in more detail below. In an embodiment, a user operating user client device 124 may generate at least a request for an advisory input. For example, a user may generate at least a request for an advisory input through user client device 124 after hiking and experiencing a fall on user's ankle. In such an instance, user may enter data on user client device 124 causing user client device 124 to generate at least a request for an advisory input that includes a description of a specific category of informed advisor such as functional medicine doctors. Advisor module may select at least an informed advisor based on a received request for advisory input as described in more detail below. In yet another non-limiting example, at least a request for an advisory input may be a request that doesn't describe a specific category of informed advisors, such as for example when user may generate a request with a complaint of overall malaise and feeling unwell, without specifying a particular advisor or category thereof that the user wishes to help address the issue. In such an instance, advisor module may select at least an informed advisor that may consist of functional medicine doctors, nutritionists, and fitness professionals who may work in conjunction to generate at least an advisory output examining different aspects of user's complaint. For example, functional medicine doctors may generate at least an advisory output that contains a possible diagnosis such as adrenal fatigue for user's malaise and feeling unwell, nutritionist may generate at least an advisory output that contains recommendations to heal adrenal fatigue from a dietary standpoint such as eliminating trigger foods such as caffeine and sugar and focusing diet on protein and monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats such as avocado, coconut, nuts, seeds, free-range chicken and turkey, and bone broth, and fitness professionals may generate at least an advisory output that contains recommendations for light exercises such as walking and yoga and places restrictions on intense exercise regimens such as spinning, running, and aerobics. In yet another non-limiting example, at least a request for an advisory input may contain a question and/or symptom. In such an instance, the at least a request for an advisory input may be analyzed by advisory module 132, such as by language processing module 216 and matched to an appropriate informed advisor as described in more detail below in FIG. 16. For example, at least at request for an advisory input containing a question such as weight loss may be matched to a fitness professional informed advisor and/or a nutrition professional informed advisor. In yet another non-limiting example, an informed advisor may be matched to a user based on user data and/or diagnostic output as described in more detail below in FIG. 16. For example, a diagnostic output such as a myocardial infarction may be matched to a nutrition professional informed advisor. In an embodiment, at least a request for an advisory input may contain a question and/or description of a symptom that may warrant the need for more details and/or follow-up questions. In such an instance, at least an advisory output may contain a request for more information from a user.

With continued reference to FIG. 1, artificial advisory system 100 includes at least an advisor module 128 executing on the at least a server. At least an advisor module 128 may include any suitable hardware or software module. In an embodiment, at least an advisor module 128 is designed and configured to receive at least a request for an advisory input, generate at least an advisory output using the at least an advisory input and at least a diagnostic output, select at least an informed advisor as a function of the at least a request for an advisory input, and transmit the at least an advisory output to the at least a selected informed advisor. Informed advisors may together create a prognostic support network that functions to assist a user in achieving and maintaining a vibrant constitution as described in more detail below. Informed advisors may function to assist a user in achieving and maintaining a vibrant constitution by providing encouragement, support, mentorship, guidance, and/or services to a user. Prognostic support network may be composed of different categories of informed advisors based on a category of function and support that an informed advisor may be providing to a user. Informed advisors may include artificial intelligence informed advisors that may exchange messaging services and/or protocols with a user as described in more detail below. Informed advisors may include spiritual professionals such as a pastor, rabbi, Buddhist monk and the like. Informed advisors may include nutrition professionals such as a nutritionist, dietician, and chefs. Informed advisors may include fitness professionals such as personal trainers, sports coaches, group exercise instructors and the like. Informed advisors may include functional medicine professionals such as medical doctors, nurses, naturopathic doctors, nurse practitioners, and the like. Informed advisors may include a community of a user's family and friends. Informed advisors may include electronic behavior coaches and other miscellaneous informed advisors as described in more detail below. Diagnostic output may be linked to at least a selected informed advisor by at least an advisor module. Linking may include selecting at least an informed advisor as a function of the at least a diagnostic output. Linking may be learned using a machine learning process as described in more detail below. In an embodiment, linking may include at least a diagnostic output that is presented with at least an informed advisor. For example, at least a diagnostic output such as Celiac disease may be linked to at least an informed advisor consisting of a dietician who can provide inputs and advice as described in more detail below as to how best implement a gluten free diet. At least an advisor module may select at least an informed advisor by matching at least a request for an advisory input to a selected informed advisor as described in more detail below.

Referring now to FIG. 16, an exemplary embodiment of an advisory module 128 is illustrated. Advisory module 128 may be configured to generate an advisor instruction set 1600 as a function of the diagnostic output. Advisory instruction set 1600 may contain any element suitable for inclusion in comprehensive instruction set 116; advisory instruction set 1600 and/or any element thereof may be generated using any process suitable for generation of comprehensive instruction set 116. Advisory instruction set 1600 may include one or more specialized instructions 1604; specialized instructions, as used herein, are instructions the contents of which are selected for display to a particular informed advisor. Selection of instructions for a particular informed advisor may be obtained, without limitation, from information concerning the particular informed advisor, which may be retrieved from a user database 1036 or the like. Selection of instructions for a particular informed advisor may be obtained, without limitation, from prognostic support network database 1608. Prognostic support network database 1608 as described in more detail below, may contain information concerning the particular informed advisor, information concerning a user's past interaction with a particular informed advisor, and/or any other information concerning the informed advisor. As a non-limiting example, where an informed advisor is a doctor, specialized instruction 1604 may include data from biological extraction as described above; specialized instruction may include one or more medical records of user, which may, as a non-limiting example, be downloaded or otherwise received from an external database containing medical records and/or a database (not shown) operating on at least a server 104. As a further non-limiting example medical data relevant to fitness, such as orthopedic reports, may be provided to an informed advisor whose role is as a fitness instructor, coach, or the like. Information provided to informed advisors may be extracted or received from any database described herein, including without limitation biological extraction database 300.

In an embodiment, and with continued reference to FIG. 16, advisory module 128 may be configured to receive at least a request for an advisory input. Advisory module 128 may receive at least a request for an advisory input from user client device 124, advisor client device 132, and/or diagnostic output. User client device 124 and/or advisor client device 132 may be operated by a user and/or at least an informed advisor as described in more detail below. At least a request for an advisory input includes a request for a consultation with at least an informed advisor. At least a request for an advisory input may contain information such as user data, user habits, preferences, religious affiliations, constitutional restrictions, and the like. At least a request for an advisory input may contain a request for a consultation with a specific category of an informed advisor such as for example a request for spiritual and/or religious advice. At least a request for an advisory input may include user specific diagnostic information such as a list of current diagnosed medical conditions, current lab and test results relating to diagnosed medical conditions, treatment plans and actions for diagnosed medical conditions and the like. At least a request for an advisory input may include a user's past interactions with at least an informed advisor and/or contain previously generated requests for at least an advisory input. For example, a user may have requested previously requested to speak with user's pharmacist regarding a side effect user experienced while taking a higher dose of a medication to treat user's hypothyroidism as diagnosed by user's functional medicine physician. History of such a conversation between user and user's pharmacist may be contained within a new request for at least a request for an advisory input when user consults user's functional medicine physician to have the dose of the medication lowered to prevent such a side effect. At least a request for an advisory input may include a question, remark, and/or feedback generated by a user, and/or an informed advisor. For example, a user may generate at least a request for an informed advisor containing a question directed towards user's functional medicine professional regarding a new therapy user may have just started for gout. At least a request for an advisory input may include a remark or question as to whether user even needs to have a consultation with at least an informed advisor. For example, user may generate at least a request for an informed advisor asking if a particular symptom such as sneezing and coughing warrants evaluation by a medical professional or if it self-limiting and will resolve on its own within a few days such as the common cold or spring time allergies. In an embodiment, at least a request for an advisory input may not contain a question for at least an informed advisor but rather may include a description of a symptom that a user may be experiencing. For example, at least a request for an advisory input may contain a description of a swollen eyelid and itchiness user may be experiencing from conjunctivitis. Advisory module 128 generates at least an advisory output using the at least an advisory input and at least a diagnostic output. Advisory output as used herein is any output provided to at least an informed advisor in response to at least a request for an advisory input.

In an embodiment, and continuing to refer to FIG. 15, advisory module 128 may be configured to receive at least an advisory input from an advisor client device, which may include any device suitable for use as a user client device as described above. At least an advisory input may include any information provided by an informed advisor via advisor client device. Advisory input may include medical information and/or advice. Advisory input may include user data, including user habits, preferences, religious affiliations, constitutional restrictions, or the like. Advisory input may include spiritual and/or religious advice. Advisory input may include user-specific diagnostic information. Advisory input may be provided to user client device 124; alternatively or additionally, advisory input may be fed back into system 100, including without limitation insertion into user database 1036, inclusion in or use to update diagnostic engine 108, for instance by augmenting machine-learning models and/or modifying machine-learning outputs via a lazy-learning protocol or the like as described above.

With continued reference to FIG. 16, advisory module 128 may include prognostic support network database 1608. Referring now to FIG. 17 an exemplary embodiment of prognostic support network database 1608 is illustrated. Prognostic support network database 1608 may include one or more entries listing labels associated with one or more informed advisors. Linking may be performed by reference to historical data concerning informed advisors such as previous encounters and/or interactions with specific informed advisors, and/or services provided by an informed advisor. One or more database tables may be linked to one another by, for instance, common column values. Informed advisors may include any person besides the user who has access to information useable to aid user in interaction with artificial intelligence advisory support system. Informed advisors may interact with one another and may aid user together in interaction with artificial intelligence advisory support system. Informed advisors may provide output to user client device 124 and/or advisor client device 132. Informed advisors may receive inputs from user client device 124 and/or advisor client device 132. Inputs and/or outputs may be exchanged using messaging services and/or protocols, including without limitation any instant messaging protocols. Persons skilled in the art, up reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of a multiplicity of communication protocols that may be employed to exchange text messages as described herein. Text messages may be provided in textual form and/or as audio files using, without limitation, speech-to-text and/or text-to-speech algorithms. Informed advisors may provide inputs and/or outputs to one another and/or to user. Informed advisors may work together to create customized treatment plans around different aspects of a user's life. In an embodiment, functional medicine informed advisor such as a medical doctor may diagnose user with hypertension. Functional medicine doctor may then provide an input to nutrition, fitness, and spiritual informed advisors containing user's diagnosis. Nutrition informed advisor such as a nutritionist may provide a nutrition plan that may include implementation of DASH diet as a dietary way to treat hypertension. Fitness informed advisor such as a personal trainer may provide a fitness plan that may include a series of specific exercises that are aimed to reduce hypertension such as intense cardio including running, cycling, and swimming. Spiritual informed advisor such as a meditation teacher may provide user a series of meditative exercises to practice as a calming practice to reduce stress and lower blood pressure. Inputs and/or outputs may be exchanged among informed advisors to modify recommendations and/or treatments as user initiates and implements each recommendation. For example, if user's blood pressure is still elevated after implanting fitness recommendations and nutrition recommendations, functional medicine doctor may recommend adding on a medication to assist in lowering blood pressure such as an ACE inhibitor or diuretic. Informed advisors may provide support, encouragement, mentorship, guidance and/or services to a user. For example, an informed advisor such as a nutrition professional may provide guidance to a user to aid a user in achieving vibrant constitutional guidance through input generated by the nutrition professional through the user of user client device 124 such as a computer. Nutrition professional, as described in more detail below, may provide encouragement, support, mentorship, and/or guidance to a user surrounding nutrition. This may include for example, recommendations such as foods that a user should avoid. For example, a nutrition professional may recommend a user with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus to avoid foods concentrated with simple sugars that may further exacerbate blood sugar spikes and peaks. Informed advisors may interact and work together to aid a user together in interaction with artificial intelligence advisory support system to provide a comprehensive treatment plan that may include spiritual support, nutritional support, fitness support, functional medicine support, friends and family support, miscellaneous support, artificial intelligence support, and electronic behavior coaches to drive behavioral changes. For example, a user diagnosed with Lyme Disease may receive guidance and services from a plurality of informed advisors such as functional medicine professionals who may provide services such as treatments that may include doxycycline to eradicate the Borrelia burgdorferi bacteria, nutrition professionals who may provide services such as custom meal plans for a user that may eliminate dairy products while the user takes doxycycline therapy due to known interactions between calcium ions and doxycycline that lead to blocked absorption of doxycycline, fitness professionals who may provide recommendations for exercises such as walking, stretching, and yoga that may be easy on the joints of a user currently undergoing treatment for Lyme disease, as well as ongoing support and encouragement from family and friends throughout diagnosis, treatment, and beyond.

With continued reference to FIG. 17, prognostic support network database 1608 may include artificial intelligence informed advisors table 1704. Artificial intelligence advisor 1704 may provide output to user client device 124 and/or advisor client device 132. Artificial intelligence advisor 1704 may receive inputs from user client device 124 and/or advisor client device 132. Inputs and/or outputs may be exchanged using messaging services and/or protocols, including without limitation any instant messaging protocols. Persons skilled in the art, up reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of a multiplicity of communication protocols that may be employed to exchange text messages as described herein. Text messages may be provided in textual form and/or as audio files using, without limitation, speech-to-text and/or text-to-speech algorithms. An exemplary embodiment of an artificial intelligence informed advisor 1704 is illustrated below in more detail.

With continued reference to FIG. 17, prognostic support network database 1608 may include spiritual professional informed advisors table 1708. Spiritual professional informed advisors 1708 may include informed advisors focused on the conscious mind body connection. Spiritual professional informed advisors 1708 may include for example a teacher, mentor, and/or coach who may offer guidance, support, insight, and/or services regarding a user's spirituality. Spiritual professional informed advisors 1708 may include individuals associated with certain spiritual religions such as for example a pastor at a church, a rabbi at a synagogue, a member of the Buddhist community, an imam, or the like. Spiritual professional informed advisors 1708 may be non-denominational including for example a teacher, mentor, and/or coach who may not be associated with any particular or specific religious denomination. Spiritual professional informed advisors 1708 may participate in cultivating spirituality through the exercise of certain practices. This may include but is not limited to meditation, prayer, breath work, energy work, somatic techniques, mind heart connections, chanting, asceticism Tai-chi, and Qigong. Meditation may include exercises designed to control a user's attention. Meditation may be practiced by varying techniques by varying spiritual traditions such as Buddhism, Vedanta, Yoga, Tantra, Jainism and the like. Prayer may include exercises directed towards a higher power and may include directing one's mind towards the Divine. Prayer may be scripted or spontaneous, spoken out loud, spoken silently in the mind, or without words. Breath and energy work may include techniques that incorporate breath work practiced in connection to one's body. This may be accompanied with visualization techniques or chanting of certain mantras or words. Breath and energy work may include certain practices such as pranayama from yoga and/or qigong from Daoism. Somatic techniques may utilize certain body postures and movements which may stimulate energy flow. Somatic techniques may include yoga asanas and/or Buddhist mudras for example. Certain mind heart connections and qualities may be developed such as principals that encompass certain core values and beliefs such as tranquility, humility, compassion, trust, devotion, discipline, courage, mindfulness, truthfulness, morality and the like. Chanting may be practiced as a means of devotion and calming of one's mind. Periods of asceticism and self-discipline may be emphasized such as periods of simplicity, vows of silence, retreats, digital detoxes and the like. Coordinated body posture and movement such as Tai-chi and Qigong may be practiced. Spiritual professional informed advisors 1708 may provide output to user client device 124 and/or advisor client device 132. Spiritual professional informed advisors 1708 may receive inputs from user client device 124 and/or advisor client device 132. Inputs and/or outputs may be exchanged using messaging services and/or protocols, including without limitation any instant messaging protocols. Persons skilled in the art, up reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of a multiplicity of communication protocols that may be employed to exchange text messages as described herein. Text messages may be provided in textual form and/or as audio files using, without limitation, speech-to-text and/or text-to-speech algorithms.

With continued reference to FIG. 17 prognostic support network database 1608 may include nutrition professional informed advisors table 1712. Nutrition professional informed advisors 1712 may include informed advisors focused on diet, nutrition, and/or supplementation to support a vibrant constitution of a user. Nutrition professional informed advisors 1712 may include for example nutritionists, dieticians, chefs, and the like. Nutrition professional informed advisors 1712 may offer guidance, support, insight, and/or services regarding a user's meals, supplements, and/or processes aimed towards resolving any identified issues, suggestions, or deficiencies discoverable such as by comprehensive instruction set 116. Nutrition professional informed advisors 1712 may offer for example, services such as but not limited to any food preparation services, food delivery services, vitamin/supplement coaching service, health supplement delivery service, grocery delivery service, or any other applicable platform configured for preparation and delivery of items relating to food/nutrition, health, and wellness. In an embodiment, nutrition professional informed advisors 1712 may coordinate food delivery services to a user's residence that are rich in bone building vitamins such as vitamin D, vitamin K, and/or calcium and which include lots of dark leafy greens such as spinach and kale after a user has suffered a broken bone for example. Nutrition professional informed advisors 1712 may offer supplement recommendations, for example recommending an appropriate dose of iodine for a woman experiencing fibrocystic breast disease who may be unable to obtain appropriate iodine doses from diet alone. Nutrition professional informed advisors 1712 may offer support and encouragement such as for example when a user is transitioning to and maintaining a plant-based diet after suffering a myocardial infarction, nutrition professional informed advisors 1712 may check in on user and encourage user to maintain the plant-based diet. Nutrition professional informed advisors 1712 may generate custom meal plans for a user focused around certain correcting certain deficiencies of a user; for example, a nutritional professional informed advisor 1712 may generate a meal plan that contains iron rich foods including tofu, lentils, pumpkin seeds, dried apricots, and liver for a user who has anemia and/or low ferritin levels. Nutrition professional informed advisor 1712 may suggest services that include follow up appointments and/or conversations that may evaluate progress of a user and/or modify further treatments. For example, nutrition professional informed advisor 1712 may schedule monthly follow up appointments to evaluate progress a child makes while on a gluten free and casein free diet for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Nutrition professional informed advisor 1712 may modify recommendations and/or services after re-checking at least a biological sample. For example, a user who is recommended selenium supplementation for a hypothyroid diagnosis, may have monthly blood tests examining levels of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), Free T4 (thyroxine), Free T3 (triiodothyronine), Total T3, Thyroid antibodies, calcitonin, and thyroglobulin, whereby results may warrant dose adjustment of selenium supplementation. For example, a user who one month after starting selenium supplementation for hypothyroidism and who continues to have elevated TSH levels outside normal limits may be recommended by nutrition professional informed advisor 1712 to increase dose of selenium supplementation. In such an instance, nutrition professional informed advisor 1712 may also recommend adjustment to user's diet such as Nutrition professional informed advisor 1712 may provide output to user client device 124 and/or advisor client device 132. Nutrition professional informed advisor 1712 may receive inputs from user client device 124 and/or advisor client device 132. Inputs and/or outputs may be exchanged using messaging services and/or protocols, including without limitation any instant messaging protocols. Persons skilled in the art, up reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of a multiplicity of communication protocols that may be employed to exchange text messages as described herein. Text messages may be provided in textual form and/or as audio files using, without limitation, speech-to-text and/or text-to-speech algorithms.

With continued reference to FIG. 17, prognostic support network database 1608 may include fitness professional informed advisors table 1716. Fitness professional informed advisors 1716 may include informed advisors focused on the ability of a user to perform a specific function such as to participate in activities such as sports, exercise, movement, and/or activities of daily life. Fitness professionals may include for example, personal trainers, sports coaches, yoga instructors, group exercise instructors, athletic trainers, physical therapists, fitness instructors, authors of fitness instruction books or manuals, experts in kinesiology, and/or experts skilled in anatomy and/or biomechanics. Fitness professional informed advisors 1716 may offer guidance, support, insight, and/or services regarding a user's fitness state. Fitness professional informed advisors 1716 may offer services such as but not limited to fitness coaching services, fitness plans that may include exercises to be performed by a user on specific days of a month for example, reminders such as phone calls to a user to encourage participation in a fitness program or regimen, home delivery of fitness services such as fitness instruction in a user's home or office either live in person or delivered to a device such as a mobile phone, tablet, computer, and/or television of a user, and/or any other delivery of services relating to fitness, health, and wellness. Fitness professional informed advisors 1716 may offer guidance such as recommendations as to how often a user should participate in a fitness protocol or regimen, what types of fitness activities a user should participate in, as well as fitness activities that a user should not engage in. For example, a fitness professional such as a fitness coach may offer guidance to a user diagnosed with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy to avoid participation in contact sports such as ice hockey, tackle football, and boxing but may encourage participation in bowling, golf, and sailing. Fitness professional informed advisors 1716 may generate a fitness plan capturing such guidance that may contain a schedule with days and times dedicated to recommended activities. Fitness professional informed advisor 1716 may provide support to a user participating in a fitness regimen. For example, fitness professional informed advisor 1716 may support a user recovering from a hip replacement to engage in mobility exercises once discharged from the hospital so as to encourage movement and prevent formation of a blood clot. In such an instance, fitness professional informed advisor 1716 may provide support by calling user and/or user's caregivers to encourage user to engage in mobility exercises, and/or by visiting user at home and engaging in mobility exercises alongside user and/or helping user participate in such exercises. Fitness professional informed advisor 1716 may provide insight to a user such as for example providing a user with insights as to how to best lift hand weights to a user who has a broken arm but has full mobility in the other arm. Fitness professional informed advisor 1716 may provide services such as fitness coaching and/or fitness instruction surrounding a user's preference and physical state. For example, fitness professional informed advisor 1716 may provide Pilates instruction to a user who requires and/or is interested in becoming more flexible and/or improving posture. In yet another non-limiting example, fitness professional informed advisor 1716 may provide instruction to a user and/or a group of users remotely such as broadcasting over an internet connection projected onto a television or tablet. Fitness professional informed advisor 1716 may provide output to user client device 124 and/or advisor client device 132. Fitness professional informed advisor 1716 may receive inputs from user client device 124 and/or advisor client device 132. Inputs and/or outputs may be exchanged using messaging services and/or protocols, including without limitation any instant messaging protocols. Persons skilled in the art, up reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of a multiplicity of communication protocols that may be employed to exchange text messages as described herein. Text messages may be provided in textual form and/or as audio files using, without limitation, speech-to-text and/or text-to-speech algorithms.

With continued reference to FIG. 17 prognostic support network database 1608 may include functional medicine informed advisors table 1720. Functional medicine informed advisors 1720 may include medical professionals who engage in the practice of functional medicine. Functional medicine, as used herein, includes an integrative approach to medicine that incorporates traditional Western medical practices with alternative approaches such as but not limited to acupuncture, botanicals, therapeutic diets, detoxification programs, and stress-management techniques. Functional medicine may perform a comprehensive analysis examining internal components such as mind, body, and spirit in conjunction with external components such as physical and social environmental factors that affect a user's health and well-being. Functional medicine may focus on root cause analysis to prevent and reverse disease states. Functional medicine informed advisors 1720 may include for example medical doctors, osteopathic medicine doctors, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, chiropractic doctors, naturopathic doctors, pharmacists, nurses, licensed practical nurses, psychologists, respiratory therapists, social workers, x-ray technicians, pharmacy technicians, mental health professionals, medical assistants, and the like. In addition to meeting licensing requirements and certifications including both state and federal requirements to practice as a medical professional, function medicine professionals may have additional certifications and licenses that may enable certification as a functional medicine specialist. Functional medicine informed advisors 1720 may be certified by certain credentialing boards, such as for example THE INSTITUTE FOR FUNCTIONAL MEDICINE of Federal Way, Wash., or the AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ANTI-AGING MEDICINE (A4M) of Boca Raton, Fla. Functional medicine informed advisors 1720 may have met certain requirements such as attending certain functional medicine conferences, attending certain functional medicine classes and/or holding certified functional medicine badges and/or certificates. In an embodiment, functional medicine informed advisors 1720 may be subjected to certain requirements and/or selection criteria to participate in system 100. For example, functional medicine professionals with less than one year of practice in a functional medicine setting may be ineligible to participate in system 100. In yet another non-limiting example, medical professionals who have not yet completed any functional medicine training may be ineligible to participate in system 100. Functional medicine informed advisors 1720 may offer services such as but not limited to the delivery of medical advice, examination of a user, providing a medical diagnosis to a user, performing and/or ordering tests that may aid in providing a medical diagnosis, delivery of a medical treatment plan, delivery of medical treatment, and/or any other applicable platform configured for preparation and delivery of items relating to medical examination, diagnosis, and treatment. For example, a nurse practitioner may examine a user presenting with an itchy blistering rash, red spots, fatigue, fever, loss of appetite, swollen lymph nodes, and pruritis and diagnose the user with varicella, commonly known as chicken pox. Functional medicine informed advisors 1720 may interact with and utilize artificial intelligence informed advisors 1704 to aid in providing medical advice. For example, artificial intelligence informed advisors 1704 may provide an output of three possible diagnoses. Functional medicine informed advisor 1720 may then utilize patient presentation and chief complaint and symptomatology in combination with three possible diagnoses provided for by artificial intelligence informed advisor 1704 to generate a diagnosis. For example, a user who presents with a red rash that is painful to the touch, contains fluid-filled blisters that break and crust over, is and causes numbness or tingling may cause artificial intelligence informed advisor to generate three possible diagnoses including chicken pox, shingles, or contact dermatitis. Functional medicine informed advisor 1720 such as a medical doctor, may utilize medical background and training and upon visual inspection and discussion with user who discloses a previous diagnosis in childhood of chicken pox, may correctly diagnose user as having shingles. Functional medicine informed advisor 1720 may provide output to user client device 124 and/or advisor client device 132. Functional medicine professional may receive inputs from user client device 124 and/or advisor client device 132. Inputs and/or outputs may be exchanged using messaging services and/or protocols, including without limitation any instant messaging protocols. Persons skilled in the art, up reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of a multiplicity of communication protocols that may be employed to exchange text messages as described herein. Text messages may be provided in textual form and/or as audio files using, without limitation, speech-to-text and/or text-to-speech algorithms.

With continued reference to FIG. 17, prognostic support network database table 1608 may include informed advisors consisting of family and friends 1724. Family and friends 1724 may include any family member, friend, acquittance or co-worker of a user who is present in a user's life and may provide guidance, support, insight, and/or services to assist a user in achieving a vibrant constitution. Friends and family may create a community of support to aid and encourage a user to achieve and maintain a vibrant constitution. For example, a user diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS) may be started by a nutrition professional informed advisor 1712 on the Wahls protocol diet which emphasizes a nutrient-rich paleo diet as part of a protocol to reverse and potentially even eliminate all symptoms of MS. Friends and family 1724 may create a community of support around user to encourage user to strictly adhere to the Wahls diet. For example, a neighbor who has user over for dinner may cook a meal that is compliant with the Wahls protocol. In yet another non-limiting example, a user who has been diagnosed with obesity may receive encouragement and support from friends to engage in physical exercise every day. In such an instance, friends may form a community of support around user by taking turns engaging in some sort of physical exercise with user. Each day of the week may be assigned to a different friend or family member of user who may show up to user's home and engage in some sort of activity with user such as walking outside in fresh air for 30 minutes, going to a park to jog together, and/or showing up for a group exercise class together. Family and friends 1724 may also support and encouragement by providing user with messages of encouragement and/or support to encourage user to comply with a treatment plan. For example, a family member of user may send user a text once per week encouraging user to continue to adhere to a Paleo Diet as part of user's treatment plan generated by a functional medical doctor after user has been diagnosed with Ulcerative Colitis. In yet another non-limiting example, a friend of user may provide encouragement and/or support by sending user an email checking in with user to see if user has lost weight as recommended by a nutrition professional. Family and friends 1724 may provide output to user client device 124 and/or advisor client device 132. Family and friends 1724 may receive inputs from user client device 124 and/or advisor client device 132. Inputs and/or outputs may be exchanged using messaging services and/or protocols, including without limitation any instant messaging protocols. Persons skilled in the art, up reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of a multiplicity of communication protocols that may be employed to exchange text messages as described herein. Text messages may be provided in textual form and/or as audio files using, without limitation, speech-to-text and/or text-to-speech algorithms.

With continued reference to FIG. 17, prognostic support network database 1608 may include electronic behavior coach table 1728. Electronic behavior coach 1728 may include any professional who work with a user electronically to facilitate healthy and sustainable changes in behaviors so that a user can increase user's effectiveness at work, home, study, and/or in social situations. Electronic behavior coach informed advisors 1728 may include for example, psychologists, psychiatrists, clinical social workers, and master's level mental health professionals. Electronic behavior coach informed advisor 1728 may provide services to a user with a face to face meeting electronically such as through teleconferences delivered over a network to a user's mobile phone, tablet, computer, or television. Electronic behavior coach informed advisor 1728 may utilize artificial intelligence informed advisors 1608 to generate chat bots that contain meaningful messages and advice to facilitate behavioral changes. Electronic behavior coach informed advisors 1728 may provide guidance and support utilizing principles of positive psychology, philosophy, motivational interviewing and goal setting to assist a user in altering their actions, reactions, and behavioral patterns. Electronic behavior coach informed advisors 1728 may assist with certain areas of a user's life such as but not limited to work-life balance, emotional support, anger management, substance abuse, mental health and lifestyle, eating disorders, depression, anxiety, alcohol abuse, gender identity, transgender, sexuality, bipolar disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy coaching, dialectical behavioral therapy coaching, parenting skills, and/or personality disorders. Electronic behavior coach informed advisors 1728 may assist a user in ensuring adherence and/or compliance with a certain regimen. Electronic behavior coach informed advisors 1728 may provide output to user client device 124 and/or advisor client device 132. Electronic behavior coach informed advisors 1728 may receive inputs from user client device 124 and/or advisor client device 132. Inputs and/or outputs may be exchanged using messaging services and/or protocols, including without limitation any instant messaging protocols. Persons skilled in the art, up reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of a multiplicity of communication protocols that may be employed to exchange text messages as described herein. Text messages may be provided in textual form and/or as audio files using, without limitation, speech-to-text and/or text-to-speech algorithms.

With continued reference to FIG. 17, prognostic support network database 1608 may include miscellaneous informed advisors table 1732. Miscellaneous informed advisors 1732 may include anyone with access to information to aid user in interaction with artificial intelligence advisory support system who may not fit into any of the other categories of FIG. 17. Miscellaneous informed advisors 1732 may include for example, informed advisors pertaining to insurance, such as for example insurance brokers and/or underwriters. Miscellaneous informed advisors 1732 may include informed advisors pertaining to any other applicable industry. Miscellaneous informed advisors 1732 may provide output to user client device 124 and/or advisor client device 132. Miscellaneous informed advisors 1732 may receive inputs from user client device 124 and/or advisor client device 132. Inputs and/or outputs may be exchanged using messaging services and/or protocols, including without limitation any instant messaging protocols. Persons skilled in the art, up reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of a multiplicity of communication protocols that may be employed to exchange text messages as described herein. Text messages may be provided in textual form and/or as audio files using, without limitation, speech-to-text and/or text-to-speech algorithms.

Referring again to FIG. 16, advisory module 132 may utilize prognostic support network database 1608 to match at least a request for an advisory input to at least an informed advisor. One or more database tables in prognostic support network database 1608 may link at least a request for an advisory input to at least an informed advisor database associated with at least a request for an advisory input. One or more database tables in prognostic support network database 1608 may include, without limitation, an artificial intelligence informed advisor table 1704, which may link at least a request for an advisory input to at least an artificial intelligence informed advisor. One or more database tables in prognostic support network database 1608 may include, without limitation, a spiritual professional informed advisor table 1708, which may link at least a request for an advisory input to at least a spiritual professional informed advisor. One or more database tables in prognostic support network database 1608 may include, without limitation, a nutrition professional informed advisor table 1712, which may link at least a request for an advisory input to at least a nutrition professional informed advisor. One or more database tables in prognostic support network database 1608 may include, without limitation, a fitness professional informed advisor table 1716, which may link at least a request for an advisory input to at least a fitness professional informed advisor. One or more database tables in prognostic support network database 1608 may include, without limitation, a functional medicine informed advisor table 1720, which may link at least a request for an advisory input to at least a functional medicine informed advisor. One or more database tables in prognostic support network database 1608 may include, without limitation, a friends and family informed advisor table 1724, which may link at least a request for an advisory input to at least a friends and family informed advisor. One or more database tables in prognostic support network database 1608 may include, without limitation an electronic behavior coach informed advisor table 1728, which may link at least a request for an advisory input to an electronic behavior coach informed advisor. One or more database tables in prognostic support network database 1608 may include, without limitation, a miscellaneous informed advisors table 1732, which may link at least a request for an advisory input to at least a miscellaneous informed advisor. Tables in prognostic support network database 1608 may be populated, without limitation, by submissions by informed advisors, which may be provided according to any process or process steps described in this disclosure for receiving an advisory input.

With continued reference to FIG. 16, at least a diagnostic output may be utilized to match at least a request for an advisory input to at least an informed advisor. At least a request for an advisory input may contain information pertaining to user's current status user's diagnostic output such as whether user may be experiencing a condition or symptom. Advisory module 132 may parse through such information, as a non-limiting example, using language processing module 216 to match at least a request for an advisory input to at least an informed advisor. For example, at least a request for an advisory input that contains language indicating an acute medical emergency may be matched to a functional medicine informed advisor. In yet another non-limiting example, at least a request for an advisory input that contains information pertaining to a side effect user is experiencing after initiating a vegan diet may be matched to a nutrition professional informed advisor. In yet another non-limiting example, at least a request for an advisory input that contains language indicating that a user is feeling overwhelmed and upset after initiating a sugar free diet to eliminate a Candida albicans infection may be matched to a friends and family informed advisor. In an embodiment, diagnostic output may automatically be matched to at least an informed advisor. For example, a diagnosis output of diabetes may be matched to a nutrition professional informed advisor and/or a fitness professional informed advisor. In yet another non-limiting example, at least a diagnostic output may contain information so as to not match to at least an informed advisor. For example, at least a diagnostic output such as breast cancer may match to at least an informed advisor consisting of a functional medicine professional such as an oncologist but may not match a functional medicine professional such as a trauma surgeon or an orthopedic surgeon. In an embodiment, diagnostic output may be linked to a user identifier contained within prognostic support network database 1608 and may contain information pertaining to informed advisors user has previously interacted with and/or utilized and/or information pertaining to informed advisors user may currently be working with. For example, at least a diagnostic output such as diabetes may match to a functional medicine informed advisor such as an endocrinologist. Diagnostic output may link to information contained within prognostic support network database 1608 that identifies user and matches to endocrinologist user has been seeing for insulin prescriptions.

With continued reference to FIG. 16, at least an informed advisor may be matched as a function of user information. User may provide information such as a current spiritual professional user has been working with to receive spiritual guidance and conditioning and/or current functional medicine professional user has been having appointments with. In an embodiment, user may provide information such as user's preference for an at least an informed advisor in a certain geographical location. For example, a user who lives in Hana, Hi. may request informed advisors locally such as those found on the island of Maui. User may also provide preferences and dislikes for certain geographical locations of informed advisors. For example, a user who lives in Boston, Mass. may request informed advisors in Suffolk County but may request to not be matched and/or work with informed advisors located on Martha's Vineyard or Nantucket. Similarly, if a user travels frequently such as between different homes or for work user may customize a request for informed advisors in multiple locations. User may also provide preferences as to informed advisors, such as a male user who requests to not be matched to a female functional medicine doctor or a female user who requests to not be matched to a male functional medicine doctor. In yet another embodiment, user may customize preferences as to which categories of informed advisors user may wish to work with. For example, a user who practices Buddhism may request a preference to not receive spiritual guidance from a Catholic priest. In an embodiment, user may choose not to work with an informed advisor if user doesn't get along with the selected informed advisor and/or user doesn't particularly like the selected informed advisor. In such an instance, the next available informed advisor on the list may be selected and/or a new list may be generated to reflect an update in user's preferences.

With continued reference to FIG. 16, matching at least a request for an advisory input may be performed through a series of interactions to narrow down a selection of potential informed advisors. In an embodiment, a user may generate at least a request for an advisory input containing a description of a symptom user may be experiencing. Diagnostic output may contain user-specific health context for this symptom. System 100 may then make a query based on information contained within prognostic support network database 1608. Linking may occur between information contained within the at least a request for an advisory input, diagnostic output, and/or information contained within prognostic support network database 1608. A list of potential informed advisors may be generated. List may then be adjusted eliminating informed advisors who may not meet certain criteria user has provided such as informed advisors who are outside of user's geographical preference or who may not have certain educational requirements and/or be of user's preferred gender and/or some other limitation user may have requested. For example, a user may enter a description of a symptom such as eye pain, redness, swelling, and/or tenderness. Diagnostic output may contain a list of possible diagnoses including conjunctivitis, allergic conjunctivitis, and sty. Diagnostic output may then make a query within prognostic support network database 1608 to gather information such as appropriate informed advisor tables that advisory input may be best matched with. In such an instance, a list of potential informed advisors including functional primary care physicians, optometrists, and ophthalmologists may be generated. List may include a large selection which may then be narrowed down based on if user may be an established patient with an optometrist or ophthalmologist located on the generated list. For example, user's optometrist who user has an appointment with at least once per year may be selected. In such an instance, list may also include user's functional primary care physician. User may eliminate such a choice if user feels that seeing an eye specialist such as an optometrist or ophthalmologist may be more appropriate. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of the disclosure, will be aware of other examples.

With continued reference to FIG. 16, diagnostic output may be utilized to generate an advisory output and/or specialized instruction set 1604. Diagnostic output may be utilized to generate at least an advisory output. For example, diagnostic output that contains depression may be utilized to generate at least an advisory output identifies a spiritual informed advisor to create a custom plan that includes meditation and deep breathing exercise. In yet another non-limiting example, a diagnostic output that includes obesity may be utilized to generate an advisory output that identifies a fitness professional informed advisor. Specialized instruction set 1604 may contain particular instructions for an informed advisor as described in more detail above in reference to FIG. 16. Specialized instruction set may be generated from diagnostic output and/or user database 1036. For example, a diagnostic output such as stage 4 brain cancer may contain a specialized instruction set containing information pertaining to such a diagnosis. In such an instance, specialized instruction set may contain biological extraction data such as a complete blood count (CBC) indicating abnormally high white blood cells. Specialized instruction set may contain medical records such as previous CT scans and/or MRI's performed that confirmed such a diagnosis. In yet another non-limiting example, a diagnostic output such as diabetes may result in a meeting with a nutritional informed advisor. In such an instance, nutritional professional may be provided with a specialized instruction set containing biological extraction data such as previous fasting blood sugar readings and/or medical records containing information pertinent to user's diabetes treatment such as current medications, previously tried medications, and/or supplements user may be currently taking.

With continued reference to FIG. 16, advisory output and/or specialized instruction set may be generated a function of user preference and/or user provided information. In an embodiment, user may provide information pertaining to user's preference to not participate in certain types of physical activities or exercises. For example, user have a dislike for jogging, and/or running and user may provide information pertaining to such a preference. In such an instance, advisory output and/or specialized instruction may be customizable to user so that a fitness professional does not recommend jogging or running to user. In yet another non-limiting example, user may have a certain friend and/or family member that user does not want to be part of user's friends and family informed advisor. In such an instance, advisory output and/or specialized instruction set may not be generated by such a person. In such an instance, the friend and/or family member may not be granted access to any of user's information contained within system 100.

With continued reference to FIG. 16, advisory output and/or specialized instruction set may be generated as a function of information contained within prognostic support network database 1608. In an embodiment, advisory output containing a treatment for strep throat for a user may not contain a recommendation of penicillin if information contained within prognostic support network database 1608 indicates that user has a severe allergic reaction to penicillin. In yet another embodiment, information contained within prognostic support network database 1608 may be utilized to guide transmission of specialized instruction set. For example, a user who resides in Denver, Colo. may have a preference for informed advisors within Denver, Aurora, and Lakewood. In such an instance, prognostic support network database 1608 may not transmit specialized instruction set to an informed advisor located in Boulder or Colorado Springs.

With continued reference to FIG. 16, specialized instruction set and/or advisory output may be generated based on preferences customizable to user. Specialized instruction set and/or advisory output may be generated based on factors that include: the at least a request for an advisory input, diagnostic output, user provided preferences, and/or prognostic support network 1608. Such factors allow preferences to be set and user to customize preferences to the particular situation of each individual user.

With continued reference to FIG. 16, advisory support module 128 includes artificial intelligence module 1612. Artificial intelligence module 1612 may provide output to user client device 124 and/or advisor client device 132. Artificial intelligence module 1612 may receive inputs from user client device 124 and/or advisor client device 132. Inputs and/or outputs may be exchanged using messaging services and/or protocols, including without limitation any instant messaging protocols. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of a multiplicity of communication protocols that may be employed to exchange text messages as described herein. Text messages may be provided in textual form and/or as audio files using, without limitation, speech-to-text and/or text-to-speech algorithms.

Referring now to FIG. 18, an exemplary embodiment of an artificial intelligence advisor 1612 is illustrated. Artificial intelligence advisor 1612 may include a user communication learner 1800. User communication learner 1800 may be any form of machine-learning learner as described above, implementing any form of language processing and/or machine learning. In an embodiment, user communication learner 1800 may include a general learner 1804; general learner 1804 may be a learner that derives relationships between user inputs and correct outputs using a training set that includes, without limitation, a corpus of previous conversations. Corpus of previous conversations may be logged by at least a server 104 as conversations take place; user feedback, and/or one or more functions indicating degree of success of a conversation may be used to differentiate between positive input-output pairs to use for training and negative input-output pairs not to use for training. Outputs may include textual strings and/or outputs from any databases, modules, and/or learners as described in this disclosure, including without limitation prognostic labels, prognostic descriptors, ameliorative labels, ameliorative descriptors, user information, or the like; for instance, general learner 1804 may determine that some inputs optimally map to textual response outputs, while other inputs map to outputs created by retrieval of module and/or database outputs, such as retrieval of prognostic descriptors, ameliorative descriptors, or the like. User communication learner may include a user-specific learner 1808, which may generate one or more modules that learn input-output pairs pertaining to communication with a particular user; a user specific learner 1808 may initially use input-output pairs established by general learner 1804 and may modify such pairs to match optimal conversation with the particular user by iteratively minimizing an error function.

Still referring to FIG. 18, general learner 1804 and/or user-specific learner 1808 may initialize, prior to training, using one or more record retrieved from a default response database 1812. Default response database 1812 may link inputs to outputs according to initial relationships entered by users, including without limitation experts as described above, and/or as created by a previous instance or version of general learner 1804 and/or user-specific learner 1808. Default response database 1812 may periodically be updated with information from newly generated instances of general learner 1804 and/or user-specific learner 1808. Inputs received by artificial intelligence advisor 1612 may be mapped to canonical and/or representative inputs by synonym detection as performed, for instance, by a language processing module 216; language processing module 216 may be involved in textual analysis and/or generation of text at any other point in machine-learning and/or communication processes undergone by artificial intelligence advisor 1704.

Referring now to FIG. 19, an exemplary embodiment of a default response database 1812 is illustrated. Default response database 1812 may be implemented as any database and/or datastore suitable for use as biological extraction database 300 as described above. One or more database tables in default response database 1812 may include, without limitation, an input/output table 1900, which may link default inputs to default outputs. Default response database 1812 may include a user table 1904, which may, for instance, map users and/or a user client device 124 to particular user-specific learners and/or past conversations. Default response database 1812 may include a user preference table 1908 listing preferred modes of address, turns of phrase, or other user-specific communication preferences. Default response database 1812 may include a general preference table 1912, which may track, for instance, output-input pairings associated with greater degrees of user satisfaction.

Referring again to FIG. 18, artificial intelligence advisor 1704 may include a consultation initiator configured to detect a consultation event in a user textual conversation and initiate a consultation with an informed advisor as a function of the consultation event. A consultation event, as used herein, is a situation where an informed advisor is needed to address a user's situation or concerns, such as when a user should be consulting with a doctor regarding an apparent medical emergency or new condition, or with an advisor who can lend emotional support when particularly distraught. Detection may be performed, without limitation, by matching an input and/or set of inputs to an output that constitutes an action of initiating a consultation; such a pairing of an input and/or input set may be learned using a machine learning process, for instance via general learner 1804 and/or user specific learner 1808. In the latter case, information concerning a particular user's physical or emotional needs or condition may be a part of the training set used to generate the input/input set to consultation event pairing; for instance, a user with a history of heart disease may trigger consultation events upon any inputs describing shortness of breath, chest discomfort, arrhythmia, or the like. Initiation of consultation may include transmitting a message to an advisor client device 132 associated with an appropriate informed advisor, such as without limitation transmission of information regarding a potential medical emergency to a doctor able to assist in treating the emergency. Initiation of consultation may alternatively or additionally include providing an output to the user informing the user that a consultation with an informed advisor, who may be specified by name or role, is advisable. Consultation with at least an informed advisor may include any of the informed advisors making up prognostic support network database 1608 as illustrated in FIG. 17.

With continued reference to FIG. 15, advisory module 128 may output, with advisory output, a textual entry field 1616. Textual entry field 1616 may include a searchable input field that allows entry of a search term such as a word or phrase to be entered by a user such as an informed advisor. In an embodiment, textual entry field 1616 may allow for entry of a search term to be matched with labels contained within the at least at diagnostic output. For example, an informed advisor such as a medical professional may enter into a search term a results of a fasting glucose test after receiving at least a diagnostic output of diabetes. In such an instance, user such as an informed advisor may be able to search multiple results such as fasting glucose test levels recorded over a certain period of time such as several years and/or months. In yet another non-limiting example, an informed advisor such as a fitness professional may search for user's most recent exercise log and/or nutrition records. In yet another non-limiting example, an informed advisor such as a nurse practitioner may enter information into textual entry field 1616 to search for information pertaining to user's medication history after receiving at least a diagnostic output of acute kidney injury. In an embodiment, textual entry field 1616 may allow a user such as an informed advisor to navigate different areas of advisory output. For example, an informed advisor may utilize textual entry field 1616 to navigate to different locations such as a table of contents, and or sections organized into different categories as described in more detail below.

With continued reference to FIG. 15, advisory module 128 may include in an advisory output a category field 1620. Category field 1620 may include a textual field that contains advisory output organized into categories. Category, as used herein, is any breakdown of advisory output by shared characteristics. Categories may include for example, breakdown by informed advisor type. For example, informed advisors may be categorized into categories of expertise such as spiritual professionals, nutrition professionals, fitness professionals and the like. Categories may include sub-categories of specialties such as for example functional medicine informed advisors may be organized into sub-categories based on body system they may be treating. This could include sub-categories such as dermatology specialists, Genito-urology specialists, gastroenterology specialists, neurology specialists and the like. Categories may include a breakdown by time such as chronological order and/or reverse chronological order. Categories may be modified and/or organized into test results such as for example all complete blood counts that a user has ever had performed may be located in one category, and all CT scans that a user has had performed may be located in another category. Categories may include a breakdown by relevance, such as highly relevant test results and/or test results that are outside normal limits.

With continued reference to FIG. 15, advisory module 128 may include in an advisory output a relevance field 1624. Relevance field 1624 as used herein is a textual field that contains advisory output information labeled as being relevant. Relevance, as used herein, is any information contained within advisory output that is closely connected and/or related to diagnostic output. Relevance may include information that would be of interest to a particular category of informed advisor. For example, an informed advisor such as an ophthalmologist may deem information contained within at least an advisory output such as a measurement of a user's intra-ocular pressure to be of relevance, while an advisory output containing information summarizing a user's last appointment with a podiatrist to not be of relevance. In yet another non-limiting example, an informed advisor such as a fitness professional may deem information contained within an advisory output such as a summary of a user's last appointment with an orthopedic doctor to be relevant while a summary of a user's last colonoscopy may not be relevant. In an embodiment, relevance may be viewed on a continuum. Information contained within at least an advisory output that directly relates to an informed advisor and is of high probative value to an informed advisor may be highly relevant. For example, a nutritionist may deem a journal of a user's eating habits as highly relevant. In yet another non-limiting example, a spiritual professional may deem a summary of a user's church patterns as highly relevant. Information that is related to an informed advisor but does not directly affect an informed advisor may be moderately relevant. For example, a dermatologist may deem information pertaining to a user's last physical exam with an internal medicine doctor to be moderately relevant. In yet another non-limiting example, an endocrinologist may deem information pertaining to a user's last appointment with a podiatrist to be moderately relevant for a user diagnosed with diabetes. Information that is not related to an informed advisor and does not affect an informed advisor may be of low relevance. For example, a trauma surgeon may deem information about a user's last dental cleaning to be of low relevance. In yet another non-limiting example, a cardiologist may deem information about a user's last bone density scan to be of low relevance. In an embodiment, user such as informed advisor may use textual entry field 1616 to navigate advisory output to find information that is relevant. In an embodiment, information contained within at least an advisory output may be marked as relevant such as by another informed advisor. For example, a functional medicine doctor may mark an elevated fasting blood glucose level as relevant before transmitting such a result to a nutrition professional.

In an embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 15, a relevance field 1624 may include an image, link, or other visual element that an informed advisor may select or otherwise interact with to expand or contract a portion of advisory output; for instance, relevance field 1624 may include a symbol next to or on a section heading that can cause a corresponding section of text to display when activated a first time and disappear when activated a second time. As a result, an informed advisor may be presented initially with some text visible and other text not visible; initial presentation may hide all text but section headers. Alternatively or additionally, where informed advisor belongs to a particular category of informed advisor and/or has a profile in, for instance, an advisory database indicating categories of interest to the informed advisor, sections of text and/or images related to such categories may initially display while other sections do not display unless a relevance field 1624 corresponding to such sections is selected by the informed advisor.

With continued reference to FIG. 15, advisory module 128 may contain an advisory database 1628. Advisory database 1628 may be implemented as any database and/or datastore suitable for use as an advisory database. An exemplary embodiment of an advisory database 1628 is provided below in FIG. 21.

Referring back now to FIG. 1, artificial intelligence advisory system includes at least an advisor client device 132. Advisor client device 132 may include any device suitable for use as a user client device 124 as described above; that is, at least an advisory output may be output to the user client device 124. Alternatively or additionally, at least an advisor client device 132 may be operated by an informed advisor. Informed advisor, as used herein, includes any person besides the user who has access to information useable to aid user in interaction with artificial intelligence advisory system. Advisor client device 132 may be utilized by an informed advisor to generate at least a request for an advisory input. For example, informed advisor such as a nutrition professional who has just met with a user diagnosed with high cholesterol may generate at least a request for an advisory input using advisor client device 132 for user to speak with a fitness professional and develop a fitness regimen as part of a regimen to reduce user's high cholesterol. In such an instance, informed advisor utilizing advisor client device 132 to generate at least a request for an advisory input may select a specific category of informed advisor such as functional medical professional, fitness professional, nutrition professional and the like or informed advisor may utilize advisor client device 132 to generate at least a request for an advisory input that does not contain a request for a specific category of informed advisor. In such an instance, advisor module may select at least an informed advisor as a function of the at least a request for an advisory input.

Referring now to FIG. 20, a method 2000 for an artificial intelligence advisory support module for vibrant constitutional guidance is illustrated. At step 2005 at least a diagnostic engine operating on at least a server receives at least a biological extraction from a user; this may be implemented, without limitation, as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-19. Biological extraction may include any extraction as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-19.

With continued reference to FIG. 20, at step 2010 diagnostic engine 108 generates a diagnostic output based on the at least a biological extraction. The diagnostic output including at least a prognostic label and at least an ameliorative process label; this may be implemented, without limitation, as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-19.

With continued reference to FIG. 20, at step 2015 at least an advisor module operating on at least a server receives at least a request for an advisory input. Receiving at least a request for an advisory input may be implemented, without limitation, as described above in FIGS. 1-19. At least a request for an advisory input may be received from user client device 124, advisor client device 132, user, informed advisor, diagnostic output and/or artificial intelligence advisor 1608 as described above in more detail in FIGS. 1-19.

With continued reference to FIG. 20, at step 2020 at least an advisor module operating on at least a server generates at least an advisory output using the at least an advisory input and at least a diagnostic output. Generating an advisory output may include generating an advisor instruction set. Generating an advisor instruction set may be performed by any of the methods as described above in reference to FIG. 16. This may include for example, generating an advisory output as a function of user preference and/or information contained within prognostic support network database 1608 as described in more detail above in FIG. 16.

With continued reference to FIG. 20, generating at least an advisory output may include using the at least an advisory output to generate a feedback mechanism with diagnostic engine as described in more detail above in FIG. 2. In an embodiment, advisor may provide input via the advisory client device and/or advisory module. For example, informed advisor may provide feedback as to the accuracy of at least a diagnostic output and/or which diagnostic output from a list informed advisor has selected. Advisor input pertaining to diagnostic output may be utilized for example generate a new diagnostic output based on the at least a biological extraction. For example, advisor input may be used to modify at least a biological extraction and/or generate a new biological extraction, which may be provided to diagnostic engine 108 and used to generate a new and/or update diagnostic output. Advisor input pertaining to diagnostic output such as accuracy and/or inaccuracy of diagnostic output may also create a feedback loop whereby advisor input as to diagnostic output may be utilized to update training data; updated training data may be used in conjunction with at least a biological extraction to generate a new diagnostic output at diagnostic engine 108. Newly generate diagnostic output, which may be generated according to any process and/or process steps as described above, may be used to generate new advisory outputs, which may also be generated according to any means or method as described above. Feedback mechanisms may also exist between informed advisors such as when a diagnostic output is transmitted to another informed advisor such as for example to get a second opinion and/or refer a user to a specialist.

With continued reference to FIG. 20, at step 2025 at least an advisor module operating on at least a server selects at least an informed advisor as a function of the at least a request for an advisory input. Selecting at least an informed advisor may include matching the at least a request for an advisory input to the at least an informed advisor. Matching may include for example matching an input to an output that constitutes a specific informed advisor. Matching may be learned using a machine learning process, for instance via general learner 1804 and/or user specific learner 1808. For example, information concerning a particular request for an advisory input may be part of a training set used to generate the matching between at least a request for an advisory input and selecting at least an informed advisor. For example, at least a request for an advisory input concerning a user with a history of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus may be matched to at least a functional medicine professional when at least a request for an advisory input describes frequent urination, extreme thirst, hyperglycemic blood sugar readings, hypoglycemic blood sugar readings, fruity-smelling breath, presence of ketones in the urine, confusion, difficulty breathing, mental status changes and the like. At least a request for an advisory input concerning a user request for an advisory input containing certain “buzz words” may be matched to at least a specific informed advisor that such “buzz words” may be associated with. For example, at least a request for an advisory input containing words such as “diet, nutrition, calorie, nourishment, carbohydrate, dietary, portion, and whole-grain” may be matched to a nutrition professional. In yet another non-limiting example, words such as “athlete, dancing, endurance, fitness, gym, jogging, ice-skating, warm-up, workout, Pilates, towing, running, stretching, and sit-ups” may be matched to a fitness professional. Selecting at least an informed advisor as a function of the at least a request for an advisory input may include linking the at least a diagnostic output to the at least a selected informed advisor. Linking may include selecting at least an informed advisor as a function of the at least a diagnostic output. Linking may be learned using a machine learning process as described above. For example, at least a diagnostic output such as cancer may be linked to at least an informed advisor such as family and friends. In yet another non-limiting example, at least a diagnostic output such as arthritis may be linked to at least an informed advisor such as a fitness professional. Linking may include a plurality of informed advisors. For example, at least a diagnostic output such as coronary heart disease may be linked to a plurality of informed advisors such as functional medicine professionals, nutrition professionals, fitness professionals, spirituality professionals, and the like. Selection of an informed advisor may also be done based on user preference, diagnostic output, and/or information contained within prognostic support network 1608 as described above in more detail above in reference to FIG. 16.

With continued reference to FIG. 20, at least an advisor module operating on at least a server transmits the at least an advisor output to the at least a selected informed advisor. In an embodiment, transmission may include transmitting the at least an advisor output to a user client device and/or advisor client device. Transmission may include transmitting the at least an advisor output to a client-interface module. Transmission may be implemented, without limitation, as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-19.

Referring now to FIG. 21, an exemplary embodiment of advisory database 1628 is illustrated. One or more database tables in advisory database 1628 may link to data surrounding an informed advisor. Advisory database 1628 may include one or more database tables categorized by expertise of informed advisor. One or more database tables in advisory database 1628 may include, without limitation, an artificial intelligence informed advisors table 2104, which may contain any and all information pertaining to artificial intelligence informed advisors. One or more database tables in advisory database 1628 may include, without limitation, a spiritual professional informed advisors table 2108, which may contain any and all information pertaining to spiritual professional informed advisors. Spiritual professional informed advisors may include spiritual professionals who may participate in cultivating spirituality through exercise of practices such as prayer, meditation, breath work, energy work, and the like. One or more database tables in advisory database 1628 may include, without limitation, a nutrition professional informed advisors table 2112, which may include any and all information pertaining to nutritional informed advisors. Nutritional informed advisors may include dieticians, chefs, and nutritionists who may offer expertise around a user's diet and nutrition state and supplementation. One or more database tables in advisory database 1628 may include, without limitation a fitness professional informed advisors table 2116, which may include any and all information pertaining to fitness professional informed advisors. Fitness professional informed advisors may examine the fitness state of a user and may include personal trainers, coaches, group exercise instructors, and the like. One or more database tables in advisory database 1628 may include, without limitation a functional medicine informed advisors table 2120, which may include any and all information pertaining to functional medicine informed advisors. Functional medicine informed advisors may include doctors, nurses, physician assistants, nurse practitioners and other members of the health care team. One or more database tables in advisory database 1628 may include, without limitation a friends and family informed advisors table 2124, which may include any and all information pertaining to friends and family informed advisors. Friends and family informed advisors may include friends and family members of a user who may create a positive community of support for a user. One or more database tables in advisory database 1628 may include, without limitation an electronic behavior coach informed advisor table 2128, which may include any and all information pertaining to electronic behavior coach informed advisors. Electronic behavior coach informed advisors may assist a user in achieving certain results such as modifying behaviors to achieve a result such as assisting in addition recovery and/or changing a user's eating habits to lose weight. One or more database tables in advisory database 1628 may include without limitation a miscellaneous informed advisor table 2132, which may include any and all information pertaining to miscellaneous informed advisors. Miscellaneous informed advisors may include any informed advisors who do not fit into one of the categories such as for example insurance coverage informed advisors. Miscellaneous informed advisor table 2132 may also contain miscellaneous information pertaining to informed advisors such as a user's preference for informed advisors in a certain geographical location and/or other preferences for informed advisors.

Referring now to FIG. 22, system 100 may include an influencer module 2200 operating on the at least a server 104. Influencer module 2200 may include any suitable hardware or software module. Influencer module 2200 may be designed and configured to receive the at least a request for a user behavior modification, generate at least a request for an influencer as a function of the at least a request for a user behavior modification and transmit the at least a request for an influencer to a user client device. At least a request for an influencer as used herein is a request for an influencer to join a user's inner support circle to provide encouragement, support, mentorship, guidance, and/or services to a user in response to user's desired behavior modification. An influencer as used herein includes any individual that a user accepts to be a part of user's inner support circle to provide encouragement, support, mentorship, guidance, and/or services to a user in response to user's desired behavior modification. An influencer may include an informed advisor, user's family, user's friends, members of the community, members of support groups, and/or coaches. An influencer may include for example, a nutritionist, a health coach, an addiction specialist, a close family friend, a fellow member at user's church, a fellow member of a 12-step program such as alcoholics anonymous and/or narcotics anonymous and the like.

With continued reference to FIG. 22, influencer module 2200 generates at least a request for an influencer as a function of the at least a request for a behavior modification. Influencer module 2200 may generate at least a request for a behavior modification by linking the at least a request for a behavior modification through a machine-learning process to at least a request for an influencer as described in more detail below in FIG. 24. For example, influencer module 2200 may link at least a request for a behavior modification such as a desire to lose weight to at least a request for an influencer that may include a nutritionist, dietician, health coach, and the like. In yet another non-limiting example, influencer module 2200 may link at least a request for a behavior modification such as a desire for a user to control intermittent explosive disorder to at least a request for an influencer that may include a psychiatrist, behavioral therapist, and/or a psychologist. Influencer module 2200 may generate the at least a request for an influencer as a function of a user requested category of at least an influencer. Category may include a class of individuals having shared characteristics. Category may include shared characteristics as to function that at least an influencer may perform. For example, a user may request a category of at least an influencer such as a functional medicine doctor, a family member, a friend, a member of the community and the like. Category of at least an influencer may be categorized into sub-categories. For example, a category such as a functional medicine doctors may include primary care functional medicine doctors, gastrointestinal functional medicine doctors, psychiatric functional medicine doctors, dermatology functional medicine doctors and the like. In yet another non-limiting example, a category such as friends may be categorized into sub-categories which may include friends from childhood, friends from college, friends from work, friends from health club, friends from an activity such as an organized sport, friends from a support group, friends from a neighborhood and the like. Influencer module 2200 may generate the at least a request for an influence as a function of a user preference. User preference may include a criterion of at least an influence that a user may desire. User may have a preference as to geographical location of at least an influencer. For example, a user who resides in San Francisco, Calif. may request a preference at least an influencer who is located in San Francisco county and San Mateo county but not in Santa Clara county or Napa county. User may have a preference as to at least an influencer that a user has past interactions with. For example, a user who may have worked with a certain nutritionist and/or health coach and a user may have a preference to work with a particular influencer again. User may have a preference as to gender of at least an influencer. For example, a female user may have a preference for a female functional medicine doctor. Influencer module 2200 may generate at least a request for an influencer as a function of a quality of at least an influencer. A quality as used herein includes an attribute or characteristic exhibited by at least an influencer. Qualities may include for example positive qualities that a user may desire in an influencer such as trustworthiness, vigilance and/or watchfulness, wisdom, loyalty, unconditional love, supportiveness, reliability, self-control, rejecting evil, kindness, truthfulness, ability to give good advice, positive influence, cooperative, attitude of service, knowledge about user, family commitment, high standards, share burdens, encouraging user to trust in a higher power, humility, forgiveness, peacefulness, acceptance, and/or generosity. Qualities may include for example negative qualities that a user seeks to avoid in an influencer such as drunkenness, filthy language, corruption, malice, deceit, hatred, jealousy, greed, and the like. For example, a user who is experiencing opioid addictions may generate at least a request for an influencer who portrays qualities such as unconditional love, positive influence, and encouraging user to trust in a higher power while avoiding at least an influencer who exhibits qualities such as negativity, deceit, and drunkenness. In yet another non-limiting example, a user who is obese and desires to lose weight may generate at least a request for an influencer who portrays qualities such as supportiveness and reliability and who does not portray qualities such as greed or lack of self-control.

With continued reference to FIG. 22, qualities as to an influencer may be collected and stored in a database within system 100. Qualities of at least an influencer may be self-reported, such as a when at least an influencer may enter information about himself or herself into system 100. For example, at least an influencer who has been faithful to one's spouse may self-report a quality such as faithfulness and joy. At least an influencer who has had affairs and sexual impurity may self-report a quality such as sexual immorality. In an embodiment, at least an influencer may self-report a quality on a scale of how often they may exhibit a certain quality. For example, a scale may include categories describing how often an influencer exhibits a quality such as a category for never for when an influencer never exhibits a quality, a category such as rarely when an influencer may infrequently exhibit a quality, a category such as sometimes when an influencer may exhibit a quality more frequency, a category such as frequently when an influencer is repeatedly exhibiting a quality, and a category such as always when an influencer is consistently exhibiting a quality. In an embodiment, qualities may be reported about an influencer by an influencer's network which may include an influencer's family, friends, acquaintances, and other users an influencer has provided support to. For example, a user that an influencer helped achieve a behavior modification such as recovering from alcohol addiction may rate provide input as to qualities that influencer may hold. In such an instance, user may report to system 100 that influencer exhibited qualities such as patience, kindness, and self-control. Qualities as reported by an influencer's network may also be ranked on a scale as described above as to how often an influencer exhibits a quality. Qualities of at least an influencer may also be obtained and stored in a database from an influencer's self-reflection of qualities influencer may exhibit. Qualities stored in a database as to an influencer may be aggregated together when results are received from different evaluators. Qualities stored in a database may be frequently updated to reflect different qualities an influencer may exhibit, and/or different frequencies that an influencer may exhibit a quality. For example, an influencer who sometimes exhibits joy, may frequently experience joy after a personal achievement such as graduation from culinary school and landing a dream job and as such database may be updated to reflect this. In yet another non-limiting example, an influencer who frequently exhibits drunkenness and then enters rehab and recovers may have database updated to reflect that influencer never experiences drunkenness.

With continued reference to FIG. 22, influencer module 2200 receives the at least a request for a behavior modification. Influencer module 2200 may receive a user requested category of behavior change from a user client device and/or advisory client device as described in more detail below. In an embodiment, influencer module 2200 may receive the at least a request for a behavior modification from a user client device. User client device 124 may include any of the user client devices as described in more detail above. In an embodiment, user may generate at least a request for a behavior modification from user client device 124. In an embodiment, influencer module 2200 may receive the at least a request for a behavior modification from an advisory client device. Advisory client device 188 may include any of the advisory client devices as described in more detail above. Advisory client device 188 may include any device suitable for a user as a user client device. In an embodiment, advisory client device 188 may be operated by an informed advisor as described in more detail above. For example, at least an advisor client device may be output to user client device 124. In yet another non-limiting example, an informed advisor such as a yoga instructor may generate at least a request for a behavior modification such as stress reduction for a user from advisor client device.

In an embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 22, server 104 and/or one or more modules operating thereon may match one or more sets of user attributes to one or more sets of influencer attributes. One or more sets of user attributes may include, without limitation, a set of attributes associated with a user's belief system, such as religious rules, religious beliefs, proscriptions from engaging in particular activities, therapies, treatments, or the like. A set of attributes may include a plurality of negative behavioral propensities of a user and/or elements thereof, as described for instance in U.S. Nonprovisional patent Ser. No. 16/673,673, filed Nov. 4, 2019, and entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CLASSIFYING MEDIA ACCORDING TO USER NEGATIVE PROPENSITIES,” the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference. A set of attributes may include, without limitation, a set of user needs, such as prognostic and/or ameliorative labels as described above.

Further referring to FIG. 22, server and/or one or more modules thereon may compare such sets of user attributes to sets of influencer attributes; server and/or one or more modules thereon may select an influencer by matching the set of user attributes to a set of influencer attributes of the sets of influencer attributes. Sets of influencer attributes may include, without limitation, a set of attributes associated with a belief system of an influencer, which may be implemented as described above for a set of attributes associated with a belief system of a user. A set of influencer attributes may include a set of negative qualities of an influencer. A set of influencer attributes may include a set of positive qualities of an influencer. A set of influencer attributes may describe attributes associated with a belief system of an influencer. A set of influencer attributes may describe attributes associated with methods and/or advice currently or previously used by an influencer. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various other attribute sets of influencer attributes and/or user attributes that may be assembled and/or used as described in this disclosure. Each of the above-described attributes may be entered and/or reported by user, influencer, and/or other persons, as consistent with methods described above.

Still referring to FIG. 22, server 104 and/or a module thereon may generate a classifier and/or perform one or more classification algorithms to match a set of user attributes to a set of influencer attributes. A “classifier,” as used in this disclosure is a machine-learning model, such as a mathematical model, neural net, or program generated by a machine learning algorithm known as a “classification algorithm,” as described in further detail below, that sorts inputs into categories or bins of data, outputting the categories or bins of data and/or labels associated therewith. Classification may be performed using, without limitation, linear classifiers such as without limitation logistic regression and/or naive Bayes classifiers, nearest neighbor classifiers such as k-nearest neighbors classifiers, support vector machines, least squares support vector machines, fisher's linear discriminant, quadratic classifiers, decision trees, boosted trees, random forest classifiers, learning vector quantization, and/or neural network-based classifiers.

With continued reference to FIG. 22, and as a non-limiting example, server 104 may be configured perform classification using a K-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm. A “K-nearest neighbors algorithm” as used in this disclosure, includes a classification method that utilizes feature similarity to analyze how closely out-of-sample—features resemble training data to classify input data to one or more clusters and/or categories of features as represented in training data; this may be performed by representing both training data and input data in vector forms, and using one or more measures of vector similarity to identify classifications within training data, and to determine a classification of input data. K-nearest neighbors algorithm may include specifying a K-value, or a number directing the classifier to select the k most similar entries training data to a given sample, determining the most common classifier of the entries in the database, and classifying the known sample; this may be performed recursively and/or iteratively to generate a classifier that may be used to classify input data as further samples. For instance, an initial set of samples may be performed to cover an initial heuristic and/or “first guess” at an output and/or relationship, which may be seeded, without limitation, using expert input received according to any process as described herein. As a non-limiting example, an initial heuristic may include a ranking of associations between inputs and elements of training data. Heuristic may include selecting some number of highest-ranking associations and/or training data elements.

With continued reference to FIG. 22, generating k-nearest neighbors algorithm may generate a first vector output containing a data entry cluster, generating a second vector output containing an input data, and calculate the distance between the first vector output and the second vector output using any suitable norm such as cosine similarity, Euclidean distance measurement, or the like. Each vector output may be represented, without limitation, as an n-tuple of values, where n is at least two values; values may correspond to any user attribute set and/or influencer attribute set as described above. Each value of n-tuple of values may represent a measurement or other quantitative value associated with a given category of data, or attribute, examples of which are provided in further detail below; a vector may be represented, without limitation, in n-dimensional space using an axis per category of value represented in n-tuple of values, such that a vector has a geometric direction characterizing the relative quantities of attributes in the n-tuple as compared to each other. Two vectors may be considered equivalent where their directions, and/or the relative quantities of values within each vector as compared to each other, are the same; thus, as a non-limiting example, a vector represented as [5, 10, 15] may be treated as equivalent, for purposes of this disclosure, as a vector represented as [1, 2, 3]. Vectors may be more similar where their directions are more similar, and more different where their directions are more divergent; however, vector similarity may alternatively or additionally be determined using averages of similarities between like attributes, or any other measure of similarity suitable for any n-tuple of values, or aggregation of numerical similarity measures for the purposes of loss functions as described in further detail below. Any vectors as described herein may be scaled, such that each vector represents each attribute along an equivalent scale of values. Each vector may be “normalized,” or divided by a “length” attribute, such as a length attribute 1 as derived using a Pythagorean norm: l=√{square root over (Σ_(i=0) ^(n)a_(i) ²)}, where a_(i) is attribute number i of the vector. Scaling and/or normalization may function to make vector comparison independent of absolute quantities of attributes, while preserving any dependency on similarity of attributes; this may, for instance, be advantageous where cases represented in training data are represented by different quantities of samples, which may result in proportionally equivalent vectors with divergent values. As a non-limiting example, K-nearest neighbors algorithm may be configured to classify an input vector including a plurality of user-entered words and/or phrases, a plurality of attributes of a media item, such as spoken or written text, objects depicted in images, metadata, or the like, to clusters representing themes.

Still referring to FIG. 22, classification algorithms and/or classifiers may be trained using a plurality of users' attribute sets and/or a plurality of influencers' attribute sets; such data may be pre-processed, for instance using one or more unsupervised machine-learning processes, to identify clusters of attribute sets and generate classification labels corresponding thereto; a user and/or influencer attribute set may then be classified to a label, where multiple classifiers may be used to classify according to different categories of attributes. Alternatively or additionally, users and/or expert user entries as described above may be used to identify and/or enter data useable for training, for instance by identifying negative qualities that tend to exacerbate negative behavioral propensities, positive qualities that help to alleviate negative behavioral propensities, beliefs such as religious and/or ethical beliefs that are similar and/or aligned, or the like.

For instance, a set of problematic behavior attributes of a user may be classified to a label, and a set of negative qualities of an influencer may be classified to the same label; this may indicate that the influencer may be a poor match for the user, as the influencer may tend to exacerbate negative behavioral traits of the user. As another example, a set of problematic behavior attributes of a user may be classified to a label, and a set of positive qualities of an influencer may be classified to the same label, which may indicate that the influencer may be a good match for the user, as the influencer may possess qualities highly likely to be useful in helping the user to overcome the negative behavioral propensities; attribute sets and/or training data may be prepared in this case such that measures of proximity as described above indicate degrees to which qualities are effective for and/or useful in alleviation of negative behavioral propensities. As a further example, a set of beliefs of a user may be classified to a label, and a set of beliefs of an influencer may be classified to the same label; this may indicate that the influencer is likely to share spiritual and/or ethical beliefs of a user, which may indicate that the influencer is a good match. As an additional example, a set of beliefs of a user may be classified to a label, and a set of methods or previously produced advice of an influencer may be classified to the same label; this may indicate that the influencer is likely to provide advice and/or use methods that are consistent with spiritual and/or ethical beliefs of a user, which may indicate that the influencer is a good match.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 22, server 104 and/or one or more modules thereon may use output of one or more classifiers to identify influencers that are good matches for a user and/or influencers that are poor matches for a user. For instance, classification outputs indicating that an influencer's negative qualities make the influencer a poor match for the user may be used by server 104 to eliminate that influencer from recommendations to be transmitted to the user. Classification outputs indicating that the influencer is suitable for a user may be used by server 104 to rank the influencer against other influencers; higher-ranking influencers may be presented to the user. Degrees of proximity, as described above, of influencer attribute sets to user attribute sets may be converted to numerical scores, such that an influencer with a higher overall numerical score may be ranked higher than an influencer with a lower overall numerical score; negative associations, such as associations between problematic behaviors and negative qualities may be used to reduce an overall score, for instance via subtraction. Alternative and/or additional processes may be used to determine a degree of suitability of an influencer to a user as described above; any other machine-learning process as described above may alternatively or additionally be used to identify an influencer that is suitable for a user, such as a score-generation machine-learning model that generates an influencer suitability score using any or all data described herein.

Further referring to FIG. 22, influencer module 2200 may include a user communication learner 1800. User communication learner 1800 may include any form of machine-learning learner as described above, implementing any form of language processing and/or machine learning. For example, user communication learner 1800 may utilize language processing module 216 and machine-learning algorithms to correlate inputs and outputs as described below in more detail in FIG. 24. For example, inputs corresponding to behavior modifications may be correlated to outputs that include at least a request for an influencer. For example, language processing module 216 may correlate behavior modification inputs such as addiction to at least a request for an influencer outputs such as a therapist and/or friend from a 12-step program. In yet another non-limiting example, language processing module 216 may correlate behavior modification inputs such as stress reduction to at least a request for an influencer output such as a yoga instructor or fellow yogi. Influencer module 2200 may receive at least a request for a behavior modification from user client device 124 and/or advisory client device 188. In an embodiment, influencer module 2200 may transmit the at least a request for an influencer to client-interface module. Client-interface module may transmit the at least a request for an influencer to client device 180.

With continued reference to FIG. 22, influencer module 2200 may include an influencer initiator 2204. Influencer initiator 2204 may be designed and configured to generate at least a request for an influencer as a function of the at least a request for a behavior modification. Influencer initiator may consult influencer database 2208 when generating at least a request for an influencer as described in more detail below in reference to FIG. 23. Influencer initiator 2204 may generate at least a request for an influencer as a function of a user requested information. For example, user may request a specific category of at least an influencer such as a friend, family, functional medicine influencers and the like. In an embodiment, category of at least an influencer may include any of the categories of influencers in influencer database 2208. This may include for example, family influencers, spiritual influencers, nutrition influencers, fitness influencers, functional medicine influencers, friend influencers, community influencers, and miscellaneous influencers. In an embodiment, influencers may include any of the informed advisors categorized in advisory database 1628 as described below in more detail in reference to FIG. 23. Influencer initiator 2204 may generate at least a request for an influencer as a function of a user preference of influencer. For example, a user may prefer at least an influencer to be located in a certain geographical area, to be of a certain gender, age, and/or to be selected because of a previous relationship and/or experience with at least an influencer. Influencer initiator 2204 may generate at least a request for an influencer as a function of a quality of an influencer. Quality of an influencer may include any of the qualities as described above in reference to FIG. 1.

Referring now to FIG. 23, an exemplary embodiment 2300 of influencer database 2208 is illustrated. Influencer database 2208 may include on or more entries listing labels associated with one or more influences. Linking may be performed by reference to historical data concerning influencers such as previous encounters and/or interactions with specific influences. One or more database tables may be linked to one another by, for instance, common column values. Influencers may include any of the influencers as described above in reference to FIG. 1. Influencers may interact with one another and may aid user together in interaction with system 100. Influencers may provide output to user client device 124 and/or advisor client device. Influencers may work together to create an inner support circle to provide encouragement, support, mentorship, guidance, and/or services to a user in response to user's desired behavior modification. For example, an influencer such as a nutrition professional may provide encouragement to a user to aid a user in achieving weight loss. In yet another non-limiting example, an influencer such as a member of user's community who participates in a 12-step program such as alcoholics anonymous may provide support to a user to attend weekly alcoholics anonymous meetings when user expresses a desire to quit drinking and achieve sobriety. In such an instance, user's inner support system may consist of other influencers who may provide other forms of support to user. For example, user's sister may be an influencer who may provide encouragement to user to quit drinking by driving user to twice weekly alcoholics anonymous meetings. Influencers may be selected based on input received from a user such as user's preference for an influencer in a certain geographical area where user may live or work as well as qualities a user may aspire for an influencer to possess as described in more detail above. In an embodiment, user's desired behavior modification may be linked to a maximum number of influencers that may create user's inner circle. For example, at least a behavior modification such as opioid addiction may be linked to a maximum of ten to twelve influencers while at least a behavior modification such as a user's desire to avoid filthy language may be linked to a maximum of six to eight influencers.

With continued reference to FIG. 23, influencer database 2208 includes family influencers 2304. Family influencers 2304 may include any family member of user who may provide encouragement, support, mentorship, guidance, and/or services to a user in response to user's desired behavior modification. Family influencers 2304 may include influencers who are descendants of a common ancestor as user. This may include for example immediate family members such as parents, siblings such as brothers and sisters, as well as immediate family such as aunts, uncles, cousins, grandparents, and the like. Family influencers 2304 may include adopted family members such as when a child is adopted after being given up by birth parents or when a user has close friends who user considers to be part of user's family. For example, an adult aged user who may be orphaned after the death of both parents may consider a close friend's family to be user's adopted family if user attends holidays such as Thanksgiving or Christmas with close friend's family. Influencer database 2208 includes spiritual influencers 2308. Spiritual influencers 2308 may include influencers specializing in the conscious mind body connection who may provide encouragement, support, mentorship, guidance, and/or services to a user in response to user's desired behavior modification. Spiritual influencers 2308 may include for example, religious leaders such as a pastor at a church, a rabbi at a synagogue, a member of the Buddhist community, an Inman and the like.

With continued reference to FIG. 23, influencer database 2208 includes nutrition influencers 2312. Nutrition influencers 2312 may include influencers specializing in diet, nutrition, and/or supplementation who may provide encouragement, support, mentorship, guidance, and/or services to a user in response to user's desired behavior modification. Nutrition influencers 2312 may include nutritionists, dieticians, chefs, certified nutrition specialist, nutrition coaches, and/or holistic health coaches. Nutrition influencers 2312 may include for example, a registered dietician who may aid a user with a behavior modification such as weight loss to create customized meal plans to aid user in losing two pounds each week. Influencer database 2208 includes fitness influencers 2316. Fitness influencers 2316 may include influencers specializing in physical activities such as sports, exercise, movement, and/or activities of daily life who may provide encouragement, support, mentorship, guidance, and/or services to a user in response to user's desired behavior modification. Fitness influencers 2316 may include for example, personal trainers, sports coaches, yoga instructors, group exercise instructors, athletic trainers, physical therapists, fitness instructors, authors of fitness instruction books or manuals, experts in kinesiology, and/or experts skilled in anatomy and/or biomechanics. For example, a fitness influencer such as a physical therapist may provide guidance to a user with a desired behavior modification to recover from an injury such as planter fasciitis and/or a bone bruise.

With continued reference to FIG. 23, influencer database 2208 includes functional medicine influencers 2320. Functional medicine influencers 2320 may include influencers specializing in the practice of functional medicine who may provide encouragement, support, mentorship, guidance, and/or services to a user in response to user's desired behavior modification. Function medicine may include any of the services as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-17. Functional medicine influencers 2320 may include for example, medical doctors, osteopathic medicine doctors, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, chiropractic doctors, naturopathic doctors, pharmacists, nurses, licensed practical nurses, psychologists, respiratory therapists, social workers, x-ray technicians, pharmacy technicians, mental health professionals, medical assistants, and the like. For example, a functional medicine influencer such as a physician assistant may provide mentorship to a user with a behavioral modification that includes heroin addiction as the user initially detoxes off heroin. Influencer database 2208 includes friend influencers 2324. Friend influencers 2324 may include friends of user who may provide encouragement, support, mentorship, guidance, and/or services to a user in response to user's desired behavior modification. Friends may include a person whom a user knows and with whom a user has a bond of mutual affection. Friends may include persons from different aspects of a user's life such as friends from user's work, friends from user's childhood, friends from user's college, friends from user's graduate school, friends from user's neighborhoods, friends from user's spiritual community, friends from user's organized sports, friends from user's knitting circle and the like. For example, a friend of user from childhood may provide support and encouragement for a user with a behavior modification such as a desire to recover from anorexia that user has been diagnosed with since puberty. Influencer database 2208 includes community influencers 2328. Community influencers 2328 may include individuals in user's community who may provide encouragement, support, mentorship, guidance, and/or services to a user in response to user's desired behavior modification. Community may include a group of people having a shared characteristic. Shared characteristic may include individuals with a shared religious view, individuals with a shared political view, individuals who participate in a shared activity such as an organized sport, dinner club, knitting circle, book club, and the like. Community influencers 2328 may include individuals who have a shared characteristic with user. For example, a community influencer such as an individual who belongs to user's tennis club may provide support for user with a behavior modification to become more physically fit. In yet another non-limiting example, a community influencer such as an individual who patriciates in a cooking class with user may provide encouragement for user with a behavior modification to cook more meals at home from scratch instead of relying on take out. Influencer database 2208 may include miscellaneous influencers 2332. Miscellaneous influencers 2332 may include influencers who may provide encouragement, support, mentorship, guidance, and/or services to a user in response to user's desired behavior modification pertaining to any other applicable industry. Influencer database 2208 may include advisory database 1628 which may include any categories of informed advisors as described in more detail above in FIGS. 15-17. Advisory database 1628 may include informed advisors such as artificial intelligence informed advisors, spiritual professional informed advisors, nutrition professional informed advisors, fitness professional informed advisors, functional medicine informed advisors, friends and family informed advisors, electronic behavior coach informed advisors, and miscellaneous informed advisors.

Referring now to FIG. 24, an exemplary embodiment of a method 2400 of behavior modification using artificial intelligence is illustrated. At step 2405 the at least a server receives at least a biological extraction from a user. This may be implemented, without limitation, as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-20. Biological extraction may include any extraction as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-20. Receiving at least a biological extraction of a user may include receiving a first training data set including a plurality of first data entries, each first data entry of the plurality of first data entries including at least an element of physiological state data and at least a correlated first prognostic label. This may be implemented, without limitation, as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-20. Receiving at least a biological extraction of a user may include receiving a second training data set including a plurality of second data entries, each second data entry of the plurality of second data entries including at least a second prognostic label at least a correlated ameliorative process label. This may be implemented, without limitation, as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-20.

With continued reference to FIG. 24, at step 2410 the at least a server generates a diagnostic output based on the at least a biological extraction. The diagnostic output includes at least an ameliorative process label. This may be implemented, without limitation, as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-20. Ameliorative process label may include any ameliorative process label as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-20.

With continued reference to FIG. 24, at step 2415 the at least a server generates at least a request for a behavior modification as a function of the at least an ameliorative process label. In yet another example, machine-learning modules may create correlations relating an ameliorative process label such as insulin resistance to at least a request for a behavior modification such as weight loss. Machine-learning models may group certain ameliorative process labels to generate at least a request for a behavior modification. For example, ameliorative process labels that includes treatments for addiction such as prescription medications including SUBOXONE as produced by Reckitt Benckiser of Slough, United Kingdom and ANTABUSE as produced by Odyssey Pharmaceuticals of East Hanover, N.J. may be grouped to generate at least a request for a behavior modification such as addiction. In yet another non-limiting example, ameliorative process label that includes initiating an exercise regimen or increasing one's time for fitness may be grouped to generate at least a request for a behavior modification such as reduced television and screen time. Machine-learning models may group certain prognostic labels which may be utilized to generate at least an ameliorative process label. For example, prognostic labels relating to metabolic disorders such as obesity, metabolic syndrome, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and type 2 diabetes mellitus may be grouped to generate at least an ameliorative process label that includes initiation or expansion of a fitness regimen. Ameliorative process label such as initiation or expansion of a fitness regimen may be linked through machine-learning models to generate at least a request for a behavior modification that includes scheduling at least three fitness sessions each week. In yet another non-limiting example, prognostic labels relating to infidelity such as opportunistic infidelity, obligatory infidelity, romantic infidelity, conflicted romantic infidelity, and commemorative infidelity may be grouped to generate at least an ameliorative process label that includes couples' therapy with a licensed therapist. Ameliorative process label that includes couples' therapy with a licensed therapist may be linked to generate at least a request for a behavior modification that includes remaining faithful to one's spouse. Machine-learning models may be utilized so that an ameliorative process label may generate at least a request for a behavior modification that may occur at some point in the future. For example, an ameliorative process label that includes a treatment for an addiction such as gambling, drugs, alcohol, and/or shopping may be linked to at least a behavior request that includes attending twelve step programs and seeking counseling for an addition. In such an instance, a user may refuse to engage in treatment or may have a set-back and may not be ready to admit that user has a problem and needs to seek necessary treatment for the problem. At least a behavior modification may indicate that once user accepts user's circumstance and agrees to treatment behavior modification may occur at some point in the future. Generating at least a request for a behavior modification may include generating at least a request for a behavior modification as a function of a user requested category of behavior change. Category of behavioral change may include a grouping of behavioral modifications having particular shared characteristics as described in more detail above in reference to FIG. 1. For example, a user may generate at least a request for a behavior modification that may indicate a desire to overcome an addiction such an alcohol addiction. In yet another non-limiting example, user may generate at least a request for a behavior modification that may indicate a desire to manage a psychiatric disorder. In an embodiment, user requested category may include sub-categories that provide further details and descriptions as to user's desired behavioral modification. For example, a user who seeks to recover from an addiction may generate at least a behavior modification that indicates a desire to do so, which may include a sub-category that indicates the specific type of addiction user seeks to recover from such as gambling. In yet another non-limiting example, a user who seeks to recover from a psychiatric disorder may generate at least a behavior modification that indicate a desired to do so, which may include a sub-category that indicates the specific psychiatric disorder user seeks to recover from such as bipolar disorder.

With continued reference to FIG. 24, at step 2420 influencer module operating on the at least a server receives the at least a request for a behavior modification. Influencer module may receive at least a request for a behavior modification from diagnostic engine operating on the at least a server. This may be implemented, without limitation, as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-20. Influencer module may receive at least a request for a behavior modification from a user client device. In an embodiment, user may utilize different diagnostic tools to evaluate user's life and generate at least a request for a behavior modification from a user client device. For example, a user may evaluate good and evil forces in user's life and critique how user can aspire to live user's best life. For example, a user who exhibits a family commitment and remains reliable may also have a short temper and lash out at user's family. In such an instance, user may seek to modify user's short temper and may generate at least a request for a behavior modification from user's client device. In yet another non-limiting example, user may be addicted to pornography and may seek to avoid and reject such evil. In such an instance, user may generate at least a behavior request to overcome user's pornography addiction. Influencer module may receive at least a request for a behavior modification from an advisory client device. Advisory client device may be operated by at least an informed advisor as described above in more detail in reference to FIGS. 1-20. Informed advisor may include any of the informed advisors as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-20. In an embodiment, an informed advisor may generate at least a request for a behavior modification after an interaction such as a consultation or meeting with a user. For example, an informed advisor such as a functional gastroenterologist may perform an endoscopy on a user who is a chronic smoker after user complains of acid reflux, indigestion, throat irritation, chronic cough and coughing up blood. In such an instance, functional gastroenterologist may notice altered changes to user's esophagus during endoscopy and may diagnose user with Barrett's esophagus. Functional gastroenterologist may generate at least a request for a behavior modification for user to stop smoking using advisory client device. In yet another non-limiting example, a spiritual professional informed advisor such as a priest at a church may generate at least a behavior modification using advisory client device for a user after a user consults with the priest as to overcome user's gambling addiction. In yet another non-limiting example, a nutrition professional informed advisor such as a dietician may generate at least a request for a behavior modification using advisor client device for user to cook at least 3 meals each week at home after user complains to dietician about eating out frequently during the week.

With continued reference to FIG. 24, at step 2425 influencer module operating on the at least a server generates at least a request for an influencer as a function of the at least a request for a behavior modification. Generating at least a request for an influencer as a function of the at least a request for a behavior modification may include evaluating the at least a request for a behavior modification. Language processing module 216 may evaluate at least a request for a behavior modification and may extract one or more words that may be linked to at least a request for an influencer. For example, at least a request for a behavior modification that includes the world “addiction” may generate at least a request for an influencer that includes a psychiatrist. In yet another non-limiting example, at least a request for a behavior modification that includes “weight loss” may generate at least a request for an influencer that includes a dietician. Generating at least a request for an influencer may be done by using a machine-learning model generate link at least a request for a behavior modification to at least a request for an influencer. Machine-learning model may use models to create correlations relating at least a request for a behavior modification such as infidelity to at least a request for an influencer that includes a psychologist. Machine-learning models may group certain behavior modification to generate at least a request for an influencer. For example, at least a request for a behavior modification that includes any type of addiction such as alcohol, drugs, gambling, shopping, pornography and the like may be linked to at least a request for an influencer that includes a behavior coach who may be able to help user overcome user's addiction. In yet another non-limiting example, at least a request for a behavior modification that includes a mental health disorder such as clinical depression, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), schizophrenia, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), and/or explosive personality disorder may be linked to at least a request for an influencer such as a functional medicine doctor. In an embodiment, at least a request for a behavior modification may be linked to a desired quality displayed by at least an influencer. For example, at least a request for a behavior modification such as infidelity may be linked to at least an influencer who displays qualities such as family commitment, forgiveness, and wisdom. In yet another non-limiting example, at least a request for a behavior modification such as a reduced frequency of panic attacks may be linked to at least an influencer who displays qualities such as peacefulness, supportiveness, and reliability. In an embodiment, at least a request for a behavior modification may be linked to a quality that is undesirable and should not be displayed by at least an influencer. For example, at least a request for a behavior modification such as addiction may be linked to undesirable qualities such as drunkenness, corruption, and dishonesty that should not be displayed by at least an influencer to help a user recover from addiction. In yet another non-limiting example, at least a request for a behavior modification such as implementing a meditation practice to reduce stress may be linked to undesirable qualities such as anger, rage, and jealousy that should not be displayed by at least an influencer to help a user embrace a more peaceful lifestyle.

With continued reference to FIG. 24, generating at least a request for an influencer may be done utilizing user supplied inputs. In an embodiment, generating at least a request for an influencer may be done as a function of a user-requested category of at least an influencer. For example, user who is experiencing addiction may request at least an influencer such as a friend to support user in user' recovery. In yet another non-limiting example, user who is experiencing obsessive compulsive disorder may request at least an influencer such as a functional medicine doctor. In an embodiment, generating at least a request for an influencer may be done as a function of a user preference, which may include criteria that a user may prefer in at least an influencer as described in more detail above in reference to FIG. 1. In an embodiment, a user may prefer at least an influencer within a certain geographical distance of where a user may live or work. For example, a user who lives in Jacksonville, Fla. may prefer at least an influencer who resides in northern Florida and southern Georgia, while a user who lives in Anchorage, Ak. may prefer at least an influencer who resides in Anchorage, Palmer, Wasilla, and Willow Ak. In an embodiment, a user may prefer at least an influencer who is of a certain age, and sex. For example, a male user who is twenty-five may prefer at least an influencer who is under thirty-five while a female user who is sixty-seven may prefer at least an influencer who is female who is over fifty years old. In an embodiment, a user may specify at least an influencer who user has had past interactions and/or experiences with. For example, a user with an addiction problem may prefer a functional psychologist who user has previously discussed user's addiction problem with. In yet another non-limiting example, a user may prefer at least an influencer who is a friend of user and who overcame a similar behavior modification. In yet another non-limiting example, a user with an addiction problem may have a preference as to at least an influencer that user does not want to be selected, such as an influencer who did not help user in the past or an influencer that user did not connect with and achieved very little progress. Generating at least a request for an influencer may be done as a function of a user input as to quality of an influencer that a user may prefer as described above in more detail in reference to FIG. 1. For example, a user may prefer at least an influencer who exhibits shared qualities of user such as faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. In yet another non-limiting example, a user with at least a request for a behavior modification such as weight loss may prefer at least an influencer who exhibits qualities such as self-control and accountability, to assist user in losing weight. In such an instance, user may prefer at least an influencer to not exhibit qualities such as lack of self-control and corruption.

With continued reference to FIG. 24, at step 2430 the at least a server transmits the at least a request for an influencer to at least a client device. In an embodiment, the at least a request for an influencer may be transmitted to at least an advisor client device. Transmission may include transmitting the at least an advisor output to a client-interface module. Transmission may be implemented for example, as described above in more detail in FIG. 1. Transmission may also be implemented for example utilizing any of the methodologies as described in this disclosure.

With continued reference to FIG. 24, advisory module operating on the at least a server may receive at least a request for an advisory input. Advisory module may receive at least a request for an advisory input when consultation with at least an informed advisor may be needed, and/or when at least an informed advisor may serve as at least an influencer. Receiving at least a request for an advisory input may be implemented, without limitation, as described above in FIGS. 1-20. At least a request for an advisory input may be received from user client device 124, advisor client device, user, informed advisor, diagnostic output and/or artificial intelligence advisor 1508 as described above in more detail in FIGS. 1-20.

With continued reference to FIG. 24, advisory module may generate at least an advisory output using the at least a request for an advisory input and at least a diagnostic output. Generating an advisory output may include generating an advisor instruction set. Generating an advisor instruction set may be performed by any of the methods as described above in reference to FIG. 15. This may include for example, generating an advisory output as a function of user preference and/or information contained within advisory database 1628 as described in more detail above in FIG. 15.

With continued reference to FIG. 24, advisory module selects at least an advisor client device as a function of the at least a request for an advisory input. Selecting at least an informed advisor may include matching the at least a request for an advisory input to the at least an informed advisor. Matching may include for example matching an input to an output that constitutes a specific informed advisor. Matching may be learned using a machine learning process, for instance via general learner 1604 and/or user specific learner 1608. For example, information concerning a particular request for an advisory input may be part of a training set used to generate the matching between at least a request for an advisory input and selecting at least an informed advisor. For example, at least a request for an advisory input concerning a user with a history of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus may be matched to at least a functional medicine professional when at least a request for an advisory input describes frequent urination, extreme thirst, hyperglycemic blood sugar readings, hypoglycemic blood sugar readings, fruity-smelling breath, presence of ketones in the urine, confusion, difficulty breathing, mental status changes and the like. At least a request for an advisory input concerning a user request for an advisory input containing certain “buzz words” may be matched to at least a specific informed advisor that such “buzz words” may be associated with. For example, at least a request for an advisory input containing words such as “diet, nutrition, calorie, nourishment, carbohydrate, dietary, portion, and whole-grain” may be matched to a nutrition professional. In yet another non-limiting example, words such as “athlete, dancing, endurance, fitness, gym, jogging, ice-skating, warm-up, workout, Pilates, towing, running, stretching, and sit-ups” may be matched to a fitness professional. Selecting at least an informed advisor as a function of the at least a request for an advisory input may include linking the at least a diagnostic output to the at least a selected informed advisor. Linking may include selecting at least an informed advisor as a function of the at least a diagnostic output. Linking may be learned using a machine learning process as described above. For example, at least a diagnostic output such as cancer may be linked to at least an informed advisor such as family and friends. In yet another non-limiting example, at least a diagnostic output such as arthritis may be linked to at least an informed advisor such as a fitness professional. Linking may include a plurality of informed advisors. For example, at least a diagnostic output such as coronary heart disease may be linked to a plurality of informed advisors such as functional medicine professionals, nutrition professionals, fitness professionals, spirituality professionals, and the like. Selection of an informed advisor may also be done based on user preference, diagnostic output, and/or information contained within advisory database 1628 described above in more detail above in reference to FIGS. 15-17.

With continued reference to FIG. 24, advisory module transmits the at least an advisory output to the at least an advisor client device. In an embodiment, transmission may include transmitting the at least an advisor output to a user client device and/or advisor client device. Transmission may include transmitting the at least an advisor output to a client-interface module. Transmission may be implemented, without limitation, as described above in reference to FIGS. 1-20.

It is to be noted that any one or more of the aspects and embodiments described herein may be conveniently implemented using one or more machines (e.g., one or more computing devices that are utilized as a user computing device for an electronic document, one or more server devices, such as a document server, etc.) programmed according to the teachings of the present specification, as will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the computer art. Appropriate software coding can readily be prepared by skilled programmers based on the teachings of the present disclosure, as will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the software art. Aspects and implementations discussed above employing software and/or software modules may also include appropriate hardware for assisting in the implementation of the machine executable instructions of the software and/or software module.

Such software may be a computer program product that employs a machine-readable storage medium. A machine-readable storage medium may be any medium that is capable of storing and/or encoding a sequence of instructions for execution by a machine (e.g., a computing device) and that causes the machine to perform any one of the methodologies and/or embodiments described herein. Examples of a machine-readable storage medium include, but are not limited to, a magnetic disk, an optical disc (e.g., CD, CD-R, DVD, DVD-R, etc.), a magneto-optical disk, a read-only memory “ROM” device, a random access memory “RAM” device, a magnetic card, an optical card, a solid-state memory device, an EPROM, an EEPROM, and any combinations thereof. A machine-readable medium, as used herein, is intended to include a single medium as well as a collection of physically separate media, such as, for example, a collection of compact discs or one or more hard disk drives in combination with a computer memory. As used herein, a machine-readable storage medium does not include transitory forms of signal transmission.

Such software may also include information (e.g., data) carried as a data signal on a data carrier, such as a carrier wave. For example, machine-executable information may be included as a data-carrying signal embodied in a data carrier in which the signal encodes a sequence of instruction, or portion thereof, for execution by a machine (e.g., a computing device) and any related information (e.g., data structures and data) that causes the machine to perform any one of the methodologies and/or embodiments described herein.

Examples of a computing device include, but are not limited to, an electronic book reading device, a computer workstation, a terminal computer, a server computer, a handheld device (e.g., a tablet computer, a smartphone, etc.), a web appliance, a network router, a network switch, a network bridge, any machine capable of executing a sequence of instructions that specify an action to be taken by that machine, and any combinations thereof. In one example, a computing device may include and/or be included in a kiosk.

FIG. 25 shows a diagrammatic representation of one embodiment of a computing device in the exemplary form of a computer system 2500 within which a set of instructions for causing a control system to perform any one or more of the aspects and/or methodologies of the present disclosure may be executed. It is also contemplated that multiple computing devices may be utilized to implement a specially configured set of instructions for causing one or more of the devices to perform any one or more of the aspects and/or methodologies of the present disclosure. Computer system 2500 includes a processor 2504 and a memory 2508 that communicate with each other, and with other components, via a bus 2512. Bus 2512 may include any of several types of bus structures including, but not limited to, a memory bus, a memory controller, a peripheral bus, a local bus, and any combinations thereof, using any of a variety of bus architectures.

Memory 2508 may include various components (e.g., machine-readable media) including, but not limited to, a random-access memory component, a read only component, and any combinations thereof. In one example, a basic input/output system 2516 (BIOS), including basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within computer system 2500, such as during start-up, may be stored in memory 2508. Memory 2508 may also include (e.g., stored on one or more machine-readable media) instructions (e.g., software) 2520 embodying any one or more of the aspects and/or methodologies of the present disclosure. In another example, memory 2508 may further include any number of program modules including, but not limited to, an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, program data, and any combinations thereof.

Computer system 2500 may also include a storage device 2524. Examples of a storage device (e.g., storage device 2524) include, but are not limited to, a hard disk drive, a magnetic disk drive, an optical disc drive in combination with an optical medium, a solid-state memory device, and any combinations thereof. Storage device 2524 may be connected to bus 2512 by an appropriate interface (not shown). Example interfaces include, but are not limited to, SCSI, advanced technology attachment (ATA), serial ATA, universal serial bus (USB), IEEE 1394 (FIREWIRE), and any combinations thereof. In one example, storage device 2524 (or one or more components thereof) may be removably interfaced with computer system 2500 (e.g., via an external port connector (not shown)). Particularly, storage device 2524 and an associated machine-readable medium 2528 may provide nonvolatile and/or volatile storage of machine-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, and/or other data for computer system 2500. In one example, software 2520 may reside, completely or partially, within machine-readable medium 2528. In another example, software 2520 may reside, completely or partially, within processor 2504.

Computer system 2500 may also include an input device 2532. In one example, a user of computer system 2500 may enter commands and/or other information into computer system 2500 via input device 2532. Examples of an input device 2532 include, but are not limited to, an alpha-numeric input device (e.g., a keyboard), a pointing device, a joystick, a gamepad, an audio input device (e.g., a microphone, a voice response system, etc.), a cursor control device (e.g., a mouse), a touchpad, an optical scanner, a video capture device (e.g., a still camera, a video camera), a touchscreen, and any combinations thereof. Input device 2532 may be interfaced to bus 2512 via any of a variety of interfaces (not shown) including, but not limited to, a serial interface, a parallel interface, a game port, a USB interface, a FIREWIRE interface, a direct interface to bus 2512, and any combinations thereof. Input device 2532 may include a touch screen interface that may be a part of or separate from display 2536, discussed further below. Input device 2532 may be utilized as a user selection device for selecting one or more graphical representations in a graphical interface as described above.

A user may also input commands and/or other information to computer system 2500 via storage device 2524 (e.g., a removable disk drive, a flash drive, etc.) and/or network interface device 2540. A network interface device, such as network interface device 2540, may be utilized for connecting computer system 2500 to one or more of a variety of networks, such as network 2544, and one or more remote devices 2548 connected thereto. Examples of a network interface device include, but are not limited to, a network interface card (e.g., a mobile network interface card, a LAN card), a modem, and any combination thereof. Examples of a network include, but are not limited to, a wide area network (e.g., the Internet, an enterprise network), a local area network (e.g., a network associated with an office, a building, a campus or other relatively small geographic space), a telephone network, a data network associated with a telephone/voice provider (e.g., a mobile communications provider data and/or voice network), a direct connection between two computing devices, and any combinations thereof. A network, such as network 2544, may employ a wired and/or a wireless mode of communication. In general, any network topology may be used. Information (e.g., data, software 2520, etc.) may be communicated to and/or from computer system 2500 via network interface device 2540.

Computer system 2500 may further include a video display adapter 2552 for communicating a displayable image to a display device, such as display device 2536. Examples of a display device include, but are not limited to, a liquid crystal display (LCD), a cathode ray tube (CRT), a plasma display, a light emitting diode (LED) display, and any combinations thereof. Display adapter 2552 and display device 2536 may be utilized in combination with processor 2504 to provide graphical representations of aspects of the present disclosure. In addition to a display device, computer system 2500 may include one or more other peripheral output devices including, but not limited to, an audio speaker, a printer, and any combinations thereof. Such peripheral output devices may be connected to bus 2512 via a peripheral interface 2556. Examples of a peripheral interface include, but are not limited to, a serial port, a USB connection, a FIREWIRE connection, a parallel connection, and any combinations thereof.

The foregoing has been a detailed description of illustrative embodiments of the invention. Various modifications and additions can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention. Features of each of the various embodiments described above may be combined with features of other described embodiments as appropriate in order to provide a multiplicity of feature combinations in associated new embodiments. Furthermore, while the foregoing describes a number of separate embodiments, what has been described herein is merely illustrative of the application of the principles of the present invention. Additionally, although particular methods herein may be illustrated and/or described as being performed in a specific order, the ordering is highly variable within ordinary skill to achieve methods, systems, and software according to the present disclosure. Accordingly, this description is meant to be taken only by way of example, and not to otherwise limit the scope of this invention.

Exemplary embodiments have been disclosed above and illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes, omissions and additions may be made to that which is specifically disclosed herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A system for an artificial intelligence support network for behavior modification, the system comprising at least a server, the at least a server designed and configured to receive at least a biological extraction from a user; train, iteratively, a machine learning model using a first training data set, wherein the first training data set comprises at least a prognostic label correlated to at least an element of physiological state datum; train, iteratively, a machine learning process using a second training data set, wherein the second training data set comprises longitudinal data for the user correlated to ameliorative process labels; generate a diagnostic output based on the at least a biological extraction using the machine learning model, wherein generating the diagnostic output comprises: generating at least an ameliorative process label; ranking the at least an ameliorative process label as a function of the machine learning process; determining at least a correct ameliorative process as a function of the ranking; and generating the diagnostic output, wherein the diagnostic output comprises the at least a correct ameliorative process; generate at least a request for a behavior modification as a function of the at least a correct ameliorative process label; and identify an influencer as a function of the at least a request for a behavior modification, wherein identifying the at least an influencer further comprises: determining a plurality of influencers based on the request for behavior modification; receiving, for each influencer of the plurality of influencers, a set of influencer attributes; and matching a set of user attributes to the set of influencer attributes corresponding to the influencer.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least a server is designed and configured to receive a first training data set including a plurality of first data entries, each first data entry of the plurality of first data entries including at least an element of physiological state data and at least a correlated first prognostic label.
 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least a server is designed and configured to receive a second training data set including a plurality of second data entries, each second data entry of the plurality of second data entries including at least a second prognostic label and at least a correlated ameliorative process label.
 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least a server generates the at least a request for a behavior modification as a function of a user requested category of behavior change.
 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least a server is configured to receive a user requested category of behavior change from a user client device.
 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least a server is configured to receive a user requested category of behavior change from an advisory client device.
 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least a server is configured to determine the plurality of influencers as a function of a user-requested category of at least an influencer.
 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least a server is further configured to match the set of user attributes to the set of influencer attributes by performing a classification algorithm matching the set of user attributes to the set of influencer attributes.
 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the classification algorithm classifies a set of problematic behavior attributes of the user to a set of positive qualities of the influencer.
 10. The system of claim 8, wherein the classification algorithm classifies a set of beliefs of a user to a set of beliefs of an influencer.
 11. A method of implementing an artificial intelligence support network for behavior modification, the method comprising receiving, by at least a server, at least a biological extraction from a user; training, iteratively, a machine learning model using a first training data set, wherein the first training data set comprises at least a prognostic label correlated to at least an element of physiological state datum; training, iteratively, a machine learning process using a second training data set, wherein the second training data set comprises longitudinal data for the user correlated to ameliorative process labels; generating, by the at least a server, a diagnostic output based on the at least a biological extraction using the machine learning model, wherein generating the diagnostic output comprises: generating at least an ameliorative process label; ranking the at least an ameliorative process label as a function of the machine learning model; determining at least a correct ameliorative process as a function of the ranking; and generating the diagnostic output, wherein the diagnostic output comprises the at least a correct ameliorative process; generating, by the at least a server, at least a request for a behavior modification as a function of the at least a correct ameliorative process label; and identifying, by the at least a server, an influencer as a function of the at least a request for a behavior modification, wherein identifying the at least an influencer further comprises: determining a plurality of influencers based on the request for behavior modification; receiving, for each influencer of the plurality of influencers, a set of influencer attributes; and matching a set of user attributes to the set of influencer attributes corresponding to the influencer.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein generating the diagnostic output further comprises receiving a first training data set including a plurality of first data entries, each first data entry of the plurality of first data entries including at least an element of physiological state data and at least a correlated first prognostic label.
 13. The method of claim 11, wherein generating the diagnostic output further comprises receiving a second training data set including a plurality of second data entries, each second data entry of the plurality of second data entries including at least a second prognostic label and at least a correlated ameliorative process label.
 14. The method of claim 11, wherein generating the at least a request for behavior modification further comprises generating the at least a request for a behavior modification as a function of a user requested category of behavior change.
 15. The method of claim 11, wherein generating the at least a request for behavior modification further comprises receiving a user requested category of behavior change from a user client device.
 16. The method of claim 11, wherein generating the at least a request for behavior modification further comprises receiving a user requested category of behavior change from an advisory client device.
 17. The method of claim 11, wherein determining the plurality of influencers further comprises determining the plurality of influencers as a function of a user-requested category of at least an influencer.
 18. The method of claim 11, wherein matching the set of user attributes to the set of influencer attributes by performing a classification algorithm matching the set of user attributes to the set of influencer attributes.
 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the classification algorithm classifies a set of problematic behavior attributes of the user to a set of positive qualities of the influencer.
 20. The method of claim 18, wherein the classification algorithm classifies a set of beliefs of a user to a set of beliefs of an influencer. 